III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

Table of tables
TABLE 1. TUNER SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS...........................................................................................................- 22 -
TABLE 2. SELECTIVITY SPECIFICATIONS.........................................................................................................................- 28 -
TABLE 3. RF PERFORMANCES SPECIFICATIONS..............................................................................................................- 29 -
TABLE 4. COMPARISON OF THE TOPOLOGIES ................................................................................................................- 48 -
TABLE 5. GM-C & GYRATOR-C RF FILTERS..................................................................................................................- 72 -
TABLE 6. CMOS TECHNOLOGIES COMPARISON.............................................................................................................- 78 -
TABLE 7. SPECIFICATIONS OF THE TRANSCONDUCTOR DESIGN..........................................................................................- 95 -
TABLE 8. COMPARISON OF THE TRANSCONDUCTANCE LINEARIZATION TECHNIQUES ............................................................- 103 -
TABLE 9. DESCRIPTION OF THE CAPACITOR BANK .........................................................................................................- 105 -
TABLE 10. GM-CELL DIMENSIONING .........................................................................................................................- 107 -
TABLE 11. TRANSCONDUCTANCE CHOICE...................................................................................................................- 107 -
TABLE 12. GM-CELL DIMENSIONING .........................................................................................................................- 109 -
TABLE 13. PROCESS AND MISMATCH VARIATIONS.......................................................................................................- 113 -
TABLE 14. LINEARITY PROCESS AND MISMATCH VARIATIONS ........................................................................................- 114 -
TABLE 15. PERFORMANCES COMPARISON .................................................................................................................- 115 -
TABLE 16. FILTER 2 FREQUENCY LIMITATIONS.............................................................................................................- 116 -
TABLE 17. SUM-UP OF THE VARIOUS FILTERS PARAMETERS............................................................................................- 124 -
TABLE 18. SENSITIVITY TO PASSIVE COMPONENTS OF THE SALLEN-KEY FILTER ...................................................................- 126 -
TABLE 19. SENSITIVITY TO PASSIVE COMPONENTS OF THE RAUCH FILTER..........................................................................- 126 -
TABLE 20. COMPARISON SALLEN-KEY VERSUS RAUCH FILTERS .......................................................................................- 127 -
TABLE 21. PASSIVE COMPONENTS VALUES ................................................................................................................- 129 -
TABLE 22. DESCRIPTION OF THE CAPACITOR BANK .......................................................................................................- 130 -
TABLE 23. NOISE FIGURE OF THE FILTER ACCORDING TO THE NATURE OF Z0 AND Z F ...........................................................- 133 -
TABLE 24. STABILITY MARGINS SPECIFICATIONS...........................................................................................................- 134 -
TABLE 25. SUM-UP OF THE OA SPECIFICATIONS..........................................................................................................- 135 -
TABLE 26. 65NM CMOS RAUCH FILTER PERFORMANCES.............................................................................................- 137 -
TABLE 27. STABILITY MARGINS ENHANCEMENT BY MEANS OF C STAB2 (NOMINAL PROCESS, -20°C, 3V SUPPLY) .........................- 143 -
TABLE 28. MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS (65°C, 3.3V SUPPLY, PROCESS AND MISMATCH) .................................................- 150 -
TABLE 29. SUM-UP OF THE RAUCH FILTER PERFORMANCES ...........................................................................................- 155 -
TABLE 30. FREQUENCY LIMITATIONS OF THE RAUCH FILTER ..........................................................................................- 157 -
TABLE 31. SUM-UP OF 4-PATH FILTER PERFORMANCES.................................................................................................- 167 -
TABLE 32. SUM-UP OF RF FRONT-END PERFORMANCES WITH A HIGH-Q 4-PATH RF FILTER.................................................- 168 -
TABLE 33. PERFORMANCES COMPARISON .................................................................................................................- 174 -
TABLE 34. SUM-UP OF THE RAUCH FILTER PERFORMANCES ...........................................................................................- 175 -
TABLE 35. PERFORMANCES COMPARISON .................................................................................................................- 176 -
- 228 -