10.08.2013 Views

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

V.2.b Selectivity and Main Parameters<br />

For first simulations, switches size is 100/0.06 and capacitors are 66pF, as <strong>de</strong>scribed in<br />

[V.5]. Clock frequency fclk is 250MHz and the differential output signal, which exhibits a<br />

quality factor of 5, is plotted versus frequency in Figure 187.<br />

fclk<br />

3fclk<br />

5fclk<br />

Figure 187. Output signal versus frequency with fclk=250MHz<br />

As expected, the closest folding appears at 3×250=750MHz and higher frequency<br />

foldings are located at odd multiples of the clock frequency.<br />

Maximum rejection is 19dB for a -3dB gain at the central frequency. In the literature,<br />

it is <strong>de</strong>monstrated that maximum rejection is limited by the Ron switch resistance which has to<br />

be very small with respect to source resistance R. Larger switch size than 100/0.06 can then<br />

be used to enhance maximum rejection as it may be observed in Figure 188. However, this<br />

means larger parasitic capacitors, which affect the tuning range and clock leakage, and also<br />

require more clock power to drive the switches [V.5].<br />

Figure 188. Enhancement of the maximum rejection reducing the Ron of the switches<br />

- 164 -<br />

7fclk<br />

9fclk 11fclk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!