III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges
III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges
III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IV.5 Frequency Limitations<br />
As said, the Rauch filter has originally been <strong>de</strong>signed to be tunable between 45 and<br />
240MHz. The use of this filter at higher operating frequencies results in using the OA with a<br />
reduced voltage gain. In<strong>de</strong>ed, due to its finite GBW, the gain of the OA <strong>de</strong>creases with<br />
frequency [IV.7].<br />
since<br />
Furthermore, a lower OA gain leads to a higher K and so to a Q-factor enhancement<br />
( Z 0 + Z f )<br />
− ( Z + Z )<br />
A(<br />
jω)<br />
K(<br />
jω<br />
) =<br />
. (V.31)<br />
A(<br />
jω)<br />
Z<br />
0<br />
In<strong>de</strong>ed, the fixed capacitor <strong>de</strong>crease to 6pF in the capacitors banks so that the central<br />
frequency increases as well leads to a Q factor of 6 at 450MHz, and to a gain of 15dB. Q is<br />
enhanced due to a lower OA gain. Moreover, due to this smaller voltage gain, the input RF<br />
signal is more subject to distortions from the OA. This is why IIP3 strongly <strong>de</strong>creases as<br />
frequency increases. At 450MHz, in this configuration, IIP3 falls down to -3dBm.<br />
One possibility to counter the change in the value of K is to implement a tunable<br />
capacitor Cf (or C0) in or<strong>de</strong>r to keep K constant. This partially fights the drop of the OA gain<br />
and gives the results <strong>de</strong>scribed in Table 30 where 5dBm IIP3 (for 10dB gain) are obtained at<br />
450MHz for a 3.5 Q factor value.<br />
Last point preventing us from using the Rauch structure at higher frequencies is the<br />
tra<strong>de</strong>-off selectivity versus filter gain. As explained in introduction, a more <strong>de</strong>manding<br />
selectivity is required in UHF in or<strong>de</strong>r to reject adjacent channels in a sufficient way. This is<br />
only possible increasing the gain of the filter. However, this solution would require<br />
amplifying less on the front-end LNA and it would result in challenging noise constraints on<br />
this LNA as well [IV.3].<br />
0<br />
- 156 -<br />
f