10.08.2013 Views

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 159. Final operational amplifier schematic<br />

Figure 160 illustrates the gain and the phase of the OA without Cstab2 and then with<br />

Cstab2=5pF. This capacitor introduces a zero in the transfer function of the OA. This allows<br />

increasing the phase when OA gain is close to 0dB, thus increasing the phase margin to -180°<br />

[IV.7]. Cstab2 value is tuned so as to obtain sufficient gain and phase margins.<br />

Table 27 has been built using schematic simulations and <strong>de</strong>scribes the enhancement of<br />

the stability margins, especially for PVT worst cases (-20°C and 3V supply as it may be seen<br />

later on), reaches +18° of phase margin and +6dB of gain margin. This is very important to<br />

ensure the reliability of the circuit in an industrial environment.<br />

GM and PM are 3dB and 8° above the specification to ensure the robustness<br />

specifications when taking into account process and mismatch dispersion as well as the<br />

parasitics.<br />

However, the major drawback of this solution is the <strong>de</strong>gradation of the common-mo<strong>de</strong><br />

rejection. In<strong>de</strong>ed, at high frequency of operation, the circuit progressively becomes pseudodifferential.<br />

Measures of the common-mo<strong>de</strong> rejection have been carried out. The filter rejects<br />

the common-mo<strong>de</strong> by 13dB at 68MHz and by 11dB at 180MHz. These values correlate with<br />

simulations.<br />

- 142 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!