10.08.2013 Views

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Furthermore, the high sensitivity to process and mismatch issues of the MGTR<br />

technique is illustrated in Figure 132. This figure <strong>de</strong>picts the Monte-Carlo simulation results<br />

of the <strong>Gm</strong>-cell IIP3. It appears that the mean value is 19.8dBm, which is the targeted value.<br />

However, the standard <strong>de</strong>viation <strong>de</strong>scribes a high dispersion for 100 runs, since σ=1.5dBm.<br />

The dispersion and the sensitivity to PDA bias of each <strong>Gm</strong>-cell will result in a very sensitive<br />

filter. Robustness already appears as a limiting issue.<br />

Figure 132. Monte-Carlo Simulations of the <strong>Gm</strong>-cell IIP3 for 100 runs<br />

<strong>III</strong>.3.c.ii Filter Performances<br />

The tuning range of Filter1 covers the full 45 to 450MHz band. A constant Q-factor of<br />

4 is <strong>de</strong>picted in Figure 133 and guarantees a minimal harmonic rejection. Figure 134<br />

represents the evolution of the central frequency versus the capacitance provi<strong>de</strong>d by the<br />

capacitor banks.<br />

Figure 133. Filter Gain and Q-factor for various central frequencies<br />

- 111 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!