10.08.2013 Views

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

However, Figure 119 shows that this high linearity level is reached on a linearity peak<br />

for the PDA bias. As soon as the PDA bias drifts from its original value, the IIP3 of the <strong>Gm</strong>cell<br />

is drastically reduced.<br />

Figure 119. Transconductance linearization by MGTR<br />

<strong>III</strong>.2.g Transconductance Linearization Techniques Comparison<br />

Table 8 summarizes the linearity performances obtained using the different<br />

linearization techniques, as well as the advantages and drawbacks of each. To make<br />

quantitative comparisons, performances are simulated at 100MHz. The <strong>Gm</strong>-cells are studied<br />

with a capacitive load CL (see Figure 120) which <strong>de</strong>pends on the gm value to keep the same<br />

g m<br />

ratio.<br />

C<br />

Figure 120. <strong>Gm</strong>-cell test bench<br />

The <strong>Gm</strong>-cell DC voltage gain is set close to 22.5dB as explained further. Hence, all<br />

gm, r0 and C parameters are equal or comparable. Furthermore, at 100MHz, it should be<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rlined that the <strong>Gm</strong>-cell voltage gain is close to 0dB.<br />

- 102 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!