Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
No. <strong>Commenter</strong> Position 1<br />
Comment<br />
on Behalf<br />
<strong>of</strong> Group?<br />
Rule 1.5 Fees for Legal Services.<br />
[<strong>Sorted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Commenter</strong>]<br />
Rule<br />
Paragraph<br />
RRC - 4-200 1-5 - Public Comment Chart - By <strong>Commenter</strong> - DFT3.1 (10-21-09)RD-KEM-AT-RD.doc<br />
Comment RRC Response<br />
refundable fee or non-refundable retainer and<br />
a true retainer.<br />
Comment [6] should include a clarification that<br />
the rule does not apply to the attorney<br />
withdrawing from representation for nonpayment<br />
<strong>of</strong> attorney fees <strong>by</strong> the client,<br />
assuming the attorney complies with the rules<br />
for termination <strong>of</strong> the attorney-client<br />
relationship.<br />
38 Sevilla, Charles D Current rules on excessive fees are sufficient.<br />
Non-refundable fees are beneficial to a<br />
criminal defendant <strong>by</strong> providing certainty to<br />
the client while insuring access to attorney<br />
services.<br />
flat fee is the lawyer’s property on receipt.<br />
The written fee agreement shall, in a<br />
manner that can easily be understood <strong>by</strong><br />
the client, include the following: (i) the scope<br />
<strong>of</strong> the services to be provided; (ii) the total<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> the fee and the terms <strong>of</strong><br />
payment; (iii) that the fee is the lawyer’s<br />
property immediately on receipt; (iv) that the<br />
fee agreement does not alter the client’s<br />
right to terminate the client-lawyer<br />
relationship; and (v) that the client may be<br />
entitled to a refund <strong>of</strong> a portion <strong>of</strong> the fee if<br />
the agreed-upon legal services have not<br />
been completed.<br />
In addition, Comment [13] contains discussion<br />
regarding what constitutes a “true” retainer and<br />
Comment [14] contains discussion regarding what<br />
constitutes a “flat fee.”<br />
To address the commenter’s concerns but still provide<br />
for enhanced client protection, the Commission<br />
revised the approach to advance fee payments in<br />
paragraph (e) <strong>of</strong> the Rule to provide as follows:<br />
(2) a lawyer may charge a flat fee for specified<br />
legal services, which constitutes complete<br />
payment for those services and may be paid<br />
in whole or in part in advance <strong>of</strong> the lawyer<br />
providing the services. If agreed to in<br />
advance in a writing signed <strong>by</strong> the client, a flat<br />
fee is the lawyer’s property on receipt. The<br />
280