10.08.2013 Views

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

No. <strong>Commenter</strong> Position 1<br />

Comment<br />

on Behalf<br />

<strong>of</strong> Group?<br />

Rule 1.5 Fees for Legal Services.<br />

[<strong>Sorted</strong> <strong>by</strong> <strong>Commenter</strong>]<br />

Rule<br />

Paragraph<br />

RRC - 4-200 1-5 - Public Comment Chart - By <strong>Commenter</strong> - DFT3.1 (10-21-09)RD-KEM-AT-RD.doc<br />

Comment RRC Response<br />

refundable fee or non-refundable retainer and<br />

a true retainer.<br />

Comment [6] should include a clarification that<br />

the rule does not apply to the attorney<br />

withdrawing from representation for nonpayment<br />

<strong>of</strong> attorney fees <strong>by</strong> the client,<br />

assuming the attorney complies with the rules<br />

for termination <strong>of</strong> the attorney-client<br />

relationship.<br />

38 Sevilla, Charles D Current rules on excessive fees are sufficient.<br />

Non-refundable fees are beneficial to a<br />

criminal defendant <strong>by</strong> providing certainty to<br />

the client while insuring access to attorney<br />

services.<br />

flat fee is the lawyer’s property on receipt.<br />

The written fee agreement shall, in a<br />

manner that can easily be understood <strong>by</strong><br />

the client, include the following: (i) the scope<br />

<strong>of</strong> the services to be provided; (ii) the total<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> the fee and the terms <strong>of</strong><br />

payment; (iii) that the fee is the lawyer’s<br />

property immediately on receipt; (iv) that the<br />

fee agreement does not alter the client’s<br />

right to terminate the client-lawyer<br />

relationship; and (v) that the client may be<br />

entitled to a refund <strong>of</strong> a portion <strong>of</strong> the fee if<br />

the agreed-upon legal services have not<br />

been completed.<br />

In addition, Comment [13] contains discussion<br />

regarding what constitutes a “true” retainer and<br />

Comment [14] contains discussion regarding what<br />

constitutes a “flat fee.”<br />

To address the commenter’s concerns but still provide<br />

for enhanced client protection, the Commission<br />

revised the approach to advance fee payments in<br />

paragraph (e) <strong>of</strong> the Rule to provide as follows:<br />

(2) a lawyer may charge a flat fee for specified<br />

legal services, which constitutes complete<br />

payment for those services and may be paid<br />

in whole or in part in advance <strong>of</strong> the lawyer<br />

providing the services. If agreed to in<br />

advance in a writing signed <strong>by</strong> the client, a flat<br />

fee is the lawyer’s property on receipt. The<br />

280

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!