Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

No. Commenter Position 1
Comment
on Behalf
of Group?
Rule 1.5 Fees for Legal Services.
[Sorted by Commenter]
Rule
Paragraph
RRC - 4-200 1-5 - Public Comment Chart - By Commenter - DFT3.1 (10-21-09)RD-KEM-AT-RD.doc
Comment RRC Response
depend on the facts. A lawyer with a strong
reputation, just by agreeing to represent a
client may cause a lawsuit to vanish and
thereby obtain a substantial benefit for the
client and should be entitled to keep the
amount paid to him.
Dishonest lawyers will attempt to overcharge
a client regardless of the type of retainer.
Use of “unreasonable fee” in Model Rules
1.5(a&b) could replace “unconscionable”.
30 Orange County Bar
Association (Trudy
Levindofske)
D None
31 Phillips, John G. D Proposal has been inadequately publicized.
flat fee is the lawyer’s property on receipt.
The written fee agreement shall, in a
manner that can easily be understood by
the client, include the following: (i) the scope
of the services to be provided; (ii) the total
amount of the fee and the terms of
payment; (iii) that the fee is the lawyer’s
property immediately on receipt; (iv) that the
fee agreement does not alter the client’s
right to terminate the client-lawyer
relationship; and (v) that the client may be
entitled to a refund of a portion of the fee if
the agreed-upon legal services have not
been completed.
The proposal was issued for a 90-day public
comment period posted on the State Bar website
and was also the subject of a public hearing in
Sacramento that was noticed by several methods,
including: a posting at the State Bar website;
public notices in the Daily Journal, the Daily
Recorder, and the Sacramento Bee; e-mail
notifications to approximately 14,000 interested
persons; and a press release to the media.
274