Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
ABA Model Rule<br />
Rule 1.5 Fees<br />
(1) the time and labor required, the novelty and<br />
difficulty <strong>of</strong> the questions involved, and the<br />
skill requisite to perform the legal service<br />
properly;<br />
(2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that<br />
the acceptance <strong>of</strong> the particular employment<br />
will preclude other employment <strong>by</strong> the<br />
lawyer;<br />
Commission’s Proposed Rule *<br />
Rule 1.5 Fees for Legal Services<br />
(c) Among the factors to be considered, where<br />
appropriate, in determining the conscionability <strong>of</strong><br />
a fee or in-house expense are the following:<br />
(1) the amount <strong>of</strong> the fee or in-house expense<br />
in proportion to the value <strong>of</strong> the services<br />
performed;<br />
(2) the relative sophistication <strong>of</strong> the lawyer and<br />
the client;<br />
(13) the time and labor required, the novelty and<br />
difficulty <strong>of</strong> the questions involved, and the<br />
skill requisite to perform the legal service<br />
properly;<br />
(24) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that<br />
the acceptance <strong>of</strong> the particular employment<br />
will preclude other employment <strong>by</strong> the<br />
lawyer;<br />
Explanation <strong>of</strong> Changes to the ABA Model Rule<br />
Paragraph (c) is based on the second sentence and<br />
subparagraphs <strong>of</strong> Model Rule 1.5(a), revised <strong>by</strong> substituting the<br />
recommended “unconscionable” standard.<br />
Subparagraph (1) has no counterpart in the Model Rule. Carried<br />
forward from current rule 4-200(B)(1), subparagraph (1)<br />
recognizes that a lawyer should assess the costs and benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
the lawyer’s services in determining what tasks to perform.<br />
Subparagraph (2) has no counterpart in the Model Rule. Carried<br />
forward from current rule 4-200(B)(2), subparagraph (1)<br />
recognizes that the experience <strong>of</strong> a client in using legal services<br />
can be relevant in determining the conscionability <strong>of</strong> a fee.<br />
Subparagraph (3) is identical to Model Rule 1.5(a)(1), except that<br />
the phrase “the time and labor required” has been given status as<br />
a separate factor for consideration. See subparagraph (10).<br />
Subparagraph (4) is identical to Model Rule 1.5(a)(2).<br />
RRC - 4-200 1-5 - Compare - Rule Comment Explanation - DFT5 1 (02-08-10)KEM-ML-RD-KEM.doc {Note: Green/Italic text in the middle column indicates Model Rule text that has been moved rather than stricken.}<br />
213