10.08.2013 Views

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ABA Model Rule<br />

Rule 1.5 Fees<br />

(1) the time and labor required, the novelty and<br />

difficulty <strong>of</strong> the questions involved, and the<br />

skill requisite to perform the legal service<br />

properly;<br />

(2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that<br />

the acceptance <strong>of</strong> the particular employment<br />

will preclude other employment <strong>by</strong> the<br />

lawyer;<br />

Commission’s Proposed Rule *<br />

Rule 1.5 Fees for Legal Services<br />

(c) Among the factors to be considered, where<br />

appropriate, in determining the conscionability <strong>of</strong><br />

a fee or in-house expense are the following:<br />

(1) the amount <strong>of</strong> the fee or in-house expense<br />

in proportion to the value <strong>of</strong> the services<br />

performed;<br />

(2) the relative sophistication <strong>of</strong> the lawyer and<br />

the client;<br />

(13) the time and labor required, the novelty and<br />

difficulty <strong>of</strong> the questions involved, and the<br />

skill requisite to perform the legal service<br />

properly;<br />

(24) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that<br />

the acceptance <strong>of</strong> the particular employment<br />

will preclude other employment <strong>by</strong> the<br />

lawyer;<br />

Explanation <strong>of</strong> Changes to the ABA Model Rule<br />

Paragraph (c) is based on the second sentence and<br />

subparagraphs <strong>of</strong> Model Rule 1.5(a), revised <strong>by</strong> substituting the<br />

recommended “unconscionable” standard.<br />

Subparagraph (1) has no counterpart in the Model Rule. Carried<br />

forward from current rule 4-200(B)(1), subparagraph (1)<br />

recognizes that a lawyer should assess the costs and benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

the lawyer’s services in determining what tasks to perform.<br />

Subparagraph (2) has no counterpart in the Model Rule. Carried<br />

forward from current rule 4-200(B)(2), subparagraph (1)<br />

recognizes that the experience <strong>of</strong> a client in using legal services<br />

can be relevant in determining the conscionability <strong>of</strong> a fee.<br />

Subparagraph (3) is identical to Model Rule 1.5(a)(1), except that<br />

the phrase “the time and labor required” has been given status as<br />

a separate factor for consideration. See subparagraph (10).<br />

Subparagraph (4) is identical to Model Rule 1.5(a)(2).<br />

RRC - 4-200 1-5 - Compare - Rule Comment Explanation - DFT5 1 (02-08-10)KEM-ML-RD-KEM.doc {Note: Green/Italic text in the middle column indicates Model Rule text that has been moved rather than stricken.}<br />

213

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!