- Page 1 and 2:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 3 and 4:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 5 and 6:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 7 and 8:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 9 and 10:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 11 and 12:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 13 and 14:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 15 and 16:
No. Commenter Position 1 10 Crimina
- Page 17 and 18:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 19 and 20:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 21 and 22:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 23 and 24:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 25 and 26:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 27 and 28:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 29 and 30:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 31 and 32:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 33 and 34:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 35 and 36:
ARBITRATION ADVISORY 01-02 RRC - Ru
- Page 37 and 38:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 39 and 40:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 41 and 42:
http://community.lawyers.com/forums
- Page 43 and 44:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 45 and 46:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 47 and 48:
May 25, 2010 Martinez E-mail to Son
- Page 49 and 50:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 51 and 52:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 53:
Rule 1.5 - Public Comment - File Li
- Page 67 and 68:
101
- Page 69 and 70:
103
- Page 71 and 72:
105
- Page 73 and 74:
107
- Page 75 and 76:
109
- Page 77 and 78:
111
- Page 79 and 80:
113
- Page 81 and 82:
115
- Page 83 and 84:
117
- Page 85 and 86:
STROOCK April 2, 2010 Michael F. Pe
- Page 87 and 88:
MORTIMER L. LASKI' KENNETH G. GORDO
- Page 89 and 90:
Mr. Howard Miller April 8 , 2010 Pa
- Page 91 and 92:
125
- Page 93 and 94:
127
- Page 95 and 96:
129
- Page 97 and 98:
131
- Page 99 and 100:
unaware 2 of this new rule or that
- Page 101 and 102:
BARRY TARLow. BLAIR BERK MARK O. HE
- Page 103 and 104: 4, The Proposal a. Comment b. 5. Th
- Page 105 and 106: arrangement, has always been subjec
- Page 107 and 108: (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) Par
- Page 109 and 110: edefines a widely accepted , and in
- Page 111 and 112: alone seek to prohibit , no version
- Page 113 and 114: meeting reflects that there was no
- Page 115 and 116: II. ANAL YSIS OF THE SUBSTANTIVE PR
- Page 117 and 118: Responsibility and Conduct 10 They
- Page 119 and 120: . . " " I suggest we . . . have a c
- Page 121 and 122: agreed hourly or by an whether the
- Page 123 and 124: " " On , Paragraph flat fees" as th
- Page 125 and 126: arrangement with the inclusion of a
- Page 127 and 128: agreement, that result in the refun
- Page 129 and 130: the Commission s proposed paragraph
- Page 131 and 132: true if the fee anything but an abs
- Page 133 and 134: Restraining orders, fee forfeitures
- Page 135 and 136: fee is "the lawyer s property on re
- Page 137 and 138: Under the revised Proposal, the fee
- Page 139 and 140: Similarly, the accepts one case tha
- Page 141 and 142: minimum fee that is a payments or a
- Page 143 and 144: Champion (May 2004); Tarlow Fee For
- Page 145 and 146: July 10, 2007 Memo from the Board o
- Page 147 and 148: the work has been completed and aft
- Page 149 and 150: '-- 183
- Page 151 and 152: BIOGRAPHY Page scholar " the "ultim
- Page 153: 187
- Page 158 and 159: 192
- Page 160 and 161: 194
- Page 162 and 163: 196
- Page 164 and 165: 198
- Page 166 and 167: 200
- Page 168 and 169: President Cynthia Hujar Orr San Ant
- Page 170 and 171: to safeguard clients from excessive
- Page 172 and 173: Rule Revision Commission Action/Vot
- Page 174 and 175: The Commission recommends that Cali
- Page 176 and 177: epresentative organizations disagre
- Page 178 and 179: ABA Model Rule Rule 1.5 Fees (a) A
- Page 180 and 181: ABA Model Rule Rule 1.5 Fees (3) th
- Page 182 and 183: ABA Model Rule Rule 1.5 Fees to the
- Page 184 and 185: ABA Model Rule Rule 1.5 Fees Commis
- Page 186 and 187: ABA Model Rule Rule 1.5 Fees Commen
- Page 188 and 189: ABA Model Rule Rule 1.5 Fees Commen
- Page 190 and 191: ABA Model Rule Rule 1.5 Fees Commen
- Page 192 and 193: ABA Model Rule Rule 1.5 Fees Commen
- Page 194 and 195: Division of Fee ABA Model Rule Rule
- Page 196 and 197: ABA Model Rule Rule 1.5 Fees Commen
- Page 198 and 199: (fe) A lawyer shall not make an agr
- Page 200 and 201: ethics opinions to ascertain their
- Page 202 and 203: (A)(a) A memberlawyer shall not ent
- Page 204 and 205:
In-house expenses are charges by th
- Page 206 and 207:
RRC - 4-200 [1-5] - CLEAN Landscape
- Page 208 and 209:
Basis or Rate of Fee [2] In many ci
- Page 210 and 211:
Availability Fees, Advance Fees, an
- Page 212 and 213:
Rule 1.5: Fees for Legal Services S
- Page 214 and 215:
(g) A division of fees [between law
- Page 216 and 217:
(d) representation where the attorn
- Page 218 and 219:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 220 and 221:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 222 and 223:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 224 and 225:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 226 and 227:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 228 and 229:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 230 and 231:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 232 and 233:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 234 and 235:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 236 and 237:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 238 and 239:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 240 and 241:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 242 and 243:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 244 and 245:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 246 and 247:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 248 and 249:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 250 and 251:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 252 and 253:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 254 and 255:
No. Commenter Position 1 Comment on
- Page 256 and 257:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 258 and 259:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 260 and 261:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 262 and 263:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 264 and 265:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 266 and 267:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 268 and 269:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 270 and 271:
May 21, 2010 KEM E-mail to Sondheim
- Page 272 and 273:
May 23, 2010 Sondheim E-mail to KEM
- Page 274 and 275:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 276 and 277:
May 25, 2010 Difuntorum E-mail to D
- Page 278 and 279:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 280 and 281:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 282 and 283:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 284 and 285:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 286 and 287:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 288 and 289:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 290 and 291:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc
- Page 292 and 293:
RRC - Rule 1.5 [4-200] E-mails, etc