10.08.2013 Views

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

owns the s property on<br />

erroneously asserted to be in paragraph (e)(2).<br />

Moreover, <strong>by</strong><br />

changing the existing requirements as to what can or must be deposited in a client trust<br />

account and what cannot (see discussion at pp. 17- supra; see also Comments (8), (9),<br />

(11)), the Proposal creates a trap for even experienced members <strong>of</strong> the Bar acting in good<br />

faith but unfamiliar<br />

inferentially required <strong>by</strong> section (e<br />

The Proposal and The Economic Viability <strong>of</strong> Firms: "Get it in Front<br />

or You Will Get it in the End"<br />

Lawyers using<br />

are expended on a case. Experience has<br />

more , the criminal defense bar and<br />

themselves in a troubling<br />

fixed fee that is earned when received and substantially underestimates the work, he will<br />

certainly not be terminated <strong>by</strong> the client. However, if the lawyer through skill and ability<br />

has prevailed in an important part <strong>of</strong> the case that is not outcome-determinative, the client<br />

can then terminate the representation without cause and obtain a refund<br />

portion <strong>of</strong> the fixed fee that under the lawyer<br />

property" or property to which the lawyer is entitled.<br />

The Proposal fails to: (1)<br />

obtain a superior result despite spending only a small amount <strong>of</strong> time on the matter than a<br />

less capable, less accomplished attorney would achieve after spending numerous hours <strong>of</strong><br />

unnecessary litigation, (2) help firms<br />

before the client changes to<br />

representing other potential clients involved in the case, and (3) young criminal defense<br />

lawyers learn early on that a nonrefundable<br />

economic viability <strong>of</strong> an active criminal practice. Failure to arrange<br />

that is truly earned when received is an<br />

been characterized as "Get it in front or you will get it in the end. See Tarlow Five<br />

Important Words on Fee Forfeiture: Getting It in the End The<br />

If the client demands the refund under the proposed provisions at a time after the<br />

lawyer has paid taxes on the money, what does the lawyer put in the trust account?<br />

fee paid <strong>by</strong> the client or the fee less the taxes? What<br />

and does not have excess funds to deposit?<br />

176

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!