Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
minimum fee that is a<br />
payments or an hourly<br />
through the different steps (i.e. , including in a criminal case, pre-filing, administrative<br />
hearings , discovery, pre-trial , trial, post-trial, and<br />
nonrefundable retainers are <strong>of</strong>ten used as a partial payment in combination with fixed fee<br />
payments or <strong>of</strong>ten hourly credits against the retainer.<br />
This kind <strong>of</strong> unworkable language together with the unnecessary "Rube Goldberg<br />
creation <strong>of</strong> section ( , bar<br />
complaints and civil disputes , for a<br />
ongoing or in need <strong>of</strong> any reform under the<br />
non-specialist practitioners drafting a fee agreement in their first "big" case.<br />
b. Paragraph (e)(2)<br />
Paragraph (e , on the pain <strong>of</strong> discipline, to include the<br />
enumerated language (e)(2)(i)-(v) in their fee<br />
may be entitled to a refund <strong>of</strong> a portion <strong>of</strong> the fee, if the agreed upon legal service has<br />
not been completed. " The section, however, provides no guidance in situations (two <strong>of</strong><br />
which are outlined below) that practicing attorneys are routinely confronted with:<br />
(a) Where a lawyer may get a good result but not a complete result:<br />
when the client fires the lawyer after the lawyer gets a good result but not a<br />
complete result that is , in a criminal<br />
case, a lawyer succeeds in winning a motion to suppress but the retainer is for<br />
the entire trial.<br />
substantially. Is the client entitled to a refund <strong>of</strong> a substantial portion <strong>of</strong> the fee<br />
after firing the lawyer without cause? , how much?<br />
(b) Where the case is concluded but the agreed upon legal services have not been<br />
performed: For example, the fee<br />
case, including a potential six week jury trial, and the lawyer wins the case in<br />
two months after a preliminary , <strong>by</strong> filing a demurrer.<br />
The case is then completed but the lawyer has not performed the agreed upon<br />
legal services. Is the client , how is this<br />
computed?<br />
Paragraph (e )(2) also<br />
actual nature <strong>of</strong> the fee <strong>by</strong> asserting that the fee "is the lawyer s property on receipt." See<br />
discussion at pp. 19- 20; 29- supra. The problem is not what the fee is called but who<br />
175