Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Conflicts<br />
The Proposal fails to account for the conflict situation in many civil and criminal<br />
litigation matters where accepting a particular client in a case precludes the lawyer from<br />
representing a number<br />
retainer is designed and intended to solve specific problems in a multi-defendant case. It<br />
is not unusual in these cases for there to be anywhere from six to twelve people charged<br />
in a complex fraud or controlled substance case. Often, if not most <strong>of</strong> the time, there are<br />
conflicts between and among the<br />
person eliminates the lawyer from consideration in representing any other<br />
potential co-conspirator who may later be charged, or any<br />
Lawyers are quite <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
publicized<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> representing any number <strong>of</strong> other people who may request to be represented<br />
<strong>by</strong> the law<br />
investigated or indicted in the future in a related matter.<br />
In addition, in the field <strong>of</strong> , the lawyer or law firm<br />
accepting a client not only <strong>of</strong>ten forecloses representation <strong>of</strong> any other parties involved in<br />
the pending transactions, but may also be precluded in the future from representing other<br />
major clients in transactions that come to fruition years later.<br />
account for the special knowledge, experience and ability an attorney may have already<br />
acquired on an issue or area <strong>of</strong> the law, which might otherwise have to be gathered at the<br />
expense <strong>of</strong> a client with a less<br />
legitimate bases for<br />
justifying nonrefundable retainers.<br />
Setting out in a fee the fee agreement does not alter the client'<br />
right to terminate the (see Rule 1.5(e)(iv)) and also that the<br />
client " may be entitled to a refund" (see Rule<br />
lawyer, have the lawyer work on the case for<br />
lawyer without cause, demand a refund, and then prevent the lawyer from<br />
anyone else in the litigation or<br />
permitted to terminate the lawyer for cause, the lawyer and the client should also be free<br />
to ensure that a satisfactory fee arrangement has been negotiated to cover the contingency<br />
<strong>of</strong> a discharge without good cause. This problem is further<br />
the true retainer the lawyer must be<br />
compensated for "any services provided. See Comment (8). The small fee<br />
availability will most <strong>of</strong>ten never compensate the lawyer or law firm for being unable to<br />
represent anyone else related to the case.<br />
172