10.08.2013 Views

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

Sorted by Commenter - Ethics - State of California

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conflicts<br />

The Proposal fails to account for the conflict situation in many civil and criminal<br />

litigation matters where accepting a particular client in a case precludes the lawyer from<br />

representing a number<br />

retainer is designed and intended to solve specific problems in a multi-defendant case. It<br />

is not unusual in these cases for there to be anywhere from six to twelve people charged<br />

in a complex fraud or controlled substance case. Often, if not most <strong>of</strong> the time, there are<br />

conflicts between and among the<br />

person eliminates the lawyer from consideration in representing any other<br />

potential co-conspirator who may later be charged, or any<br />

Lawyers are quite <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

publicized<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> representing any number <strong>of</strong> other people who may request to be represented<br />

<strong>by</strong> the law<br />

investigated or indicted in the future in a related matter.<br />

In addition, in the field <strong>of</strong> , the lawyer or law firm<br />

accepting a client not only <strong>of</strong>ten forecloses representation <strong>of</strong> any other parties involved in<br />

the pending transactions, but may also be precluded in the future from representing other<br />

major clients in transactions that come to fruition years later.<br />

account for the special knowledge, experience and ability an attorney may have already<br />

acquired on an issue or area <strong>of</strong> the law, which might otherwise have to be gathered at the<br />

expense <strong>of</strong> a client with a less<br />

legitimate bases for<br />

justifying nonrefundable retainers.<br />

Setting out in a fee the fee agreement does not alter the client'<br />

right to terminate the (see Rule 1.5(e)(iv)) and also that the<br />

client " may be entitled to a refund" (see Rule<br />

lawyer, have the lawyer work on the case for<br />

lawyer without cause, demand a refund, and then prevent the lawyer from<br />

anyone else in the litigation or<br />

permitted to terminate the lawyer for cause, the lawyer and the client should also be free<br />

to ensure that a satisfactory fee arrangement has been negotiated to cover the contingency<br />

<strong>of</strong> a discharge without good cause. This problem is further<br />

the true retainer the lawyer must be<br />

compensated for "any services provided. See Comment (8). The small fee<br />

availability will most <strong>of</strong>ten never compensate the lawyer or law firm for being unable to<br />

represent anyone else related to the case.<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!