The conservation of tigers and other wildlife in oil palm plantations
The conservation of tigers and other wildlife in oil palm plantations The conservation of tigers and other wildlife in oil palm plantations
Table 11 - Summary of all known tigers in and around the plantation 2002-4 ID Status Sex Age Area Notes Flash Resident Male Adult Jammer Tulen, Probably father of Wendy’s cubs. NW Asialog Not been photographed since March following regular photographs previously. Wendy Resident Female Adult Jammer Tulen, Bred at least twice. Often near palm border, oil palm habitat. NW Asialog - Wendy cub Unknown 1st litter present when project A1 began. Photographed once whilst with mother. - Wendy cub Unknown 1st litter present when project A2 began. Photographed twice whilst with mother. By Nov 01 looked fully grown but still with mother. - Wendy cub Unknown 2nd litter born ~ April 2002. Seen B1 by scouts in August 2002 but no camera-trap records. Tracks indicate not all three survived? - Wendy cub 2nd litter born ~ April 2002. Seen B2 by scouts in August 2002 but no camera-trap records. Tracks indicate not all three survived? - Wendy cub 2nd litter born ~ April 2002. Seen B3 by scouts in August 2002 but no camera-trap records. Tracks indicate not all three survived? Shakira Female? Young adult? NW Asialog Possibly Wendy cub A1. Definitely not A2. Stripe patterns similar to Wendy Subuh Female? Unknown Jammer Tulen Photographed once in 2001. Stripes similar to Wendy and seen in her area. Cub from previous litter? Unidentified 1 Female Young adult? Jammer Tulen Possibly other side of Shakira – stripes similar Unidentified 2 Unknown Unknown Jammer Tulen Can’t match but poor quality Slamet Male Adult, Bungin, NE Radio collared in May 2003. 6-7 yrs Asialog, at least Lost collar in Dec 2003 / Jan 2004 once in Jammer Tulen Tiga Jari Resident Female Adult Bungin, prob. Three toes on one foot NE Asialog Eve Tiga Jari Female Sub adult Bungin Originally seen associated with cub A1 Tiga Jari in Bungin – probably her cub. Mambo Tiga Jari Unknown Sub adult Bungin, Originally seen associated with cub A2 Jammer Tulen Tiga Jari in Bungin – probably her cub. Last seen in Jammer Tulen. Mo Resident? Female Adult? Asialog, Never seen inside the plantation. south of Bungin Seen on a camera-trap that Slamet also appears on within 24 hours of one another. Wildlife conservation in oil palm plantations 35
Table 12 - Estimated tiger densities from photo-trapping rates 2001-2 Year Tiger photos Trapping effort Photos/trap night Trap nights/photo Density (tigers/100 sq.km) 2001 14 214 0.0700 15 11.98 2002 22 251 0.0700 11 16.66 Ranging patterns Ranging patterns were investigated using camera-trap data for all individuals and radio tracking from a single, adult male captured in 2003 and tracked for six months before his collar slipped off. Both methods showed extensive use of the plantation concession and forest concession by almost all resident tigers, the exception being Tiga Jari who lived on the border with the forest but was never detected outside the plantation concession. Calculated ranges were similar for both methods for the other three, showing tigers were ranging over at least 14km 2 . However, these results are likely to be highly limited by camera placement (which was not designed to measure home range) and tracking ability in forest (where the signal was never picked up) and these are not considered to represent complete ranges (Figure 23, Table 13). Figure 23 - Tiger ranges (calculated from camera-trap data and radio tracking fixes where available) for the four most photographed individuals 36 Wildlife conservation in oil palm plantations
- Page 1 and 2: ZSL Conservation Report No.7 The co
- Page 3 and 4: The conservation of tigers and othe
- Page 5 and 6: importance of marginal or degraded
- Page 7 and 8: tersebut masih ada dalam populasi y
- Page 9 and 10: The value of degraded land 44 Impli
- Page 11 and 12: INTRODUCTION Protected areas and co
- Page 13 and 14: survival (Western, 1989). Consequen
- Page 15 and 16: However, in Indonesia the potential
- Page 17 and 18: Environmental impact of oil palm Oi
- Page 19 and 20: Figure 3 - Land use within the stud
- Page 21 and 22: Non-random camera placement Cameras
- Page 23 and 24: Captured animals were anaesthetised
- Page 25 and 26: Species survival within a human-dom
- Page 27 and 28: Table 3 - Conservation and protecti
- Page 29 and 30: Figure 15 - Distribution maps based
- Page 31 and 32: Species survival within the plantat
- Page 33 and 34: Evidence of persistence in oil palm
- Page 35 and 36: Figure 19 - Distribution of species
- Page 37: Figure 22 - Ranges for two wild pig
- Page 41 and 42: Tigers on the plantation 2003-2006
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 26 - Summary of individual t
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 27 - Examples of conservatio
- Page 47 and 48: occasionally and usually on the edg
- Page 49 and 50: forest, unprotected or unknown area
- Page 51 and 52: left unplanted, they will be more v
- Page 53 and 54: The final decision is how to manage
- Page 55 and 56: Figure 30 Information Box 1: The RS
- Page 57 and 58: Integrating oil palm management int
- Page 59 and 60: consumers). Engaging communities on
- Page 61 and 62: REFERENCES Arcese, P. and Sinclair,
- Page 63 and 64: RSPO (2006). RSPO Principles and Cr
- Page 65 and 66: APPENDIX II Birds recorded opportun
Table 12 - Estimated tiger densities from photo-trapp<strong>in</strong>g rates 2001-2<br />
Year Tiger photos Trapp<strong>in</strong>g effort Photos/trap night Trap nights/photo Density (<strong>tigers</strong>/100 sq.km)<br />
2001 14 214 0.0700 15 11.98<br />
2002 22 251 0.0700 11 16.66<br />
Rang<strong>in</strong>g patterns<br />
Rang<strong>in</strong>g patterns were <strong>in</strong>vestigated<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g camera-trap data for all<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>and</strong> radio track<strong>in</strong>g from a<br />
s<strong>in</strong>gle, adult male captured <strong>in</strong> 2003 <strong>and</strong><br />
tracked for six months before his collar<br />
slipped <strong>of</strong>f. Both methods showed<br />
extensive use <strong>of</strong> the plantation<br />
concession <strong>and</strong> forest concession by<br />
almost all resident <strong>tigers</strong>, the<br />
exception be<strong>in</strong>g Tiga Jari who lived on<br />
the border with the forest but was<br />
never detected outside the plantation<br />
concession. Calculated ranges were similar for both methods for the <strong>other</strong> three,<br />
show<strong>in</strong>g <strong>tigers</strong> were rang<strong>in</strong>g over at least 14km 2<br />
. However, these results are likely to<br />
be highly limited by camera placement (which was not designed to measure home<br />
range) <strong>and</strong> track<strong>in</strong>g ability <strong>in</strong> forest (where the signal was never picked up) <strong>and</strong> these<br />
are not considered to represent complete ranges (Figure 23, Table 13).<br />
Figure 23 - Tiger ranges (calculated from camera-trap data <strong>and</strong> radio track<strong>in</strong>g fixes where<br />
available) for the four most photographed <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
36 Wildlife <strong>conservation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>oil</strong> <strong>palm</strong> <strong>plantations</strong>
Change language