09.08.2013 Views

MACHIAVellIAnIsM, UnetHICAl BeHAVIoR, AnD Well-BeIng In ...

MACHIAVellIAnIsM, UnetHICAl BeHAVIoR, AnD Well-BeIng In ...

MACHIAVellIAnIsM, UnetHICAl BeHAVIoR, AnD Well-BeIng In ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

190 DAHLING, KUyUMCU, AND LIBRIzzI<br />

Restubog, Scott, and zagenczyk (2011) found an increase in supervisor-directed deviance among<br />

individuals who had experienced abusive supervision. Reductions in job performance and increases<br />

in workplace strife can have serious consequences for the prosperous operation and financial success<br />

of the organization. <strong>In</strong> summary, the available evidence suggests that the aggregate result of<br />

Machiavellian unethical behavior unfolding in dyadic relationships and work groups may be the<br />

compromised well-being and performance of the entire organization.<br />

FUtURe ReseARCH DIReCtIons on <strong>MACHIAVellIAnIsM</strong> <strong>AnD</strong><br />

<strong>Well</strong>-<strong>Be<strong>In</strong>g</strong><br />

Although an impressive body of evidence has documented the detrimental effects of Machiavellian<br />

unethical behaviors on well-being, additional research is needed to clarify several issues. Most<br />

important, future research should expand beyond a focus on either Machiavellian individuals or<br />

dyadic relationships to explore how Machiavellianism impacts the broader social network and<br />

organizational performance criteria. Most research to date has drawn inferences about how Machiavellian<br />

behavior might poison the broader organization, but evidence of these consequences<br />

is limited.<br />

Social network analysis (Borgatti and Foster, 2003) offers a particularly fruitful approach for<br />

answering these questions. Social network analysis involves mapping the social relationships between<br />

people in an identifiable organization to examine how tangible and social assets (knowledge,<br />

trust, liking, etc.) are shared. <strong>In</strong> a social network, individual power is a consequence of having<br />

many connections in a relatively sparse network full of structural holes. <strong>In</strong> such a context, powerful<br />

people have access to resources and are able to broker relationships between other people who<br />

would otherwise be unconnected. We expect that Machiavellians seek to find and occupy these<br />

strategic positions that bridge structural holes to keep themselves well-informed and important in<br />

the social network. This idea is broadly consistent with some findings that show that Machiavellianism<br />

only contributes to performance as tenure increases, which suggests that Machiavellian<br />

employees need time to strategically embed themselves in the social network of an organization<br />

before they can capitalize on their motivations and become successful (Dahling, Whitaker,<br />

and Levy, 2009). Notably, such an arrangement is detrimental to the overall health of the social<br />

network, as denser networks with fewer structural holes allow for a freer exchange of resources<br />

and information where they are needed to enhance organizational productivity. Future research<br />

on social networks could compellingly demonstrate how Machiavellian employees threaten the<br />

organization by perpetuating ineffective social arrangements that best serve themselves.<br />

Another important direction for future research concerns the Machiavellianism exhibited by<br />

top leaders who are in key positions to impact organizational success. The limited research on<br />

Machiavellian leaders has presented mixed evidence about when Machiavellian leadership will<br />

detract from organizational well-being. For example, Deluga (2001) found that Machiavellianism<br />

(as inferred from historical profiles) was positively related to ratings of charisma and performance<br />

among all past American presidents. Evidence from lab studies also suggests that Machiavellian<br />

leaders can be highly adaptive in uncertain contexts and that they adopt a task-oriented style to<br />

help clarify objectives. However, Machiavellian leaders also tend to be very inconsiderate of followers,<br />

ineffective when resolving group conflicts, and easily frustrated when faced with tasks that<br />

are unfavorable or difficult (Drory and G>). Despite these important preliminary findings, little<br />

is known about Machiavellianism and its effects among real business leaders, which is a critical<br />

shortcoming of the literature. Future research should focus on how leader Machiavellianism<br />

impacts both internal and external organizational criteria, such as the development of an ethical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!