AT&T Wholesale Agreement - AT&T Clec Online
AT&T Wholesale Agreement - AT&T Clec Online
AT&T Wholesale Agreement - AT&T Clec Online
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Page 45 of 94<br />
General Terms and Conditions/AT&T LOUISIANA<br />
Page 44 of 46<br />
Cricket Communications, Inc.<br />
Version: 2Q09 – Two-Way CMRS ICA - Wireless – 05/05/09<br />
Interconnection products and/or services. Except as agreed upon in writing, neither Party shall be required to<br />
provide the other Party a function, Facility, product, service or arrangement described in the Act that is not expressly<br />
provided herein.<br />
38.2 Except as specifically contained herein or provided by the FCC or any Commission within its lawful jurisdiction,<br />
nothing in this <strong>Agreement</strong> shall be deemed to affect any access charge arrangement.<br />
39.0 Amendments and Modifications<br />
39.1 Except as otherwise provided for in this <strong>Agreement</strong>, no provision of this <strong>Agreement</strong> shall be deemed amended or<br />
modified by either Party unless such an amendment or modification is in writing, dated, and signed by an authorized<br />
representative of both Parties.<br />
39.2 If Sprint prevails in a final and effective order in Docket No. U-31350 (“Final Award”) on any issue that is noted in this<br />
<strong>Agreement</strong> as being subject to modification, based upon a Sprint win, then Cricket may amend this <strong>Agreement</strong> to<br />
include language that is consistent with the Sprint arbitration win (“Sprint Win”). Any such amendment shall be<br />
executed within thirty (30) days after Cricket requests such an amendment. Cricket’s right to amend this <strong>Agreement</strong><br />
shall arise no later than the date by which the state commission renders a Final Award, on the merits, concerning any<br />
Sprint Win. The Parties may agree to delay implementation of an amendment, incorporating language consistent<br />
with a Sprint Win, if the Final Award is subject to a request for reconsideration or rehearing, or if all administrative<br />
agency appeals at the state commission have not been exhausted. For the avoidance of doubt, the initiation of any<br />
litigation between Sprint and AT&T, concerning a Sprint Win, or any other arbitrated issue, or related issue, shall not<br />
limit Cricket’s ability to amend this <strong>Agreement</strong>, pursuant to this Section. If a Sprint Win on which an amendment to<br />
this <strong>Agreement</strong>, under this Section was based is overturned on appeal in a proceeding conducted pursuant to 47<br />
U.S.C. § 252(e)(6), then an amendment to this <strong>Agreement</strong> reflecting the district court’s decision will be executed<br />
within thirty (30) days after entry of the district court’s final judgment. If the district court’s decision is reversed or<br />
otherwise modified on appeal, then an amendment to this <strong>Agreement</strong> reflecting that reversal or modification will be<br />
executed within thirty (30) days after entry of the appellate court’s decision.<br />
39.2.1 The Parties agree that any Sprint Win on any issue concerning the calculation of an appropriate traffic factor<br />
for originating landline-to-mobile interMTA traffic shall require an amendment to the <strong>Agreement</strong> which<br />
reflects the specific minutes of use exchanged between AT&T and Cricket in Louisiana. As such, the<br />
Parties agree to work in good faith to negotiate a land-to-mobile interMTA traffic factor, based upon traffic<br />
studies prepared by either Party.<br />
39.2.2 The Parties agree that any Sprint Win on any issue concerning the exchange of transit traffic shall require<br />
an amendment to the <strong>Agreement</strong> pursuant to section 39.2 above. An amendment incorporating such terms<br />
into the <strong>Agreement</strong> may also necessitate an amendment to the Parties’ existing commercial transit<br />
agreement.<br />
39.3 Notwithstanding the process set forth in Section 39.2, above, if at any time Sprint negotiates language with AT&T that<br />
resolves an issue that is identical to or substantially similar to an issue that is identified in this <strong>Agreement</strong> as being<br />
subject to modification based on a Sprint Win (“Sprint Negotiation”), then Cricket may amend this <strong>Agreement</strong> to<br />
include language that is consistent with Sprint’s negotiated language, after the AT&T/Sprint interconnection<br />
agreement is approved by the state commission. An amendment to incorporate language from a Sprint Negotiation<br />
shall be executed within thirty (30) days after Cricket requests such an amendment. Further, the Parties<br />
acknowledge that any Sprint Negotiation result may be incorporated into the terms of the Parties’ successor<br />
agreements prior to their effective date (January 1, 2012). The Parties shall work cooperatively to amend such<br />
agreements and file such amendments with the appropriate State Commission, as may be necessary.<br />
39.4 The Parties shall work cooperatively to ensure the timely and orderly implementation of any amendments arising out<br />
of either Party’s obligations under this Section 39. AT&T shall work cooperatively with Cricket to provide timely<br />
information concerning all Sprint Wins and agreements resulting from Sprint Negotiations, and shall provide to<br />
Cricket and its counsel data, information and other facts or support that may be necessary to implement this section<br />
39 including, but not limited to, immediate notice to Cricket, of any resolution of disputes with Sprint that is<br />
Page 45 of 105