Copyright 2012 Aileen M. Echiverri-Cohen - University of Washington

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 9 Parameter Estimates, Standard Errors for Age, Gender, and Education Predicting Changes in AB and PPI AB PPI Lag 4 Lag 5 30 ms 60 ms Variable B SE B T Sig. B SE B T Sig. B SE B T Sig. B SE B T Sig. Age Gender Education * p = .05 .002 .001 2.22 .03* -.004 0 -.1 .89 -.3 .93 -.3 .75 .04 .96 -.1 .96 -.03 .03 -.9 .38 .03 .04 .64 .53 -20.9 26.1 -.8 .43 10.09 26.6 .38 .71 0 .004 -.8 .43 -.002 .01 -.5 .63 8.29 2.72 3.05 .5 3.78 3.25 1.16 .26 78
% Accuracy 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 Responder status equals mean Rate <strong>of</strong> Change Responder status 1 unit above mean Figure 1. Treatment response, treatment, and time for Lag 3 <strong>of</strong> AB PE SER 79
Page 1 and 2:
©Copyright 2012 Aileen M. Echiverr
Page 3 and 4:
University of Washington Abstract A
Page 5 and 6:
Page TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figu
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table Number Page 1
Page 9 and 10:
ain regions associated with a wide
Page 11 and 12:
studies show a correspondence betwe
Page 13 and 14:
Lavie et al., 2004; Vogel, Woodman,
Page 15 and 16:
Echiverri, & Grillon; 2006). Given
Page 17 and 18:
an increase in verbal memory and im
Page 19 and 20:
cingulate gyrus and left frontal lo
Page 21 and 22:
Reserve University (R01MH066348) th
Page 23 and 24:
not report normal or corrected-to-n
Page 25 and 26:
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS; Shee
Page 27 and 28:
There were four types of startle st
Page 29 and 30:
videotapes of SER sessions. For thi
Page 31 and 32: magnitude on the no prepulse trials
Page 33 and 34: Spinella & Miley, 2004) were examin
Page 35 and 36: For the treatment modality and trea
Page 37 and 38: Data Analytic Strategy Treatment Mo
Page 39 and 40: The relationship between treatment
Page 41 and 42: Prepulse Inhibition of Startle. Con
Page 43 and 44: from PE than those that made less i
Page 45 and 46: attentional inhibitory functioning
Page 47 and 48: inhibitory inputs and ultimately de
Page 49 and 50: shown to modify attentional process
Page 51 and 52: and may not be regained. Indeed, ol
Page 53 and 54: Miyake, 2004) and further construct
Page 55 and 56: REFERENCES Araki, T., Kasai, K., Ya
Page 57 and 58: attention and working memory. Psych
Page 59 and 60: Optimizing inhibitory learning duri
Page 61 and 62: Friedman, M., Davidson, J., & Stine
Page 63 and 64: during continuous performance task:
Page 65 and 66: tell us about the treatment of post
Page 67 and 68: Paige, S. R., Reid, G. M., Allen, M
Page 69 and 70: Attention and regional cerebral blo
Page 71 and 72: Tasca, G.A., & Gallop, R. (2009). M
Page 73 and 74: Table 1 Summary of Participant Char
Page 75 and 76: Table 3 Pre-treatment and Post-trea
Page 77 and 78: Table 5 Correlations between AB and
Page 79 and 80: Table 6 Parameter Estimates, Standa
Page 81: Table 8 Correlations Between Age, G
show all

Copyright 2012 Aileen M. Echiverri-Cohen - University of Washington

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?