Copyright 2012 Aileen M. Echiverri-Cohen - University of Washington

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2 Psychopathology and Functioning Measures at Pre-treatment, Post-treatment, and Follow- up Psychopathology Pre-treatment Post-treatment Follow-up M SE M SE M SE PTSD (PSS-I) 28.04 1.01 11.16 1.58 10.21 1.61 Depression (BDI) 25.76 1.42 10.49 1.87 11.35 1.85 State Anxiety (STAI-S) 56.53 1.79 42.41 2.18 39.41 2.58 Trait Anxiety (STAI-T) 60.05 1.5 43.53 2.06 43.99 2.44 Dissociation (DES) 14.43 2.02 11.15 2.08 10.71 2.25 Func Impair (Sheehan) 18.32 1.01 11.18 1.46 4.51 1.75 Note. n =49. Func Impair=Functional Impairment. 70
Table 3 Pre-treatment and Post-treatment AB and PPI AB (% Accuracy) Pre-treatment Post-treatment M SE M SE Lag 1 .96 .01 .95 .01 Lag 2 .80 .03 .82 .03 Lag 3 .79 .03 .83 .03 Lag 4 .86 .02 .89 .02 Lag 5 .90 .02 .94 .01 PPI (% Change Score) 30 ms 13.43 7.24 -7.60 7.54 60 ms 18.26 7.60 5.00 9.29 120 ms 16.43 6.81 4.18 6.64 Note. n =49. AB = Attentional blink, PPI = Prepulse Inhibition. 71
Page 1 and 2:
©Copyright 2012 Aileen M. Echiverr
Page 3 and 4:
University of Washington Abstract A
Page 5 and 6:
Page TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figu
Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table Number Page 1
Page 9 and 10:
ain regions associated with a wide
Page 11 and 12:
studies show a correspondence betwe
Page 13 and 14:
Lavie et al., 2004; Vogel, Woodman,
Page 15 and 16:
Echiverri, & Grillon; 2006). Given
Page 17 and 18:
an increase in verbal memory and im
Page 19 and 20:
cingulate gyrus and left frontal lo
Page 21 and 22:
Reserve University (R01MH066348) th
Page 23 and 24: not report normal or corrected-to-n
Page 25 and 26: Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS; Shee
Page 27 and 28: There were four types of startle st
Page 29 and 30: videotapes of SER sessions. For thi
Page 31 and 32: magnitude on the no prepulse trials
Page 33 and 34: Spinella & Miley, 2004) were examin
Page 35 and 36: For the treatment modality and trea
Page 37 and 38: Data Analytic Strategy Treatment Mo
Page 39 and 40: The relationship between treatment
Page 41 and 42: Prepulse Inhibition of Startle. Con
Page 43 and 44: from PE than those that made less i
Page 45 and 46: attentional inhibitory functioning
Page 47 and 48: inhibitory inputs and ultimately de
Page 49 and 50: shown to modify attentional process
Page 51 and 52: and may not be regained. Indeed, ol
Page 53 and 54: Miyake, 2004) and further construct
Page 55 and 56: REFERENCES Araki, T., Kasai, K., Ya
Page 57 and 58: attention and working memory. Psych
Page 59 and 60: Optimizing inhibitory learning duri
Page 61 and 62: Friedman, M., Davidson, J., & Stine
Page 63 and 64: during continuous performance task:
Page 65 and 66: tell us about the treatment of post
Page 67 and 68: Paige, S. R., Reid, G. M., Allen, M
Page 69 and 70: Attention and regional cerebral blo
Page 71 and 72: Tasca, G.A., & Gallop, R. (2009). M
Page 73: Table 1 Summary of Participant Char
Page 77 and 78: Table 5 Correlations between AB and
Page 79 and 80: Table 6 Parameter Estimates, Standa
Page 81 and 82: Table 8 Correlations Between Age, G
Page 83: % Accuracy 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.
show all

Copyright 2012 Aileen M. Echiverri-Cohen - University of Washington

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?