Vogel, E., Luck, S., & Shapiro, K. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus <strong>of</strong> suppression during the attentional blink. Journal <strong>of</strong> Experimental Psychological Human Perceptual Performance, 24, 656–1674. Vogel, E., Woodman, G. & Luck, S. (2005). Pushing around the locus <strong>of</strong> selection: Evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis. Journal <strong>of</strong> Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1907-1922. Weber, D., Clark, C., McFarlane, A., Moores, K., Morris, P., & Egan, G. (2005). Abnormal frontal and parietal activity during working memory updating in posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 140, 27-44. Weichselgartner, E., & Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics <strong>of</strong> automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238, 778-780. Whalen, P., Bush, G., McNally, R., Wilhelm, S., McInerney, S., Jenike, M., et al. (1998). The emotional counting Stroop paradigm: A functional magnetic resonance imaging probe <strong>of</strong> the anterior cingulated affective division. Biological Psychiatry, 44, 1219-1228. Wu, M. F., Krueger, J., Ison, J. R., & Gerrard, R. L. (1984). Startle reflex inhibition in the rat: its persistence after extended repetition <strong>of</strong> the inhibitory stimulus. Journal <strong>of</strong> Experimental Psychology, 10, 221-228. Wynn, J. K., Breitmeyer, B., Nuechterlein, K. H., & Green, M. F. (2006). Exploring the short term visual store in schizophrenia using the attentional blink. Journal <strong>of</strong> Psychiatric Research, 40(7), 599-605. Wynn, J. K., Schell, A. M., & Dawson, M. E. (1996). Effects <strong>of</strong> prehabituation <strong>of</strong> the prepulse on startle eyeblink modification. Psychophysiology, 33(Suppl.), S92. 68
Table 1 Summary <strong>of</strong> Participant Characteristics Characteristic Total Sample (N = 49) PE (n = 29) SER (n = 20) M SD M SD M SD Age 37.69 12.8 37.08 12.61 40.95 13.05 Gender (% Female) 74.5 81.5 65.0 Race Caucasian (%) 66.7 71.4 61.1 African American (%) 20.5 19.0 22.2 Asian (%) 5.1 9.5 0.0 Other (%) 7.7 0.0 16.7 Education level (yrs) 15.05 3.42 15.8 3.81 14.05 2.61 Cognitive ability (Shipley) 62.01 14.09 64.34 14.39 58.62 13.50 Years since trauma 12.5 12.77 13.08 12.00 13.32 14.13 Trauma Type (%) Child Sexual Assault 22.4 24.1 20.0 Child Physical Assault 8.2 10.3 5.0 Sexual Assault 30.6 31.0 30.0 Physical Assault 26.5 24.1 30.0 Motor Vehicle Accident 6.1 10.3 0.0 Natural Disaster 4.1 0.0 10.0 Death <strong>of</strong> Loved One 2.0 0.0 5.0 69
- Page 1 and 2:
©Copyright 2012 Aileen M. Echiverr
- Page 3 and 4:
University of Washington Abstract A
- Page 5 and 6:
Page TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figu
- Page 7 and 8:
LIST OF TABLES Table Number Page 1
- Page 9 and 10:
ain regions associated with a wide
- Page 11 and 12:
studies show a correspondence betwe
- Page 13 and 14:
Lavie et al., 2004; Vogel, Woodman,
- Page 15 and 16:
Echiverri, & Grillon; 2006). Given
- Page 17 and 18:
an increase in verbal memory and im
- Page 19 and 20:
cingulate gyrus and left frontal lo
- Page 21 and 22: Reserve University (R01MH066348) th
- Page 23 and 24: not report normal or corrected-to-n
- Page 25 and 26: Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS; Shee
- Page 27 and 28: There were four types of startle st
- Page 29 and 30: videotapes of SER sessions. For thi
- Page 31 and 32: magnitude on the no prepulse trials
- Page 33 and 34: Spinella & Miley, 2004) were examin
- Page 35 and 36: For the treatment modality and trea
- Page 37 and 38: Data Analytic Strategy Treatment Mo
- Page 39 and 40: The relationship between treatment
- Page 41 and 42: Prepulse Inhibition of Startle. Con
- Page 43 and 44: from PE than those that made less i
- Page 45 and 46: attentional inhibitory functioning
- Page 47 and 48: inhibitory inputs and ultimately de
- Page 49 and 50: shown to modify attentional process
- Page 51 and 52: and may not be regained. Indeed, ol
- Page 53 and 54: Miyake, 2004) and further construct
- Page 55 and 56: REFERENCES Araki, T., Kasai, K., Ya
- Page 57 and 58: attention and working memory. Psych
- Page 59 and 60: Optimizing inhibitory learning duri
- Page 61 and 62: Friedman, M., Davidson, J., & Stine
- Page 63 and 64: during continuous performance task:
- Page 65 and 66: tell us about the treatment of post
- Page 67 and 68: Paige, S. R., Reid, G. M., Allen, M
- Page 69 and 70: Attention and regional cerebral blo
- Page 71: Tasca, G.A., & Gallop, R. (2009). M
- Page 75 and 76: Table 3 Pre-treatment and Post-trea
- Page 77 and 78: Table 5 Correlations between AB and
- Page 79 and 80: Table 6 Parameter Estimates, Standa
- Page 81 and 82: Table 8 Correlations Between Age, G
- Page 83: % Accuracy 0.04 0.035 0.03 0.025 0.