09.08.2013 Views

Copyright 2012 Aileen M. Echiverri-Cohen - University of Washington

Copyright 2012 Aileen M. Echiverri-Cohen - University of Washington

Copyright 2012 Aileen M. Echiverri-Cohen - University of Washington

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS; Sheehan, 1986) assesses disruption caused by symptoms<br />

in work, social activities, and home life. SDS uses an 11-point scale to evaluate disability in<br />

each <strong>of</strong> these three areas, ranging from 0 (not at all) to 10 (very severely). A global functional<br />

impairment score reflecting total impairment in work, social, and home functioning was used.<br />

The scale shows adequate reliability and construct validity (Leon, Shear, Portera, & Klerman,<br />

1992).<br />

Shipley Institute <strong>of</strong> Living Scale (Shipley, 1967) is a 60-item, self-administered test that<br />

assesses cognitive functioning in areas <strong>of</strong> verbal intelligence and abstract reasoning ability.<br />

Scores from the verbal intelligence and abstract reasoning subscales yield a composite score for<br />

the full scale (Paulson & Lin, 1970). The composite score <strong>of</strong> the two subscales was used to<br />

assess the effects <strong>of</strong> general cognitive ability. The measure shows good convergent validity with<br />

the Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale, (Kaufman, 1990).<br />

Materials<br />

Attentional blink. To provide a behavioral measure <strong>of</strong> temporal inhibition, a visual AB<br />

task was used (Raymond et al., 1992). Specifically, AB was made up <strong>of</strong> sequences with one or<br />

two visual targets (T) embedded in a stream <strong>of</strong> 16 to 20 distractors (D), referred to as rapid serial<br />

visual presentation (RSVP). The target set (T1, T2) consisted <strong>of</strong> letters (ACEJKRTY), and the<br />

distractor set consisted <strong>of</strong> numerals (23456789). AB was assessed using dual target trials that<br />

involved identification <strong>of</strong> two targets, where T1 was separated from T2 by 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 serial<br />

positions, which was defined as the lag length (L1 - L5). Lag length was defined as the interval<br />

with 1 to 4 distractors separating a target from a distractor.<br />

AB presentation was controlled by Eprime s<strong>of</strong>tware v 1.0 (Psychology S<strong>of</strong>tware Tools,<br />

Inc.) and presented on a 17-inch Dell monitor. All stimuli were presented in size 48 Times New<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!