Agenda and Meeting Materials - UConn School of Medicine ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

AAC ra3fies or makes a more stringent CGC’s plan Diagram 2 CGC recommends grade and/or remedia3on program Student does not appeal Academic plan or disciplinary decision is put into ac3on Student appeals Ad Hoc Appeals Commi9ee hears the appeal Decision is modified Decision is upheld Student does not appeal Plan put into effect Disciplinary issue comes to light AAC makes a decision on a disciplinary ac3on Student appeals SEARC makes a recommenda3on to the dean Dean makes final dispensa3on Education Council March 21, 2013 Page 7
5.G. Student Appeals Students may appeal decisions made by the Course Grading Committee (CGC) that are ratified by the Academic Advancement Committee (AAC) related to course grades, remediation programs and promotion. Students may appeal decisions made by the AAC concerning all disciplinary actions and mandates. The appeals process is detailed in section V. Appeals. The various regulations and rules concerning the appeals process can be found in VI. Rules on Appeals. Students are urged to make themselves familiar with the process. If an appeal of an AAC decision is granted, the appeal will be heard by the Ad Hoc Appeals Committee. The student can appeal a decision of the Ad Hoc Appeals Committee. Appeals of the Ad Hoc Appeals Committee decision will be heard/evaluated by the Student Evaluation and Appeals Review Committee (SEARC). Whether an appeal of the Ad Hoc Appeals Committee is granted is at the discretion of a three-‐person committee called together by the Senior Associate Dean for Education. Each of the levels of appeals is described in the sections below. The Associate Dean for Student Affairs will guide the student through the process at all levels. I. Grading/Remediation Decisions The CGC recommends courses of action on all issues concerning grading and remediation. These recommendations are then ratified by the AAC, which can endorse the plan or can make it more stringent. The AAC cannot make the recommendation less onerous than that suggested by CGC. If the student accepts the plan, the decision of the AAC will be put into effect (see APP 5.C. Course Grading Committee). The student is allowed to appeal the decision to an ad hoc appeals committee, as detailed in III. Ad Hoc Appeals Committee. For additional information on how to submit an appeal and rules concerning appeals, see section V. Appeals Process. II. Disciplinary Decisions The AAC decides on disciplinary action against a student for academic and nonacademic issues, as well as professional concerns related to a student both within the curriculum and outside of it. Students are notified in writing of all AAC decisions (see APP 5.D. Academic Advancement Committee). The student is allowed to appeal the decision to an ad hoc appeals committee, as detailed in III. Ad Hoc Appeals Committee. For additional information on appeals, see section V. Appeals Process. Education Council March 21, 2013 Page 8
Page 1 and 2: Approval of the minutes • Februar
Page 3 and 4: • The C to P or F to P would be a
Page 5 and 6: Faculty Council (Storrs). • Admis
Page 7: Student does not appeal AAC agrees
Page 11 and 12: 1. The student must be able to pres
Page 13 and 14: VI. Rules Concerning Appeals Upon r
Page 15 and 16: Table of Contents I. Curriculum Gov
Page 17 and 18: How Do You Use CHIPS? What is the C
Page 19 and 20: Appendix D: University of Connectic
Page 21 and 22: identify him/herself in case furthe
Page 23 and 24: The PRB shall consist of 5 voting m
Page 25 and 26: will also be responsible for inform
Page 27 and 28: APPENDIX E: University of Connectic
Page 29 and 30: Appendix F: University of Connectic
Page 31 and 32: Professionalism Task Force Updates
Page 33: Committee on Community and Continui

Agenda and Meeting Materials - UConn School of Medicine ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?