The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral
The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral
The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1503 MANUAL OFPATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE<br />
<strong>or</strong>namentation upon the article, <strong>or</strong> both. Both design<br />
and utility patents may be obtained on an article if<br />
invention resides both in its utility and <strong>or</strong>namental<br />
appearance.<br />
While utility and design patents aff<strong>or</strong>dlegally separate<br />
protection, the utility and <strong>or</strong>namentality of an<br />
article may not be easily separable. An invention may<br />
have a blend of functional aspect and <strong>or</strong>namental<br />
design.<br />
Some of the m<strong>or</strong>e common differences between<br />
design and utility patents are summarized below:<br />
(A) <strong>The</strong> term of a utility patent on an application<br />
filed on <strong>or</strong> after June 8, 1995 is 20 years measured<br />
from the U.S. filing date; <strong>or</strong> if the application contains<br />
a specific reference to an earlier application under<br />
35 U.S.C. 120, 121, <strong>or</strong> 365(c), 20 years from the earliest<br />
effective U.S. filing date, while the term of a<br />
design patent is 14 years measured from the date of<br />
grant (see 35 U.S.c. 173).<br />
(B) Maintenance fees are required f<strong>or</strong> utility patents.(see<br />
37 CFR 1.20), while no maintenance fees are<br />
required f<strong>or</strong> design patents.<br />
(C) Design patent applications include only a single<br />
claim, while utility patent applications can have<br />
multiple claims.<br />
(D) Restriction between plural, distinct inventions<br />
is discretionary on the part of the examiner in utility<br />
patent applications (see MPEP § 803), while it is mandat<strong>or</strong>y<br />
in design patent applications (see MPEP<br />
§ 1504.05).<br />
(E) An international application naming varions<br />
countries may be filed f<strong>or</strong> utility patents under the<br />
<strong>Patent</strong> Cooperation Treaty (PCT), while no such provision<br />
exists f<strong>or</strong> design patents.<br />
(F) F<strong>or</strong>eign pri<strong>or</strong>ity under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d)<br />
can be obtained f<strong>or</strong> the filing of utility patent applications<br />
up to I year after the first filing in any country<br />
subscribing to the Paris Convention, while this period<br />
is only 6 months f<strong>or</strong> design patent applications (see<br />
35 U.S.C. 172).<br />
(0) Utility patent applications may claim the benefit<br />
of a provisional application under 35 U.S.C.<br />
119(e) whereas design patent applications may not.<br />
See 35U.S.C. 172 and 37 CFR 1.78 (a)(4).<br />
(H) A Request f<strong>or</strong> Continued Examination (RCE)<br />
under 37 CFR 1.114 may only be filed in utility and<br />
plant applications filed under 35 U.S.c. 111(a) on <strong>or</strong><br />
August2001<br />
1500-2<br />
after June 8, 1995, while RCE is not available f<strong>or</strong><br />
design applications (see 37 CFR 1.114(e».<br />
(I) Continued prosecution application (CPA)<br />
practice under 37 CFR 1.53(d) is available f<strong>or</strong> design<br />
applications regardless of the filing date of the pri<strong>or</strong><br />
application, but is available f<strong>or</strong> utility and plant applications<br />
only where the pri<strong>or</strong> application has a filing<br />
date pri<strong>or</strong> to May 29, 2000 (see 37 CFR 1.53(d)(I)(i)).<br />
(J) Utility patent applications filed on <strong>or</strong> after<br />
November 29,2000 are subject to application publication<br />
under 35 U.S.C. 122(b)(I)(A), whereas design<br />
applications are riot subject to application publication<br />
(see 35 U.S.C. 122(b)(2».<br />
Other distinctions between design and utility patent<br />
practice are detailed in this chapter. Unless otherwise<br />
provided, the rules f<strong>or</strong> applications f<strong>or</strong> utility patents<br />
are equally applicable to applications f<strong>or</strong> design patents<br />
(35 U.S.C. 171 and 37 CFR1.15l).<br />
1503 Elements of a Design <strong>Patent</strong><br />
Application<br />
A design patentapplication has essentially the elements<br />
required of an application f<strong>or</strong> a utility patent<br />
filed under 35 U.S.C. 101 (see Chapter 600). <strong>The</strong><br />
arrangement of the elements of a design patent application<br />
and the sections of the specification are as<br />
specified in 37 CFR 1.154. .<br />
A claim in a specific f<strong>or</strong>m is a necessary element of<br />
a design patent application. See MPEP § 1503.03.<br />
A drawing is an essential element of a design patent<br />
application. See MPEP § 1503.02 f<strong>or</strong> requirements<br />
f<strong>or</strong> drawings:<br />
1503.01 Specification<br />
37 CFR 1.153. Title, description and claim, oath <strong>or</strong><br />
declaration.<br />
(a)<strong>The</strong> title of the design must designate the particular article.<br />
No description, other than a reference to thedrawing, is <strong>or</strong>dinarily<br />
required. <strong>The</strong> claim shall be in f<strong>or</strong>mal terms to the'<strong>or</strong>namental<br />
design f<strong>or</strong> theartic1e(specifying name) as shown, <strong>or</strong>as shown and<br />
described. M<strong>or</strong>e than 'one claimis neither required n<strong>or</strong>permitted.<br />
(b)<strong>The</strong> oath <strong>or</strong> declaration required of the applicantmust comply<br />
with § 1.63.<br />
37 CFR 1.154. Arrangement ofapplication elements in a<br />
design application.<br />
(a) <strong>The</strong> elements of the' design application, if applicable,<br />
should appearin the following <strong>or</strong>der: