The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral
The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral
The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
aliased pixel illumination intensity data to be displayed<br />
on a display means. This is not a disembodied<br />
mathematical concept which maybe characterized as<br />
an 'abstract idea,' but rather a specific machine to<br />
produce a useful, concrete, and tangible result."); and<br />
State Street, 149 F.3d at 1373, 47 USPQ2d at 1601<br />
("the transf<strong>or</strong>mation of data, representing discrete<br />
dollar amounts, by a machine through a series of<br />
mathematical calculations into a final share price,<br />
constitutes a practical application of a mathematical<br />
alg<strong>or</strong>ithm, f<strong>or</strong>mula, <strong>or</strong> calculation, because it produces<br />
'a useful, concrete and tangible result' - a final<br />
share price momentarily fixed f<strong>or</strong> rec<strong>or</strong>ding and<br />
rep<strong>or</strong>ting purposes and even accepted and relied upon<br />
by regulat<strong>or</strong>y auth<strong>or</strong>ities and in subsequent trades.").<br />
Also see AT&T, 172 F.3d at 1358,50 USPQ2d at 1452<br />
(Claims drawn to a long-distance telephone billing<br />
process containing mathematical alg<strong>or</strong>ithms were<br />
held patentable subject matter because the process<br />
used the alg<strong>or</strong>ithm to produce a useful, concrete, tangible<br />
result without preempting other uses of the<br />
mathematical principle.).<br />
(h) Statut<strong>or</strong>y Process Claims<br />
A claim that requires one <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e acts to be perf<strong>or</strong>med<br />
defines a process. However, not all processes<br />
are statut<strong>or</strong>y under 35 U.S.C. 101. Schrader, 22 F.3d<br />
at 296, 30 USPQ2d at 1460.To be statut<strong>or</strong>y, a claimed<br />
computer-related process must either: (A) result in a<br />
physical transf<strong>or</strong>mation outside the computer f<strong>or</strong><br />
which a practical application in the technological arts<br />
is either disclosed in the specification <strong>or</strong> would have<br />
been known toa skilled artisan (discussed in i)<br />
below), <strong>or</strong> (B) be limited to a practical application<br />
within the technological arts (discussed in ii) below).<br />
See Diamond v.Diehr, 450 U.S. at 183-84, 209 USPQ<br />
at 6 (quoting Cochrane v. Deener, 94 U.S. 780, 787<br />
88 (1877)) ("A [statut<strong>or</strong>y] process is a mode of treatment<br />
of certain materials to produce a given result. It<br />
is an act, <strong>or</strong>a series of acts, perf<strong>or</strong>med upon the subject-matter<br />
to be transf<strong>or</strong>med and reduced to a different<br />
state <strong>or</strong> thing.... <strong>The</strong> process requires that certain<br />
things should be done with certain substances, and in<br />
a certain <strong>or</strong>der; but the tools to be used in doing this<br />
may be of secondary consequence."). See also Alappat,<br />
33 F.3d at 1543, 31 USPQ2d at 1556-57 (quoting<br />
Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. at 192,209 USPQ at 10).<br />
See also id. at 1569, 31 USPQ2d at 1578-79 (New-<br />
PATENTABILITY 2106<br />
man, J., concurring) ("unpatentability of the principle<br />
does not defeat patentability of its practical applications")<br />
(citing O'Reilly v. M<strong>or</strong>se, 56 U.S. (15 How.) at<br />
114-19). If aphysical transf<strong>or</strong>mation occurs outside<br />
the computer, a disclosure that permits a skilled artisanto<br />
practice the claimed invention, i.e., to put it to a<br />
practical use, is sufficient. On the other hand, it is<br />
necessary f<strong>or</strong> the claimed invention taken as a whole<br />
to produce a practical application if there is only a<br />
transf<strong>or</strong>mation of signals <strong>or</strong> data inside a computer <strong>or</strong><br />
if a process merely manipulates concepts <strong>or</strong> converts<br />
one set of numbers into another.<br />
A claimed process is clearly statut<strong>or</strong>y if it results in<br />
a physical transf<strong>or</strong>mation outside the computer, i.e.,<br />
falls into one <strong>or</strong> both of the following specific categ<strong>or</strong>ies<br />
C'safe harb<strong>or</strong>s").<br />
i) Safe Harb<strong>or</strong>s<br />
Independent Physical Acts (Post-Compnter<br />
Process Activity)<br />
A process is statut<strong>or</strong>y if it requires physical acts to<br />
be perf<strong>or</strong>med outside the computer independent of<br />
and following the steps to be. perf<strong>or</strong>med by a programmed<br />
computer, where those acts involve the<br />
manipulation of tangible physical objects and result in<br />
the object having a different physical attribute <strong>or</strong><br />
structure. Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. at 187,<br />
209 USPQ at 8. Thus, if a process claim includes one<br />
<strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e post-computer process steps that result in a<br />
physical transf<strong>or</strong>mation outside the computer (beyond<br />
merely conveying the direct result of the computer<br />
operation), the claim is clearly statut<strong>or</strong>y.<br />
Examples of this type of statut<strong>or</strong>y process include<br />
the following:<br />
- A method of curing rubber in a mold which relies<br />
upon updating process parameters, using a computer<br />
process<strong>or</strong> to determine a time period f<strong>or</strong> curing<br />
the rubber, using the computer process<strong>or</strong> to<br />
determine when the time period has been reached<br />
in the curing process and then opening the mold at<br />
that stage.<br />
- A method of controlling a mechanical robot<br />
which relies.upon st<strong>or</strong>ing data in a computer that<br />
represents various types of mechanical movements<br />
of the robot, using a computer process<strong>or</strong> to calculate<br />
positioning of the robot in relation to given<br />
tasks to be perf<strong>or</strong>med by the robot, and controlling<br />
2100-15 August 2001