The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral
The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral
The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1878.01(a)(1) MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE<br />
1878.01(a)(I) Novelty Under ChapterII<br />
Novelty is defined in peT Article 33(2).<br />
PCTArticle 33.<br />
<strong>The</strong> International Preliminary Examination<br />
*****<br />
(2) F<strong>or</strong> the purposes ofthe international preliminary examination,<br />
a claimed invention shall be considered novel if it is not<br />
anticipated by the pri<strong>or</strong> art as defined in the Regulations.<br />
*****<br />
1878.01(a)(2) Inventive Step<br />
Under Chapter II<br />
Inventive step is defined in PCT Article 33(3).<br />
PCTArticle 33.<br />
<strong>The</strong> International Preliminary Examination<br />
*****<br />
(3) F<strong>or</strong> purposes of the international preliminary examination,a<br />
claimed invention shall be considered to involve an inventive<br />
step if, having regard to the pri<strong>or</strong> art as defined in the<br />
Regulations, it is not, at the prescribed relevant date-obvious to a<br />
person skilled in the art.<br />
*****<br />
PCTRule 65.<br />
Inventive Step <strong>or</strong> Non-Obviousness<br />
65.I.Approach to Pri<strong>or</strong> Art<br />
F<strong>or</strong> the purposes of Article 33(3), the international preliminary<br />
exainination shall take into consideration the relation of any particular<br />
claim to the pri<strong>or</strong> art as a whole. It shall take into consideration<br />
the claim's relation not only to individual documents Of parts<br />
thereof taken separately but also its relation to combinations of<br />
such documents <strong>or</strong> parts of documents, where such combinations<br />
are obvious to a person skilled in the art.<br />
65.2.Relevant Date<br />
F<strong>or</strong> the purposes ofArticle 33(3), the relevant date f<strong>or</strong> the consideration<br />
of inventive step (non-obviousness) is the date prescribed<br />
in Rule 64.\.<br />
1878.01(a)(3) Industrial Applicability<br />
Under Chapter II<br />
Industrial applicability is defined in PCT Article<br />
33(4).<br />
August2001<br />
1800-112<br />
PCTArticle 33.<br />
<strong>The</strong> ·lnternational·Preliminary Examination<br />
*****<br />
(4) F<strong>or</strong> the purposes of the international preliminary examination,<br />
a claimed invention shall be considered industrially applicable<br />
if, acc<strong>or</strong>ding to its nature, it can be made <strong>or</strong> used (in the<br />
technological sense) in any kind of industry. "Industry" shall be<br />
understood in its broadest sense, as in the Paris Convention f<strong>or</strong> the<br />
Protection of Industrial Property.<br />
*****<br />
1878.02 Reply to the Written Opinion<br />
PCTArticle 34.<br />
Procedure bef<strong>or</strong>e the International Preliminary Examining<br />
Auth<strong>or</strong>ity<br />
*****<br />
(Z)(a)<strong>The</strong> applicant shall have a right to communicate <strong>or</strong>ally<br />
and in writing with the International Preliminary Examining<br />
Auth<strong>or</strong>ity.<br />
(b) <strong>The</strong> applicant shall have a right to amend the claims, the<br />
description, and the drawings, in the prescribed manner and<br />
within the prescribed time limit, bef<strong>or</strong>e the international preliminary<br />
examination rep<strong>or</strong>t is established. <strong>The</strong> amendment shall not<br />
go beyond the disclosure in the international application as filed.<br />
*****<br />
(d) <strong>The</strong> applicant may respond to the written opinion.<br />
*****<br />
PCTRule66.<br />
Procedure bef<strong>or</strong>e the International Preliminary Examining<br />
Auth<strong>or</strong>ity<br />
*****<br />
66.3.Fonnal Response to the International Preliminary<br />
Examining Auth<strong>or</strong>ity<br />
(a) <strong>The</strong> applicant may respond to the invitation referred to in<br />
Rule 66.2(c) of the International Preliminary Examining Auth<strong>or</strong>ity<br />
by making amendments <strong>or</strong> - ifhe disagrees with the opinion of<br />
that Auth<strong>or</strong>ity -cby submitting arguments, as the case may be, <strong>or</strong><br />
do both.<br />
(b) Any response shall be submitted directly to the International<br />
Preliminary Examining Auth<strong>or</strong>ity.<br />
*****<br />
66.5.Amendment<br />
Any change, other than the rectification of obvious err<strong>or</strong>s, in<br />
the claims, the description, <strong>or</strong> the drawings, including cancellation<br />
of claims, omission of passages in the description, <strong>or</strong> omission of<br />
certain drawings;shall be considered an amendment.