08.08.2013 Views

The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral

The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral

The Subject Patent Already Has Underlining or ... - Bayhdolecentral

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1840 MANUAL OF PATENT EXAM1NlNG PROCEDURE<br />

(3) Conducting international and international-type<br />

searches and preparing international and international-type search<br />

rep<strong>or</strong>ts (PCT Art. 15, 17 and 18, and peT Rnles 25, 33 to 45 and<br />

47); and<br />

(4) Transmitting the international search rep<strong>or</strong>t tc the<br />

applicant and the International Bureau.<br />

<strong>The</strong> United States <strong>Patent</strong> and Trademark Office<br />

agreed to and was appointed by the PCTAssembly, to<br />

act as an International Searching Anth<strong>or</strong>ity. As such<br />

an auth<strong>or</strong>ity, a primary function is to establish documentary<br />

search rep<strong>or</strong>ts on pri<strong>or</strong> art with respect to<br />

inventions which are the subject ofapplications. See<br />

PCT Article 16.<br />

Pursuant to an agreement concluded with the International<br />

Bureau, the USPTO, as an International<br />

Searching Auth<strong>or</strong>ity, agreed to conduct international<br />

searches and prepare intemational search.rep<strong>or</strong>ts, f<strong>or</strong>,<br />

in addition to the United States of America, Barbados,<br />

Brazil, India, Israel, Mexico, New Zealand, South<br />

Africa, and Trinidad and Tobago. <strong>The</strong>agreementstipulated<br />

the English language and specified that the<br />

subject matter to be searched is that which is searched<br />

<strong>or</strong> examined in United States national applications.<br />

TRANSMITTAL OF THE SEARCH COpy TO<br />

THE INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING AU·<br />

THORITY<br />

<strong>The</strong> "search copy" is transmitted by the Receiving<br />

Office to the International Searching Auth<strong>or</strong>ity (PCT<br />

Article 12(1», the details of the transmittal are provided<br />

in PCT Rule 23.<br />

THE MAIN PROCEDURAL STEPS IN THE IN·<br />

TERNATIONAL SEARCHING AUTHORITY<br />

<strong>The</strong> main procedural steps that any international<br />

application goes through in the International Searching<br />

Auth<strong>or</strong>ity are (I) the making of the international<br />

search (PCT Article 15), and (2) the preparing of the<br />

international search rep<strong>or</strong>t (PCT Article 18 and PCT<br />

Rule 43).<br />

COMPETENT INTERNATIONAL SEARCHING<br />

AUTHORITY<br />

In respect of international applications filed with<br />

the U.S. Receiving Office, the United States International<br />

Searching Auth<strong>or</strong>ity, which is the Examining<br />

C<strong>or</strong>ps of the United States <strong>Patent</strong> and Trademark<br />

Office, and the European <strong>Patent</strong> Office are competent<br />

August 2001<br />

1800-44<br />

to carry out the international search (pCT Article 16,<br />

PCT Rules 35 and 36, 35 U.S.C. 362 and 37 CFR<br />

1.413).<br />

<strong>The</strong> United States <strong>Patent</strong> and Trademark Office has<br />

inf<strong>or</strong>med the International Bureau that in addition to<br />

the United States <strong>Patent</strong> and Trademark Office, the<br />

European <strong>Patent</strong> Office is competent as an International<br />

Searching Auth<strong>or</strong>ity f<strong>or</strong> searching all kinds of<br />

international applications filed in the United States<br />

Receiving Office on and after October I, 1982. (pCT<br />

Article 16(2) and PCT Rule 35.2(a)(i).<br />

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED WHEN<br />

CHOOSING AN INTERNATIONAL SEARCH­<br />

ING AUTHORITY<br />

Choosing <strong>The</strong> European <strong>Patent</strong> Office (EPO) as an<br />

International Searching Auth<strong>or</strong>ity could be advantageous<br />

to United States applicants who designate countries<br />

f<strong>or</strong> European Regional patent protection in PCT<br />

International applications f<strong>or</strong> the following reasons:<br />

(A) Claims may be amended acc<strong>or</strong>ding to EPO<br />

search results bef<strong>or</strong>e entering the European Office as<br />

a designated Office.<br />

(B) <strong>The</strong> EPO search fee need not be paid upon<br />

entering the European Office as a designated Office.<br />

(C) <strong>The</strong> EPO search results may be available f<strong>or</strong><br />

use in a U.S. pri<strong>or</strong>ity application.<br />

(D) <strong>The</strong> EPO international search may be<br />

obtained without the need f<strong>or</strong> a European professional<br />

representative.<br />

(E) <strong>The</strong> European <strong>Patent</strong> Office search could provide<br />

the U.S. applicant with the benefit of aEuropean<br />

art search (which may be different from applicant's<br />

own <strong>or</strong> the USPTO's search) bef<strong>or</strong>e it is necessary to<br />

enter the European <strong>Patent</strong> Office <strong>or</strong> other designated<br />

Offices.<br />

Some of the disadvantages that may occur due to<br />

the European <strong>Patent</strong> Office making the international<br />

search are the following:<br />

(A) Additional mailing time to and from the EPO<br />

Searching Auth<strong>or</strong>ity may sh<strong>or</strong>ten the time f<strong>or</strong> applicants<br />

to respond to various invitations from the EPO<br />

such as f<strong>or</strong> comments on abstracts and payments of<br />

additional search fees as well as f<strong>or</strong> PCT Article 19<br />

amendments to the claims after issuance of the International<br />

Search Rep<strong>or</strong>t.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!