08.08.2013 Views

PSYCHOTHERAPY ENGAGERS VERSUS NON-ENGAGERS

PSYCHOTHERAPY ENGAGERS VERSUS NON-ENGAGERS

PSYCHOTHERAPY ENGAGERS VERSUS NON-ENGAGERS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

treatment has begun (Gunzburger, Henggeler, & Watson, 1985). Other environmental<br />

factors such as lack of transportation and difficulty getting time off work or school (Beck<br />

et al., 1987; Cross & Warren, 1984) have surprisingly not had consistent relation to<br />

dropout (Barrett et al., 2008).<br />

Strategies for reducing psychotherapy dropout that were discussed in the Barrett<br />

et al. (2008) paper included: role induction (i.e. clarifying therapist and client roles),<br />

motivational interviewing, changing the treatment services model to better meet the<br />

changing demands of mental health treatment and managed care, therapist feedback, and<br />

strengthening the therapeutic relationship. Role induction (also referred to as pretherapy<br />

preparation) has been shown to improve client attendance (Walitzer, Dermen, & Connors,<br />

1999). 11 of the 16 studies reviewed by Walitzer et al. (1999) found that pretherapy<br />

training reduced rates of dropout. Techniques that clarify the therapist and client roles<br />

and give an overview of therapy have been found to improve attendance (Hoehn-Saric et<br />

al., 1964) and decrease dropout (Jacobs, Charles, Jacobs, Weinstein, & Mann, 1972).<br />

Brief motivational interviewing (brief MI; Rollnick & Heather, 1992), when<br />

integrated into the initial intake evaluation, has been related to nearly 50% reductions in<br />

dropout rates (Carroll, Libby, Sheehan, & Hyland, 2001), as discussed in the Barrett et al.<br />

(2008) paper. For example, Carroll et al. (2001) investigated the effects of brief MI<br />

intake evaluations on dropout. Dropouts for this study (Carroll et al., 2001) were<br />

individuals who did not begin treatment sessions after attending an initial intake<br />

evaluation. 60 individuals referred for a substance abuse evaluation by a child welfare<br />

worker were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: either a standard evaluation or<br />

an evaluation enhanced by brief MI techniques. The participants who received the brief<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!