PSYCHOTHERAPY ENGAGERS VERSUS NON-ENGAGERS
PSYCHOTHERAPY ENGAGERS VERSUS NON-ENGAGERS
PSYCHOTHERAPY ENGAGERS VERSUS NON-ENGAGERS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Estimated Likelihood (%)<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Information about the Process of Helping<br />
1st Third 2nd Third 3rd Third<br />
Thirds of Intake Session<br />
96<br />
Non-engager<br />
Engager<br />
Figure 8. Adjusted estimated mean percentages of information about the process of helping for engagers<br />
and non-engagers across thirds of the intake session. The Condition X Time interaction was significant,<br />
F(2, 3856) = 10.86, p < .001. Engager and non-engager groups did not significantly differ from each other<br />
(comparing vertically) within any of the thirds.<br />
Research Question 9: Do proportions of therapist information in the form of facts, data<br />
or opinions differ across time (1 st , 2 nd , and 3 rd thirds of intake sessions) and condition<br />
(engager versus non-engager)?<br />
For information in the form of facts, data or opinions, there was no statistically<br />
significant Condition X Time interaction, F(2, 3856) = 2.17, p = .115, and so we removed<br />
the interaction term from the model and tested the main effects models. Therapist use of<br />
information-facts/data/opinions did not differ between engagers and non-engagers in the<br />
intake sessions, F(1, 3861) = 1.36, p = .244. However, therapist use of information-<br />
facts/data/opinions did differ across thirds of the intake, F(2, 3858) = 25.57, p < .001.