View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository View/Open - University of Zululand Institutional Repository
that undermined the economic sustainability ofthe study area (D1adla, PeTS. Comm., Tuesday, 24-12-2007). Table 6.29 shows the level ofefficiency in terms offinancial management in the Ulundi Local Municipality. Generally, most respondents (58%) indicated that the study area faces poor financial management. Approximately (17%) felt that the level of efficiency offinancial Table 6.29: Financial management efficiency levels ofU1undi Local Municipality in 2007 Financial management Frequency , ! ! Percentage Cumulative percentage Poor 14.5 58 58 Average 4.2 17 75 Good 2 i !, 8 83 Very good .8 ! , 3 86 Excellent 3.2 i I 13 99 N/A .3 i I , 100 Total 25 I 100 I 100 management was satisfactory. Meanwhile about 13% respondents saw excellence in the way and manner finances were managed in the local municipality. Whilst about 8% accorded financial management a good rating, about 3% of interviewees concluded that the financial section ofthe local municipality was doing a very good job. According to Mayor, L.D. Buthelezi, (Pers. Comm., Tuesday 10-01-2006a), the rates and consumer debtors had continued to worsen in the Ulundi Municipality. In 2006, the rate of service debt excluding water was 60%. The failure by the community of Ulundi to meet its financial obligations to the municipality was having a negative financial effect to the extent that statutory reserves were being utilised to fund debtors, with the result that little or no funds were available for infrastructure expansion and or replacement. The lOP of Ulundi Local Municipality is therefore restricted to projects funded by way of grants. 188
- Page 156 and 157: 60 50 Gl 40 Cl S c: 30 Gl U.. Gl 20
- Page 159 and 160: Table 6.4: The relationship between
- Page 163 and 164: above children per household. The h
- Page 165 and 166: 6.4.1 Objective One: Existing lands
- Page 168: • Opathe Emakhosini Heritage Park
- Page 171 and 172: (e) White Umjolozi river andAloepla
- Page 173: (i) Accommodation andhospitalityfac
- Page 180 and 181: majority of the households appear t
- Page 182 and 183: interviewed (31 %) were within the
- Page 184 and 185: The community services division of
- Page 187: Table 6.19 describes the trend ofa
- Page 190 and 191: Table 6.21: The strategies for impr
- Page 192 and 193: attlefields and the broad coastal a
- Page 194: The ZDM (planning division) indicat
- Page 199: Table 6.24: Community projects in U
- Page 203: Interestingly, a significant 18% of
- Page 208 and 209: About 77% of respondents did not ha
- Page 210 and 211: sanitation master plan for environm
- Page 213: landscape and cultural attributes i
- Page 216: The study on the situational and la
- Page 219 and 220: effectively. Ulundi lacks the neede
- Page 222 and 223: The investigation has adapted this
- Page 224 and 225: development and goal attainment (Ro
- Page 226 and 227: Market options matrix Corporate man
- Page 228: processing. The Municipality may mi
- Page 231 and 232: problems of equity and democratic r
- Page 233 and 234: programmes in the rural areas. Part
- Page 235 and 236: ZDM (planning Unit) that the natura
- Page 237 and 238: Most household heads appear to have
- Page 239 and 240: Ulundi to Pietennaritzburg as the m
- Page 241 and 242: tourism potential are to be develop
- Page 243 and 244: concept embracing a balance between
- Page 245 and 246: also rated it as good and very good
- Page 247 and 248: The study further attempted to desc
- Page 249 and 250: 7.5 RECOMMENDATIONS This section of
- Page 251: This structured marketing campaign
- Page 254 and 255: The processed product has a huge in
that undermined the economic sustainability <strong>of</strong>the study area (D1adla, PeTS. Comm., Tuesday,<br />
24-12-2007).<br />
Table 6.29 shows the level <strong>of</strong>efficiency in terms <strong>of</strong>financial management in the Ulundi Local<br />
Municipality. Generally, most respondents (58%) indicated that the study area faces poor<br />
financial management. Approximately (17%) felt that the level <strong>of</strong> efficiency <strong>of</strong>financial<br />
Table 6.29: Financial management efficiency levels <strong>of</strong>U1undi Local Municipality in<br />
2007<br />
Financial<br />
management<br />
Frequency<br />
,<br />
!<br />
!<br />
Percentage<br />
Cumulative<br />
percentage<br />
Poor 14.5 58 58<br />
Average 4.2 17 75<br />
Good 2<br />
i<br />
!, 8 83<br />
Very good .8 ! , 3 86<br />
Excellent 3.2 i<br />
I 13 99<br />
N/A .3 i I , 100<br />
Total 25 I 100 I 100<br />
management was satisfactory. Meanwhile about 13% respondents saw excellence in the way<br />
and manner finances were managed in the local municipality. Whilst about 8% accorded<br />
financial management a good rating, about 3% <strong>of</strong> interviewees concluded that the financial<br />
section <strong>of</strong>the local municipality was doing a very good job.<br />
According to Mayor, L.D. Buthelezi, (Pers. Comm., Tuesday 10-01-2006a), the rates and<br />
consumer debtors had continued to worsen in the Ulundi Municipality. In 2006, the rate <strong>of</strong><br />
service debt excluding water was 60%. The failure by the community <strong>of</strong> Ulundi to meet its<br />
financial obligations to the municipality was having a negative financial effect to the extent<br />
that statutory reserves were being utilised to fund debtors, with the result that little or no<br />
funds were available for infrastructure expansion and or replacement. The lOP <strong>of</strong> Ulundi<br />
Local Municipality is therefore restricted to projects funded by way <strong>of</strong> grants.<br />
188