07.08.2013 Views

FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE PROBLEMS EFL ...

FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE PROBLEMS EFL ...

FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE PROBLEMS EFL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Successive ‘progress achievement tests’ were employed through out the course to<br />

see the students’ progress and to measure the students’ listening performance. At<br />

the end, these tests were recorded to determine students’ grade in the listening<br />

course.<br />

The tests were taken from “Listening to <strong>TO</strong><strong>EFL</strong>: Test Kit 2” (see pp 70). 90%<br />

of the semester score of the students were results of the total sum of these tests<br />

which were given on a continuous basis. In the continuous assessment of the<br />

course, for example, there were activities in which the students were made: to<br />

listen to a recorded interview (of native speakers) and then to carry out various<br />

tasks (such as, multiple choices, filling the blank, matching), to listen to a recorded<br />

‘real life’ conversation (of native speakers) and then to carryout various tasks, to<br />

listen to a recorded story of an incident and to answer comprehension questions,<br />

to listen to a recorded dialogue and to answer comprehension questions, etc,. The<br />

students’ results of the total sum of all the tests in the listening course were<br />

considered as the students’ listening achievement. The analysis of the scores<br />

helped to determine the students listening ability.<br />

The analysis was based on the scale given by Educational Testing Service<br />

of <strong>TO</strong><strong>EFL</strong> (http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/<strong>TO</strong><strong>EFL</strong>/pdf/Score). The scale has four levels<br />

of listening abilities: (1) Strong, (2) Average, (3) Minimal, and (3) Poor listening<br />

abilities. The scale is also expressed in numbers rated zero to six. Based on the<br />

scale, the extent of the examinees English listening ability was determined.<br />

According to the scale, for example, a score of 6 indicate strong listening abilities,<br />

5 indicate average listening abilities and 4 indicate minimal listening abilities. A<br />

score of 3, 2, or 1 also show lack of listening ability. This implies that a student who<br />

scored below half of the given scale can be labeled to be weak in listening ability.<br />

When we come to the particular intent of the analysis, the students’ results<br />

of the semester showed that 81% of the students scored below 50%, which<br />

indicated many of these students to be extremely weak in their listening<br />

performance (see Appendix F). This implies that the learners' listening ability is<br />

poor, and this poor listening ability also can be one factor which affected the<br />

learners <strong>EFL</strong> listening comprehension.<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!