07.08.2013 Views

FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE PROBLEMS EFL ...

FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE PROBLEMS EFL ...

FACTORS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THE PROBLEMS EFL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Item No.<br />

comprehension. Moreover, the result pointed out that a listening text without visual<br />

support or the speakers’ facial expressions and gestures interfere with learners’<br />

listening comprehension.<br />

4.1.1.3 Speaker factors<br />

Speaker factors can be a source of listening comprehension problems. Problems<br />

of listening comprehension related to speaker can be seen in relation to natural<br />

speech, pronunciation, and varied accents (Table-3).<br />

Factors related to speakers<br />

Item<br />

Statements<br />

No<br />

14 Speaker’s fast speech interfered with my listening comprehension.<br />

15 The speech of the native speakers with different speaking styles from what is<br />

familiar to me interfered with my listening comprehension.<br />

Table-3: Learners’ responses that refer to listening problems related to speech of<br />

the native speakers<br />

Students’ No.<br />

Never<br />

Students’ %<br />

Students’ No.<br />

Seldom Total<br />

positive<br />

Students’ %<br />

Students’ No.<br />

Students’ %<br />

LEVEL OF DIFFICULTY<br />

Sometimes Often Always Total<br />

negative<br />

Table-3 shows that almost all (91%) of the students have responded that<br />

fast speech often or always interfered with their listening comprehension. The<br />

great majority (76%) of the students have also responded that the different<br />

speaking styles of the native speakers often or always interfered with their listening<br />

comprehension. This is in line with the findings of previous research which indicate<br />

that hesitations and pauses in spontaneous speech cause perceptual problems<br />

and comprehension errors for non-native speakers (Voss, 1979).<br />

Students’ No.<br />

Students’ %<br />

14 2 1.34 1 0.67 3 2.01 11 7.38 29 19.46 106 71.14 146 97.98<br />

15 3 2.01 8 5.36 11 7.37 25 16.77 44 29.53 69 46.3 138 92.6<br />

From the result obtained, therefore, we can understand that the natural<br />

speech of the native speakers (which the students perceive as fast speech, and<br />

different speaking styles) interfere with the listening comprehension of many of our<br />

47<br />

Students’ No.<br />

Students’ %<br />

Students’ No.<br />

Students’ %<br />

Students’ No.<br />

Students’ %

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!