07.08.2013 Views

Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4408-4750. Myconet 13: 59

Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4408-4750. Myconet 13: 59

Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4408-4750. Myconet 13: 59

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VOLUME <strong>13</strong> DECEMBER 31, 2007<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Notes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>ascomycete</strong> <strong>systematics</strong><br />

<strong>Nos</strong>. <strong>4408</strong> - 4750<br />

H. Thorsten Lumbsch and Sabine M. Huhndorf (eds.)<br />

The Field Museum, Department of Botany, Chicago, USA<br />

Abstract<br />

Lumbsch, H. T. and S.M. Huhndorf (ed.) 2007. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Notes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>ascomycete</strong><br />

<strong>systematics</strong>. <strong>Nos</strong>. <strong>4408</strong> – <strong>4750.</strong> Myc<strong>on</strong>et <strong>13</strong>: <strong>59</strong> – 99.<br />

The present paper presents 342 notes <strong>on</strong> the tax<strong>on</strong>omy and<br />

nomenclature of <strong>ascomycete</strong>s (Ascomycota) at the generic and higher<br />

levels.<br />

Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />

The series ”<str<strong>on</strong>g>Notes</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>ascomycete</strong> <strong>systematics</strong>” has been published in Systema Ascomycetum<br />

(1986-1998) and in Myc<strong>on</strong>et since 1999 as hard copies and now at its new internet home at URL:<br />

http://www.fieldmuseum.org/myc<strong>on</strong>et/. The present paper presents 342 notes <strong>on</strong> the tax<strong>on</strong>omy and<br />

nomenclature of <strong>ascomycete</strong>s (Ascomycota) at the generic and higher levels. The date of electr<strong>on</strong>ic<br />

publicati<strong>on</strong> is given within parentheses at the end of each entry.<br />

4476. Acanthotrema A. Frisch<br />

This m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus was described by Frisch<br />

(2006) to accommodate Thelotrema brasilianum;<br />

see note under Thelotremataceae (4561). (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4477. Acarospora A. Massal.<br />

The genus is restricted by Crewe et al. (2006) to<br />

a m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic group of taxa related to the type<br />

species A. schleicheri. The A. smaragdula group<br />

and A. badiofusca are excluded from the genus<br />

in a strict sense. (2006-10-18)<br />

4478. Acarosporaceae Zahlbr.<br />

The delimitati<strong>on</strong> of genera in this family is<br />

studied by Crewe et al. (2006) who dem<strong>on</strong>strate<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Notes</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>59</strong><br />

that the genera Acarospora, Polysporinopsis, and<br />

Sarcogyne are not m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic in their current<br />

circumscripti<strong>on</strong>; see also notes under<br />

Acarospora (4477) and Polysporinopsis (4543).<br />

(2006-10-18)<br />

4568. Aciculopsora Aptroot & Trest<br />

This new genus is described for a single new<br />

lichenized species collected twice in lowland dry<br />

forests of NW Costa Rica (Aptroot et al. 2006).<br />

It is placed in Ramalinaceae based <strong>on</strong> ascus-type.<br />

Similar genera include Bacidiopsora Kalb and<br />

Squamacidia Brako. The latter is said to differ<br />

by thallus morphology and unexplained details<br />

of apothecia, while the former differs in<br />

morphology, apothecial pigmentati<strong>on</strong>, ascospore<br />

morphology and thallus chemistry. The genus<br />

will be accepted in the forthcoming outline in


Ramalinaceae, but additi<strong>on</strong>al studies – including<br />

molecular data – appear necessary to elucidate<br />

the placement of the genus. (2006-12-20)<br />

4569. Almbornia Essl.<br />

See note under Xanthoparmelia (4615). (2006-<br />

12-20)<br />

4479. Amphilogia Gryzenh. & M.J. Wingf.<br />

This genus was described in Gryzenhout et al.<br />

(2005) and will be placed in Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae<br />

following Gryzenhout et al. (2006); see note<br />

under Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae (4497). (2006-10-18)<br />

4480. Ampliotrema Kalb<br />

This genus was described by Kalb (2004), but<br />

the descripti<strong>on</strong> lacked a generic type. The name<br />

has been validated by Frisch (2006). However,<br />

Frisch (2006) discussed the similarities to<br />

Ocellularia and Frisch et al. (2006) showed that<br />

Ampliotrema is nested within a str<strong>on</strong>gly<br />

supported Ocellularia s.str. C<strong>on</strong>sequently,<br />

Ampliotrema will be regarded a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of<br />

Ocellularia in the next outline; see also note<br />

under Thelotremataceae (4561). (2006-10-18)<br />

<strong>4408</strong>. Annulatascaceae S.W. W<strong>on</strong>g, K.D. Hyde<br />

& E.B.G. J<strong>on</strong>es<br />

In a phylogenetic study using partial LSU rDNA<br />

sequences (Vijaykrishna et al. 2005) the family<br />

fell into two distinct clades, <strong>on</strong>e was sister to<br />

Ophiostomatales and another clade basal to these<br />

two groups. (2006-05-30)<br />

4409. Annulohypoxyl<strong>on</strong> Y.-M. Ju, J.D. Rogers<br />

& H.-M. Hsieh<br />

Hypoxyl<strong>on</strong> sect. Annulata was raised to generic<br />

level by Hsieh et al. (2005); see note under<br />

Hypoxyl<strong>on</strong>. (2006-05-30)<br />

4410. Anziaceae M. Sato<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> deviating ascospores this family is<br />

often kept separate from Parmeliaceae (e.g.,<br />

Kärnefelt & Thell 1992). However, it agrees<br />

with the latter family in ascomatal anatomy and<br />

molecular studies (Mattss<strong>on</strong> & Wedin 1999,<br />

60<br />

Thell et al. 2004) supported its inclusi<strong>on</strong> in<br />

Parmeliaceae. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, Anzia will be<br />

included in Parmeliaceae in the next outline.<br />

(2006-05-30)<br />

4450. Apodus Malloch & Cain<br />

See note under Sordariaceae (4469). (2006-07-<br />

17)<br />

4481. Apogaeumannomyces Matsush.<br />

This genus was described by Matsushima (2003)<br />

for a species isolated from palm fr<strong>on</strong>ds and<br />

forming the teleomorph and a Cercosporula<br />

anamorph in culture. It is placed in the<br />

Sordariomycetidae inc. sed. until its affinities<br />

can be established. (2006-10-18)<br />

4616. Aporothielavia Malloch & Cain<br />

Greif and Currah (2007) studied the ascoma<br />

development in this m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus and<br />

showed that A. leptoderma bel<strong>on</strong>gs in<br />

Chaetomidium. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, Aporothielavia is<br />

placed into syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with that genus. (2007-06-<br />

05)<br />

4617. Aptrootia Lücking & Sipman<br />

Lücking et al. (2007) described this new genus in<br />

Trypetheliaceae for an aberrant species in that<br />

family. It was previously believed to bel<strong>on</strong>g to<br />

Thelenellaceae, but del Prado et al. (2006)<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strated it bel<strong>on</strong>gs to Dothideomycetes. It<br />

should be noted that the generic c<strong>on</strong>cept in this<br />

family requires revisi<strong>on</strong>. (2007-06-05)<br />

4618. Arachnomycetales Gibas, Sigler &<br />

Currah<br />

Geiser et al. (2007) included this order in<br />

Onygenales. (2007-06-05)<br />

4570. Arthroascus Arx<br />

Naumov et al. (2006) described two new taxa in<br />

this yeast genus using molecular data to support<br />

their decisi<strong>on</strong>. The genus was previously<br />

included in Saccharomycopsis in the outline, but<br />

previously Naumov et al. (2003) provided<br />

evidence from a phylogenetic analysis inferred


from nu LSU rDNA sequences that Arthroascus<br />

is a distinct lineage. Hence the genus will be<br />

accepted within Saccharomycopsidaceae in the<br />

next outline. (2006-12-20)<br />

4619. Arthrorhaphidaceae Poelt & Hafellner<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) showed that this<br />

family needs to be placed in Ostropomycetidae<br />

inc. sed. (2007-06-05)<br />

4620. Arxiozyma Van der Walt & Yarrow<br />

Kurtzman & Robnett (2007) showed that the<br />

genus is syn<strong>on</strong>ymous with Kazachstania. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4482. Ascocor<strong>on</strong>ospora Matsush.<br />

This genus was described by Matsushima (2003)<br />

for a species isolated from decaying litter and<br />

forming the teleomorph and a Cor<strong>on</strong>ospora<br />

anamorph in culture. It is placed in the<br />

Dothideomycetidae inc. sed. until its affinities<br />

can be established. (2006-10-18)<br />

4483. Ascofascicula Matsush.<br />

This genus was described by Matsushima (2003)<br />

for a species isolated from soil and forming the<br />

teleomorph in culture with ascospores that have a<br />

spiral-like ornamentati<strong>on</strong>. The hymenium<br />

appeared to form without an enclosing structure.<br />

It is placed in the Ascomycota inc. sed. until its<br />

affinities can be established. (2006-10-18)<br />

4411. Ascomycota<br />

Lopandic et al. (2005) used a SSU rDNA<br />

phylogeny framework to discuss chemical<br />

differences in major clades of Ascomycota. Cell<br />

wall carbohydrates and ubiquin<strong>on</strong>e comp<strong>on</strong>ents<br />

were analyzed within numerous Ascomycota.<br />

Saccharomycotina were found to have a glucosemannose<br />

pattern differing from that of<br />

Pezizomycotina, while basal Ascomycota<br />

showed a glucose-mannose-galactose-rhamnose-<br />

(fucose) profile. Differences in the ubiquin<strong>on</strong>e<br />

patterns were also found. This underlines the<br />

phylogenetic importance of chemotax<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

characters to circumscribe major lineages in<br />

fungi. The authors interpret their<br />

chemotax<strong>on</strong>omic results, however, as<br />

61<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tradictive to molecular phylogenies in placing<br />

Saccharomycotina at the base of Ascomycota.<br />

(2006-05-30)<br />

4621. Ascosphaerales Gäum. ex Skou<br />

Geiser et al. (2007) included this order in<br />

Onygenales. (2007-06-05)<br />

4412. Ascoyunnania L. Cai & K.D. Hyde<br />

This new genus was described for a new species<br />

collected from submerged bamboo in China (Cai<br />

et al. 2005). A single collecti<strong>on</strong> is known and<br />

hence no molecular data are available for a<br />

placement of this enigmatic fungus that has<br />

deeply immersed, ostiolate ascomata, hyaline<br />

guttulate ascospores that germinate to form dark<br />

brown to black, globose, tuberculate sec<strong>on</strong>dary<br />

spores. The genus will be placed in<br />

Sordariomycetes incertae sedis. (2006-05-30)<br />

4571. Aspicilia A. Massal.<br />

See note under Megasporaceae (4<strong>59</strong>1). (2006-<br />

12-20)<br />

4572. Ayria Fryar & K.D. Hyde<br />

This new genus is described for a single species<br />

collected <strong>on</strong> submerged rotting wood that is most<br />

similar to Pseudoproboscispora Punith., but<br />

differs in having asci lacking an apical ring and<br />

n<strong>on</strong>-septate, biseriate ascospores (Fryar & Hyde<br />

2004). It will be accepted in the next outline in<br />

Annulatascaceae. (2006-12-20)<br />

4622. Babjevia van der Walt & M.Th. Smith<br />

See note 4643. (2007-06-05)<br />

44<strong>13</strong>. Baeomycetaceae Dumort.<br />

This family is currently placed incertae sedis, but<br />

molecular studies (e.g., Lutz<strong>on</strong>i et al. 2004,<br />

Wedin et al. 2005) supported its placement in<br />

Ostropomycetidae. Its exact placement is<br />

uncertain and it will be placed in<br />

Ostropomycetidae incertae sedis. (2006-05-30)<br />

4623. Baeomycetaceae Dumort.


In the study of Miadlikowska et al. (2007) this<br />

family clustered in Ostropomycetidae and it will<br />

be placed in this suborder inc. sed. in the next<br />

outline. (2007-06-05)<br />

4484. Basidioascus Matsush.<br />

This genus was described as an <strong>ascomycete</strong> by<br />

Matsushima (2003) for a species isolated from<br />

soil. The photographs in the publicati<strong>on</strong> clearly<br />

show hyphae with clamp c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>s and<br />

developing basidia with up to four basidiospores<br />

forming <strong>on</strong> el<strong>on</strong>gate sterigmata. It is therefore<br />

excluded from Ascomycota and placed in<br />

Basidiomycota inc. sed. until its affinities can be<br />

established. (2006-10-18)<br />

4624. Boreoplaca Timdal<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) provided evidence<br />

that this genus should be transferred from<br />

Lecanoromycetes inc. sed. to Lecanoromycetidae<br />

inc. sed., supporting earlier studies by Wedin et<br />

al. (2005). (2007-06-05)<br />

4485. Botryosphaeriaceae Theiss. & H. Syd.<br />

The major clades in Botryosphaeriaceae are<br />

resolved by Crous et al. (2006) using nu LSU<br />

rDNA sequence data. 12 clades are recognized<br />

with two of them falling outside the family.<br />

Within the family ten lineages are accepted. The<br />

clades are characterized by distinct types of<br />

anamorphs. No new teleomorph generic name<br />

was proposed. (2006-10-18)<br />

4625. Botryosphaeriaceae Theiss. & H. Syd.<br />

See note 4626 under Botryosphaeriales. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4626. Botryosphaeriales Schoch, Crous &<br />

Shoemaker<br />

This new order in Dothideomycetes is described<br />

by Schoch et al. (2007) to accommodate<br />

Botryosphaeriaceae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4627. Bryoglossum Redhead<br />

62<br />

Wang et al. (2007) suggested transferring this<br />

genus from Geoglossaceae to Hyaloscyphaceae.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4414. Bryogomphus Lücking, W.R. Buck,<br />

Sérus. & L.I. Ferraro<br />

The recently described species Gomphillus<br />

caribaeus (Buck 1998) was shown to differ from<br />

Gomphillus s.str. in having lecanoroid,<br />

Sporopodium-type asci and a<br />

prosoplectenchymatous exciple (Lücking et al.<br />

2005). The new genus is placed in Pilocarpaceae<br />

(Lecanorales). (2006-05-30)<br />

4415. Bulbotrichella V. Marcano, S. Mohali &<br />

A. Morales<br />

This genus is currently accepted in Parmeliaceae,<br />

but Lumbsch (1997) showed that its distincti<strong>on</strong><br />

was based <strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>idiomata that in fact bel<strong>on</strong>g to a<br />

lichenicolous fungus. Hence, the genus is treated<br />

as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of Bulbothrix in the next outline.<br />

(2006-05-30)<br />

4628. Caliciaceae Chevall.<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) supported previous<br />

results that this family is nested within<br />

Physciaceae (Helms et al. 2003, Wedin et al.<br />

2003). Hence in the next outline Caliciaceae will<br />

be treated as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of Physciaceae. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4416. Candelariaceae Hakul.<br />

Currently this family is included in<br />

Lecanoraceae, but phylogenetic analyses showed<br />

that it has a basal positi<strong>on</strong> in Lecanoromycetes<br />

and is not closely related to Lecanoraceae (e.g.,<br />

Wedin et al. 2005). Thus it will be accepted as an<br />

independent family in the next outline. (2006-05-<br />

30)<br />

4629. Candelariaceae Hakul.<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) supported the<br />

independence of Candelariaceae from<br />

Lecanoraceae and found this family to cluster as<br />

sister to Lecanoromycetidae+Ostropomycetidae.<br />

They indicate that the descripti<strong>on</strong> of an order to<br />

accommodate this family will be necessary.<br />

(2007-06-05)


4630. Capnodiales Wor<strong>on</strong>.<br />

This order is placed in Dothideomycetidae by<br />

Schoch et al. (2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4486. Carassea S. Stenroos<br />

Stenroos et al. (2002) showed in a phylogenetic<br />

analysis based <strong>on</strong> nu SSU rDNA sequences that<br />

Clad<strong>on</strong>ia is not m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic. C. c<strong>on</strong>nexa is<br />

shown to be closer to Metus and Pilophorus and<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sequently segregated as a new genus<br />

Carassea. The m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus occurs in South<br />

America, its primary thallus is unknown and it<br />

differs morphologically from Clad<strong>on</strong>ia in having<br />

highly anastomosing thallus branches. It will be<br />

accepted in Clad<strong>on</strong>iaceae in the next outline.<br />

(2006-10-18)<br />

4631. Catillochroma Kalb<br />

The genus is described by Kalb (2007) for a<br />

number of crustose, predominantly tropical<br />

species that have a layered exciple with a<br />

prosoplectenchymatous outer part and an inner<br />

part, which is composed of a textura intricata<br />

with large intercellular spaces. It is placed in<br />

Megalariaceae and will be accepted in the<br />

forthcoming outline. (2007-06-05)<br />

4487. Celoporthe Nakab., Gryzenh, Jol. Roux<br />

& M.J. Wingf.<br />

The genus was described by Nakab<strong>on</strong>ge et al.<br />

(2006) for a pathogenic fungus <strong>on</strong> Myrtales in<br />

South Africa. The genus resembles<br />

Chrysoporthe, but is not closely related in a<br />

phylogenetic analysis and differs in<br />

morphological characters, such as short<br />

perithecial necks, cylindrical to ovoid c<strong>on</strong>idia,<br />

and pseudoparenchymatous stromatic tissue at<br />

the c<strong>on</strong>idiomatal base. It will be accepted in<br />

Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae in the next outline. (2006-10-<br />

18)<br />

4573. Cepsiclava J. Walker<br />

Walker (2004) described this new genus in<br />

Clavicipitaceae for an endophyte occurring in<br />

southeastern Australia. It is unique in the family<br />

in invading stamens before ovaries. (2006-12-20)<br />

63<br />

4488. Ceratocystiopsis H.P. Upadhyay & W.B.<br />

Kendr.<br />

This genus is resurrected by Zipfel et al. (2006);<br />

see note under Ophiostoma (4537). (2006-10-18)<br />

4489. Ceratostomella Sacc.<br />

Réblová (2006) emended the generic c<strong>on</strong>cept of<br />

Ceratostomella, accepting four species and using<br />

multigene data found that its affinities are within<br />

the Sordariomycetidae in a large unsupported<br />

clade that includes members of the<br />

Ophiostomatales and the Annulatascaceae. It will<br />

be included in the Sordariomycetidae inc. sed.<br />

(2006-10-18)<br />

4574. Cetrad<strong>on</strong>ia J.-C. Wei & Ahti<br />

Zhou et al. (2006) dem<strong>on</strong>strated that this<br />

m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus bel<strong>on</strong>gs to Clad<strong>on</strong>iaceae where<br />

it was sister to Gymnoderma, the genus in which<br />

the single species was formerly placed. The<br />

status of this genus needs to be re-assessed with<br />

special emphasis <strong>on</strong> the distincti<strong>on</strong> to<br />

Gymnoderma. (2006-12-20)<br />

4575. Cetrad<strong>on</strong>iaceae J.-C. Wei & Ahti<br />

The family was shown to be nested within<br />

Clad<strong>on</strong>iaceae in a phylogenetic study by Zhou et<br />

al. (2006). C<strong>on</strong>sequently, it will be reduced to<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with the latter family in the next<br />

outline.<br />

4490. Chaetosphaeria Tul. & C. Tul.<br />

Huhndorf and Fernández (2005) using data from<br />

ITS, expanded the c<strong>on</strong>cept of Chaetosphaeria to<br />

include additi<strong>on</strong>al scolecosporous species with<br />

distinct globose, outer ascomatal wall cells. This<br />

characteristic was used by Matsushima (2003) to<br />

describe a new genus (see note 4538). Fernández<br />

et al. (2006) upheld the m<strong>on</strong>ophyly of<br />

Chaetosphaeria and the separati<strong>on</strong> of Zignoella<br />

and Melanopsammella from Chaetosphaeria in<br />

analyses using data from LSU and beta tubulin<br />

genes. (2006-10-18)<br />

4491. Chaetosphaerides Matsush.<br />

This genus was described by Matsushima (2003)<br />

for a species isolated from plant material and


forming the teleomorph and a Ramichloridium<br />

anamorph in culture. It is placed in the<br />

Sordariomycetidae inc. sed. until its affinities<br />

can be established. (2006-10-18)<br />

4492. Chapsa A. Massal.<br />

This genus was resurrected by Frisch (2006); see<br />

note under Thelotremataceae (4561). (2006-10-<br />

18)<br />

4632. Chlorencoelia J.R. Dix<strong>on</strong><br />

Wang et al. (2007) suggested transferring this<br />

genus from Helotiaceae to Hemiphacidiaceae.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4417. Ch<strong>on</strong>dropsis Nyl.<br />

This genus is currently accepted in Parmeliaceae,<br />

but since morphological and molecular data have<br />

shown it to be part of Xanthoparmelia<br />

(Hawksworth & Crespo 2002, Blanco et al.<br />

2004), it will be treated as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of the<br />

latter in the next outline. (2006-05-30)<br />

4493. Chroodiscus (Müll. Arg.) Müll. Arg.<br />

The genus is used in a restricted sense by Frisch<br />

(2006); see note under Thelotremataceae (4561).<br />

(2006-10-18)<br />

4494. Chrysoporthe Gryzenh. & M.J. Wingf.<br />

This genus, currently classified as Diaporthales<br />

inc. sed., will be placed in Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae<br />

following Gryzenhout et al. (2006); see note<br />

under Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae (4497). (2006-10-18)<br />

4576. Clad<strong>on</strong>iaceae Zenker<br />

See note under Cetrad<strong>on</strong>iaceae (4575). (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

4451. Clathroporina Müll. Arg.<br />

See note under Porinaceae (4465). (2006-07-17)<br />

4577. Coccotremataceae Henssen ex J.C.<br />

David & D. Hawksw.<br />

64<br />

In a phylogenetic study employing nu LSU and<br />

mt SSU rDNA sequence data, Schmitt et al.<br />

(2006) showed that Coccotremataceae are<br />

closely related to Pertusariaceae s.str. Although<br />

this relati<strong>on</strong>ship is not str<strong>on</strong>gly supported,<br />

Pertusariales is str<strong>on</strong>gly supported and hence the<br />

family will be placed in Pertusariales in the next<br />

issue of the outline. (2006-12-20)<br />

4418. Coenog<strong>on</strong>iaceae (Fr.) Stizenb.<br />

Kauff & Büdel (2005) presented morphological<br />

evidence that supports the distincti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Coenog<strong>on</strong>iaceae from Gyalectaceae proposed by<br />

Kauff & Lutz<strong>on</strong>i (2002) based <strong>on</strong> molecular<br />

data. They showed that members of<br />

Coenog<strong>on</strong>iaceae differ in ascomatal <strong>on</strong>togeny<br />

and anatomy, ascospore size and septati<strong>on</strong>, and<br />

thallus and pycnidial anatomy. (2006-05-30)<br />

4495. Cornipulvina Huhndorf, A.N. Mill.,<br />

F.A. Fernández & Lodge<br />

This genus was described for a single species<br />

with l<strong>on</strong>g-necked stromata and ellipsoid<br />

ascospores (Huhndorf et al. 2005). LSU<br />

sequence data places it in the Boliniaceae where<br />

it will be listed in the next outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4633. Coryneliales Seaver & Chard<strong>on</strong><br />

Geiser et al. (2007) and Spatafora et al. (2007)<br />

showed that this order bel<strong>on</strong>g to<br />

Eurotiomycetidae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4634. Crivellia Shoemaker & Inderbitzin<br />

The genus is described in Inderbitzin et al.<br />

(2006) for a species previously included in<br />

Pleospora, but differing in ascospore- and<br />

anamorph-morphology. Molecular analyses<br />

show that it bel<strong>on</strong>gs to the Alternaria group and<br />

not in Pleospora. Hence, the genus will be<br />

accepted in the forthcoming outline. (2007-06-<br />

05)<br />

4496. Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectria (Sacc.) Sacc. & D. Sacc.<br />

This genus, currently classified as Diaporthales<br />

inc. sed., will be placed in Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae<br />

following Gryzenhout et al. (2006); see note<br />

under Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae (4496). Gryzenhout et<br />

al. (2005a) proposed the c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> of the


genus name with a c<strong>on</strong>served type, C. parasitica,<br />

against C. gyrosa. (2006-10-18)<br />

4497. Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae Gryzenh. & M.J.<br />

Wingf.<br />

Gryzenhout et al. (2006) described this family to<br />

accommodate genera that cluster in the<br />

Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectria-Endothia complex and that are<br />

distinguished from other groups in the<br />

Diaporthales by pigmentati<strong>on</strong> or distinctive color<br />

pigment reacti<strong>on</strong>s. Additi<strong>on</strong>al genera that cluster<br />

in this well supported familial clade are<br />

Amphilogia, Chrysoporthe and Rostraureum. All<br />

five genera form distinct and well supported<br />

clades. (2006-10-18)<br />

4498. Cucurbitariaceae G. Winter<br />

Kruys et al. (2006) dem<strong>on</strong>strated that the family<br />

that is currently listed am<strong>on</strong>g families with<br />

uncertain positi<strong>on</strong> in<br />

Dothideomycetes/Chaetothyriomycetes bel<strong>on</strong>gs<br />

to Pleosporales where it will be listed in the next<br />

outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4635. Cucurbitariaceae G. Winter<br />

This family will be placed in Pleosporales in the<br />

forthcoming outline, following the study by<br />

Schoch et al. (2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4578. Cuspidatispora A. Mill., Shearer,<br />

Bartolata & Huhndorf<br />

Miller et al. (2006) described a new genus and<br />

species in Sordariales based <strong>on</strong> data from beta<br />

tubulin and LSU genes. It has apiosporous<br />

ascospores with a pr<strong>on</strong>ounced apical wall<br />

extensi<strong>on</strong> and villose ascomata with a central<br />

melanized wall layer and an areolate outer wall<br />

layer. While apiosporous ascospores are<br />

routinely found within the order, the apical wall<br />

extensi<strong>on</strong> is a unique character in the group. The<br />

family designati<strong>on</strong> of Cuspidatispora is<br />

unresolved and thus it is placed in Sordariales<br />

inc. sed. (2006-12-20)<br />

4579. Cyttariales Luttr. ex Gamundi<br />

See note under Leotiomycetes (4586). (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

65<br />

4419. Dasyscyphus Nees<br />

The genus is shown to be a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of<br />

Lachnum (Hyaloscyphaceae) by Suková (2005).<br />

For the later hom<strong>on</strong>ym Dasyscyphus Fuckel,<br />

nom. illeg. the new name Neodasyscypha<br />

Suková & Spo<strong>on</strong>er is proposed; see note under<br />

that name. (2006-05-30)<br />

4636. Davidgallowia Aptroot<br />

Aptroot (2007) described this new lichen genus<br />

for a single collecti<strong>on</strong> from Papua New Guinea.<br />

The genus is placed in Parmeliaceae and said to<br />

differ from the morphologically similar genera<br />

Cavernularia and Hypogymnia by the absence of<br />

atranorin in the cortex and bicornute ascospores.<br />

It differs from Menegazzia in having a smooth<br />

upper surface and also bicornute ascospores. No<br />

molecular data were presented. Since bicornute<br />

ascospores are not regarded as a generic<br />

character in other genera in Parmeliaceae (e.g.<br />

Bulbothrix c<strong>on</strong>tains species with ellipsoidal and<br />

bicornute ascospores; Divakar & Upreti 2004,<br />

Elix 1994), the status of this genus requires<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>al studies. It will be accepted in<br />

Parmeliaceae for the time being. (2007-06-05)<br />

4637. Davidiellaceae Schoch, Spatafora, Crous<br />

& Shoemaker<br />

This new family in Capnodiales is described for<br />

Davidiella species with their Cladosporium<br />

anamorphs (Schoch et al. 2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4638. Dekkera van der Walt<br />

See note 4710 under Pichiaceae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4499. Delitschiaceae M.E. Barr<br />

The distincti<strong>on</strong> of this family from<br />

Sporormiaceae is supported by Kruys et al.<br />

(2006). (2006-10-18)<br />

4500. Diademaceae Shoemaker & C.E. Babc.<br />

Kruys et al. (2006) dem<strong>on</strong>strated that the family<br />

that is currently listed am<strong>on</strong>g families with<br />

uncertain positi<strong>on</strong> in<br />

Dothideomycetes/Chaetothyriomycetes bel<strong>on</strong>gs


to Pleosporales where it will be listed in the next<br />

outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4639. Diatrypaceae Nitschke<br />

A phylogenetic study based <strong>on</strong> morphological<br />

characters of the family is presented by Caraman<br />

et al. (2006) who propose to resurrect<br />

Per<strong>on</strong>eutypa (see under note 4701). (2007-06-<br />

05)<br />

4640. Dictyographa Müll. Arg.<br />

This genus is reduced to syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with<br />

Opegrapha by Ertz and Diederich (2007). These<br />

authors c<strong>on</strong>firm previous studies (Matzer 1996)<br />

showing that the two genera agree in most<br />

ascomatal characters, with the sole excepti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

spore septati<strong>on</strong>. While Opegrapha has<br />

transversally septate ascospores, the spores in<br />

Dictyographa are muriform. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, the<br />

two genera are merged, which will be followed<br />

in the next outline. (2007-06-05)<br />

4641. Didymella Sacc. ex D. Sacc.<br />

This genus clustered in Pleosporales in the<br />

analyses by Schoch et al. (2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4501. Didymosphaeriaceae Munk<br />

Kruys et al. (2006) showed that the family that is<br />

currently listed am<strong>on</strong>g families with uncertain<br />

positi<strong>on</strong> in<br />

Dothideomycetes/Chaetothyriomycetes bel<strong>on</strong>gs<br />

to Pleosporales where it will be listed in the next<br />

outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4642. Diomedella Hertel<br />

Diomedella was reduced to syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with<br />

Lecanora by Rambold (1989), which will be<br />

followed in the forthcoming outline. (2007-06-<br />

05)<br />

4452. Diplogelasinospora Cain<br />

See note under Sordariaceae (4469). (2006-07-<br />

17)<br />

4643. Dipodascopsis L.R. Batra & Millner<br />

66<br />

Kurtzman et al. (2007) emendated the diagnosis<br />

of this genus to include Babjevia. (2007-06-05)<br />

4453. Dolichousnea (Y. Ohmura) Articus<br />

This genus will be treated as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of<br />

Usnea in the next outline; see note under Usnea<br />

(4473). (2006-07-17)<br />

4644. Dothideomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka<br />

Schoch et al. (2007) presented a new<br />

phylogenetic analysis using a multigene data set<br />

from 96 taxa and discussed the evoluti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

characters in this class. Numerous changes are<br />

necessary as the result of this study; these are<br />

listed under the subclass, order, family and<br />

generic names. (2007-06-05)<br />

4645. Dothideomycetidae P.M. Kirk, P.F.<br />

Cann<strong>on</strong>, J.C, David & J.A. Stalpers ex<br />

Schoch, Spatafora, Crous & Shoemaker<br />

The new subclass in Dothideomycetes (Schoch<br />

et al. 2007) is described for the aparaphysate<br />

Dothideomycetes and includes the orders<br />

Capnodiales, Dothideales, and Myriangiales.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4502. Endothia Fr.<br />

This genus, currently classified as Diaporthales<br />

inc. sed., will be placed in Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae<br />

following Gryzenhout et al. (2006); see note<br />

under Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae (4497). (2006-10-18)<br />

4420. Enterographa Fée<br />

The genus is revised by Sparrius (2004). He<br />

accepted 35 species, mainly distributed in the<br />

tropics. (2006-05-30)<br />

4503. Eremodothis Arx<br />

Kruys et al. (2006) showed that this genus<br />

bel<strong>on</strong>gs to Sporormiaceae and not<br />

Testudinaceae. Hence it will be placed in the<br />

former in the next outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4580. Erysiphales Gwynne-Vaughan


See note under Leotiomycetes (4586). (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

4504. Erythromada Huhndorf, A.N. Mill.,<br />

F.A. Fernández & Lodge<br />

This genus was described for a single species<br />

with superficial, clustered ascomata and<br />

scolecosporous ascospores (Huhndorf et al.<br />

2005). LSU sequence data places it near<br />

Rimac<strong>on</strong>us am<strong>on</strong>g a group of unresolved taxa in<br />

the Sordariomycetidae. It will be listed in the<br />

Sordariomycetidae inc. sed. in the next outline.<br />

(2006-10-18)<br />

4646. Etheirophora Kohlm. & Volkm.-Kohlm.<br />

See note 4662 under Hypocreomycetidae. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4454. Eumitria Stirt.<br />

This genus will be treated as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of<br />

Usnea in the next outline; see note under Usnea<br />

(4473). (2006-07-17)<br />

4647. Eurotiomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka<br />

Geiser et al. (2007) used a multigene data set to<br />

infer the phylogeny of this class and provided an<br />

overview of the incredible morphological<br />

diversity in this clade. They c<strong>on</strong>firmed the<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ophyly of the class with two subclasses, i.e.<br />

Chaetothyriomycetidae and Eurotiomycetidae.<br />

The former includes the orders Chaetothyriales,<br />

Pyrenulales, and Verrucariales, while<br />

Eurotiomycetidae includes Coryneliales,<br />

Eurotiales, and Onygenales (including<br />

Arachnomyctales and Ascosphaerales). The<br />

placement of Mycocaliciales in the class is not<br />

str<strong>on</strong>gly supported. (2007-06-05)<br />

4505. Fibrillithecis A. Frisch<br />

This genus was described by Frisch (2006); see<br />

note under Thelotremataceae (4561). (2006-10-<br />

18)<br />

4506. Fremitomyces P.F. Cann<strong>on</strong> & H.C.<br />

Evans<br />

67<br />

This new genus was introduced by Cann<strong>on</strong> &<br />

Evans (1999) for two species from East Africa<br />

and the Seychelles occurring <strong>on</strong> Erythroxylaceae<br />

with initially brightly colored stromata. The<br />

genus will be listed in Phyllachoraceae. (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4455. Frigidopyrenia Grube<br />

Grube (2005) described this new genus to<br />

accommodate an arctic lichen that was<br />

previously placed in Collemopsidium or<br />

Pyrenocollema. It, however, differs from these<br />

genera by producing relatively large ascomata<br />

with thick-walled, pigmented hyphae c<strong>on</strong>necting<br />

the ascomatal base with the lichen thallus,<br />

different peridial cells and more cylindrical asci.<br />

(2006-07-17)<br />

4581. Funiliomyces Aptroot<br />

This new genus was described by Aptroot<br />

(2004). In a phylogenetic analysis of ITS rDNA<br />

sequences, the new genus was sister to a clade<br />

including Arecophila K.D. Hyde and a Rosellinia<br />

spp. The genus will be accepted in<br />

Amphisphaeriaceae in the next outline. (2006-<br />

12-20)<br />

4421. Fusoidispora D. Vijaykrishna, R.<br />

Jeew<strong>on</strong> & K.D. Hyde<br />

This new genus was described by Vijaykrishna<br />

et al. (2005) to accommodate a freshwater<br />

fungus with fusoid ascospores with mucilaginous<br />

pads at both apices and l<strong>on</strong>g cylindrical asci with<br />

refractive apical rings. The genus is placed in<br />

Annulatascaceae, which was found to be<br />

polyphyletic (see under Annulatascaceae).<br />

(2006-05-30)<br />

4648. Gallaicolichen Serux. & Lücking<br />

This new genus is introduced for a sterile<br />

foliicolous lichen that cannot be placed<br />

elsewhere (Serusiaux & Lücking 2007). In the<br />

absence of any ascomata or molecular data, the<br />

genus will be placed incertae sedis in the next<br />

outline. (2007-06-05)<br />

4507. Gelasinospora Dowding


In a molecular study using partial LSU, Garcia et<br />

al (2004; see also Note #4194) determined that<br />

Gelasinospora could not be maintained as<br />

separate from Neurospora and was placed into<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ymy under the earlier genus. In that study<br />

species of Sordaria were not included. With<br />

multiple gene analyses the picture changes. Cai<br />

et al. (2006) in a phylogenetic study using partial<br />

LSU, ITS, and partial beta-tubulin, presented<br />

evidence that is suggestive of a complex<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ship between species of Sordaria,<br />

Gelasinospora and Neurospora with species of<br />

Gelasinospora and Neurospora not forming a<br />

single m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic clade separate from species<br />

of Sordaria. As Gelasinospora and Neurospora<br />

appear to be closely related but do not resolve as<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic groups, Gelasinospora cannot be<br />

maintained as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of Neurospora and will<br />

again be accepted as a separate genus in the<br />

Sordariaceae. (2006-10-18)<br />

4649. Gemmaspora D. Hawksw. & Halici<br />

The new genus Gemmaspora is described for a<br />

lichenicolous fungus occurring <strong>on</strong> Aspicilia<br />

species. It is referred to Verrucariales based <strong>on</strong><br />

ascoma and ascus structure (Hawksworth &<br />

Halici 2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4582. Geoglossaceae Corda<br />

Geoglossaceae together with Sarcoleotia formed<br />

a str<strong>on</strong>gly supported clade outside<br />

Leotiomycetes in an analysis by Wang et al.<br />

(2006). The authors proposed ad interim a<br />

separate class Geoglossomycetes to<br />

accommodate these fungi. This clade of<br />

helotialean terrestrial fungi is characterized by<br />

paraphyses with dark pigments and dark<br />

ascospores. The family will be removed from<br />

Leotiomycetes and placed incertae sedis in the<br />

next outline. It remains to be seen in a study<br />

including a wider tax<strong>on</strong> sampling of other<br />

classes whether the group needs recogniti<strong>on</strong> as a<br />

separate class. (2006-12-20)<br />

4583. Geopyxis (Pers.) Sacc.<br />

Zhuang & Liu (2006) emended the generic<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cept of Geopyxis to accommodate species<br />

with ornamented and guttulate ascospores and<br />

presented morphological and nuSSU rDNA<br />

sequence data to support their emendati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

(2006-12-20)<br />

68<br />

4650. Gilkeya M.E. Sm., Trappe & Rizzo<br />

Gilkeya is described as a m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus for an<br />

ectomycorrhizal fungus in Pyrenomataceae<br />

(Smith et al. 2006). The new genus is similar to<br />

Genea, but differs in having globose ascospores,<br />

vinaceous peridium and lack of a basal tuft of<br />

hyphae. In the phylogenetic analyses using nu<br />

LSU rDNA sequences, the genus is sister to<br />

Genea. (2007-06-05)<br />

4508. Gli<strong>on</strong>ectria Crous & C.L. Schoch<br />

Crous & Schoch (in Schoch et al. 2000)<br />

described the new genus Gli<strong>on</strong>ectria<br />

(Nectriaceae, Hypocreales) with the type species<br />

G. tenuis Crous & C.L. Schoch – O. Erikss<strong>on</strong> (in<br />

litt.). (2006-10-18)<br />

4651. Glomerellaceae Locq. ex Seifert & W.<br />

Gams<br />

This new family is described in Zhang et al.<br />

(2007) to accommodate the genus Glomerella.<br />

The new family is placed in Hypocreomycetidae<br />

inc. sed. (2007-06-05)<br />

4456. Glomerobolus J. Kohlmeyer & B.<br />

Volkmann-Kohlmeyer<br />

An asexual fungus isolated from standing dead<br />

leaves and culms of the black needle rush has<br />

been placed in this m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus by<br />

Kohlmeyer and Volkmann-Kohlmeyer (1996).<br />

Its relati<strong>on</strong>ship was unknown. A molecular study<br />

by Schoch et al. (2006) showed that it bel<strong>on</strong>gs to<br />

Stictidaceae in Ostropales, where it will be listed<br />

in the next outline. (2006-07-17)<br />

4584. Graphidaceae Dumort.<br />

A combined data set of mt SSU and nu LSU<br />

rDNA data was used by Staiger et al. (2006) to<br />

evaluate the revised generic c<strong>on</strong>cept in the<br />

family proposed by Staiger (2002). They c<strong>on</strong>firm<br />

that the family is paraphyletic and suggest<br />

including Thelotremataceae as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym. Given<br />

the restricted number of taxa studied so far and<br />

the poor backb<strong>on</strong>e support of the phylogenetic<br />

tree presented, we prefer to postp<strong>on</strong>e formal<br />

changes in the classificati<strong>on</strong> of the two families<br />

until a study including a wider tax<strong>on</strong> sampling


has been made. Some revised generic<br />

circumscripti<strong>on</strong>s, such as that of Glyphis,<br />

Phaeographis and Platygramme are supported,<br />

while other genera, such as Graphis and<br />

Hemithecium are shown to be n<strong>on</strong>-m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic.<br />

(2006-12-20)<br />

4509. Grosmannia Gold.<br />

This genus is re-instated by Zipfel et al. (2006);<br />

see note under Ophiostoma (4537). (2006-10-18)<br />

4652. Guignardia Viala & Ravaz<br />

Schoch et al. (2007) showed that the genus<br />

bel<strong>on</strong>gs to Botryosphaeriaceae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4653. Gyalectales Henssen & Jahns ex D.<br />

Hawksw. & O.E. Erikss.<br />

Gyalectales was shown to be nested within<br />

Ostropales by Miadlikowska et al. (2007) who<br />

discussed the possible classificati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Ostropales (Ostropales s. lat. vs. Graphidales,<br />

Gyalectales and Ostropales s.str.). Gyalectales<br />

will be included in Ostropales in the next outline.<br />

Molecular analyses including Gomphillaceae and<br />

Od<strong>on</strong>totremataceae are urgently needed for a<br />

revised classificati<strong>on</strong> in this group. (2007-06-05)<br />

4510. Gymnostellatospora Udag., Uchiy. &<br />

Kamiya<br />

Rice & Currah (2006) c<strong>on</strong>firmed that this genus<br />

is distinct from Pseudogymnoascus using ITS<br />

sequence data. Gymnostellatospora<br />

accommodates taxa with walnut-shaped<br />

ascospores with distinct l<strong>on</strong>gitudinal crests and<br />

striati<strong>on</strong>s. (2006-10-18)<br />

4511. Gyrotrema A. Frisch<br />

This m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus was described by Frisch<br />

(Frisch & Kalb 2006) to accommodate<br />

Ocellularia sinuosa; see note under<br />

Thelotremataceae (4561). (2006-10-18)<br />

4654. Helicog<strong>on</strong>ium W.L. White<br />

Suh et al. (2007) include this genus in<br />

Endomycetaceae. However, no molecular data<br />

are currently available and Baral (1999) and Ertz<br />

69<br />

and Diederich (2007) point out similarities to<br />

other mycoparasitic Helotiales. Currently, the<br />

genus is placed under Ascomycota inc. sed. and<br />

will remain there until molecular data become<br />

available that will allow us to understand the<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships of that genus. (2007-06-05)<br />

4585. Helotiales Nannf.<br />

In a phylogenetic analysis employing nu rDNA<br />

sequence data, Wang et al. (2006) found nine<br />

distinct clades within the order, which may form<br />

the basis for a future family classificati<strong>on</strong> within<br />

this order. The morphology of the clades is<br />

discussed and some of the clades corresp<strong>on</strong>d to<br />

currently recognized families, but in most the<br />

data suggest that the circumscripti<strong>on</strong>s of these<br />

need revisi<strong>on</strong>. (2006-12-20)<br />

4655. Helotiales Nannf.<br />

Wang et al. (2007) found this order to be<br />

paraphyletic with Cyttariales, Erysiphales, and<br />

Rhytismatales nested within. (2007-06-05)<br />

4656. Heyderia (Fr.) Link<br />

Wang et al. (2007) suggested transferring this<br />

genus from Helotiaceae to Hemiphacidiaceae.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4657. Himantormia I.M. Lamb<br />

The placement of this Antarctic endemic in<br />

Parmeliaceae is supported by Thell et al. (2007),<br />

but the closest relative within the family remains<br />

unknown. The genus is expanded to include<br />

Nimisia that occurs in Tierra del Fuego (see note<br />

4694). (2007-06-05)<br />

4512. Holocryphia Gryzenh. & M.J. Wingf.<br />

This genus was described by Gryzenhout et al.<br />

(2006a) to accommodate Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectria<br />

eucalypti that is distinguished by its ascospore<br />

septati<strong>on</strong> from other Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectria species and<br />

is distinct in a phylogenetic analysis. It was<br />

included in analyses of ITS data (Nakab<strong>on</strong>ge et<br />

al. 2006) and clusters near Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectria. The<br />

genus will be accepted in Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae in<br />

the next outline. (2006-10-18)


4658. Holwaya Sacc.<br />

Wang et al. (2007) suggested transferring this<br />

genus from Helotiaceae to Bulgariaceae. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4422. Hyaloscyphaceae Nannf.<br />

A phylogenetic study employing nu SSU rDNA<br />

sequences by Untereiner et al. (2006) showed the<br />

family to be polyphyletic. (2006-05-30)<br />

46<strong>59</strong>. Hymeneliaceae Körb.<br />

In the analysis by Miadlikowska et al. (2007)<br />

this family was sister to Agyriales. It will be<br />

placed in Ostropomycetidae inc. sed. in the next<br />

outline. (2007-06-05)<br />

4660. Hyphopichia v<strong>on</strong> Arx & van der Walt<br />

Kurtzman (2005) presented molecular evidence<br />

for the distincti<strong>on</strong> of this genus, which will be<br />

accepted in Saccharomycetales inc. sed. in the<br />

next outline. (2007-06-05)<br />

4661. Hypocenomyce M. Choisy<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) showed that this<br />

genus should be transferred from Lecideaceae to<br />

Ophioparmaceae, supporting earlier studies by<br />

Wedin et al. (2005). (2007-06-05)<br />

4662. Hypocreomycetidae O.E. Erikss. &<br />

Winka<br />

Schoch et al. (2007b) dem<strong>on</strong>strated the presence<br />

of a third lineage of marine fungi in this subclass<br />

in additi<strong>on</strong> to Halosphaeriales and Lulworthiales.<br />

This clade is informally named TBM clade, since<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships are not resolved with c<strong>on</strong>fidence.<br />

The genera in this clade will be placed in<br />

Hypocreomycetidae inc. sed. In the next outline.<br />

The clade includes the genera Etheirophora<br />

(previously Halosphaeriales), Juncigena<br />

(previously in Magnaporthaceae), Swampomyces<br />

and Torpedospora (both previously in<br />

Sordariomycetes inc. sed.). The placement of<br />

Bertia, Chaetosphaerella and Melanospora in<br />

the TBM clade is uncertain due to l<strong>on</strong>g branches<br />

leading to these taxa, although the placement of<br />

these groups in the Hypocreomycetidae is<br />

70<br />

supported by other studies (Zhang et al. 2007).<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4423. Hypoxyl<strong>on</strong> Bull.<br />

Beta-tubulin and alpha-actin sequence data were<br />

used by Hsieh et al. (2005) to infer phylogenetic<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships am<strong>on</strong>g several xylariaceous genera<br />

with nodulisporioid anamorphs. Hypoxyl<strong>on</strong> was<br />

found to be polyphyletic with Hypoxyl<strong>on</strong> sect.<br />

Hypoxyl<strong>on</strong> closely related to Daldinia and<br />

Hypoxyl<strong>on</strong> sect. Annulata as a distinct lineage.<br />

The latter was accepted as a separate genus<br />

Annulohypoxyl<strong>on</strong>. (2006-05-30)<br />

4663. Hysteriales Lindau<br />

The order was is not m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic with <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

three out of the four species sampled forming a<br />

clade. Although falling within the<br />

Dothideomycetes, the clade c<strong>on</strong>taining<br />

Hysterium could not be placed within the two<br />

subclasses defined (Schoch et al. 2007). (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4664. Jahnulales Pang, Abdel-Wahab, El-<br />

Sharouney, E.B.G. J<strong>on</strong>es & Sivichai<br />

The placement of this order in Dothideomycetes<br />

remains unclear based <strong>on</strong> nu SSU (Schoch et al.<br />

2007, data not shown, however). (2007-06-05)<br />

45<strong>13</strong>. Japewiella Printzen<br />

This genus was segregated from Japewia<br />

(Printzen 1999) for species differing in spore<br />

wall morphology, paraphyses branching,<br />

structure of the exciple, and the presence of<br />

atranorin. The genus will be accepted in<br />

Lecanoraceae in the next outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4665. Juncigena Kohlm., Volkm.-Kohlm. &<br />

O.E. Erikss.<br />

See note 4662 under Hypocreomycetidae. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4666. Kawasakia Y. Yamada & Nogawa<br />

See note 4677. (2007-06-05)


4514. Kazachstania Zubcova<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> different ascospore walls and<br />

molecular data Kurtzman et al. (2005) accepted<br />

this genus as distinct from Saccharomyces. It<br />

includes pathogenic yeasts occurring in birds and<br />

mammals. The genus will be accepted in<br />

Saccharomycetaceae in the next outline. (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4667. Kirschsteiniothelia D. Hawksw.<br />

This genus clustered in Dothideomycetes in the<br />

analysis by Schoch et al. (2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4668. Kodamaea Y. Yamada, T. Suzuki,<br />

Matsuda & Mikata<br />

See note 4718 under Saccharomycetes. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4515. Komagataella Y. Yamada, M Matsuda,<br />

K. Maeda & Mikata<br />

This genus is accepted by Kurtzman (2005); it<br />

will be listed in Saccharomycetaceae in the next<br />

outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4669. Kregervanrija Kurtzman<br />

Kurtzman (2006) proposed this new genus that is<br />

placed in Pichiaceae, see also note 4710 under<br />

Pichiaceae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4516. Kuraishia Y. Yamada, K. Maeda &<br />

Mikata<br />

Peter et al. (2005) used this generic name for a<br />

yeast-type isolated from wood-associated<br />

habitats. The genus will be accepted in<br />

Saccharomycetaceae in the next outline. (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4517. Lachancea Kurtzman<br />

This genus was described by Kurtzman (2003)<br />

for a m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic group of species formerly<br />

placed in Kluyveromyces, Saccharomyces and<br />

Zygosaccharomyces. It will be accepted in<br />

Saccharomycetaceae in the next outline. (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

71<br />

4518. Lachnocaul<strong>on</strong> Clem. & Shaer. nom.<br />

illeg.<br />

This genus is currently placed in Clad<strong>on</strong>iaceae. It<br />

is a later hom<strong>on</strong>ym of Lachnocaul<strong>on</strong> Kunth<br />

(1841). Acccording to Feuerer (see "Checklist of<br />

lichens and lichenicolous fungi of New<br />

Zealand"; http://www.biologie.unihamburg.de/checklists/australianewzealand/newzealand_l.htm)<br />

it is a syn<strong>on</strong>ym<br />

of Stereocaul<strong>on</strong> and hence will be treated as a<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ym of the latter in the next outline. - O.<br />

Erikss<strong>on</strong> (in litt.). (2006-10-18)<br />

4424. Lasiobolidium Malloch & Cain<br />

The placement of Lasiobolidium in<br />

Pyrenomataceae is supported Hansen et al.<br />

(2005); see note under Orbicula. (2006-05-30)<br />

4670. Lecanoromycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) presented a new<br />

phylogenetic analysis based <strong>on</strong> five different<br />

nuclear loci including over 250 taxa. The class is<br />

str<strong>on</strong>gly supported as m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic with three<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic subclasses: Acarosporomycetidae,<br />

Ostropomycetidae, Lecanoromycetidae, and<br />

Candelariaceae that cannot be placed in either of<br />

the sublclasses. (2007-06-05)<br />

4671. Lecanoromycetidae nom. nud.<br />

The circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of this subclass remains<br />

uncertain. In the study of Miadlikowska et al.<br />

(2007) the subclass including Umbilicariaceae,<br />

Rhizocarpaceae and allied families lacks support.<br />

The phylogenetic placement of these families<br />

requires additi<strong>on</strong>al studies. (2007-06-05)<br />

4672. Lecideaceae Chevall.<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) dem<strong>on</strong>strated that<br />

this family should be transferred from<br />

Lecanorales to Lecanoromycetidae inc. sed.<br />

Further, they c<strong>on</strong>firmed previous results of<br />

Buschbom & Mueller (2004) Porpidiaceae is<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ymous with this family. (2007-06-05)<br />

4673. Lecidoma Gotth. Schneid. & Hertel


Miadlikowska et al. (2007) showed that this<br />

genus needs to be transferred from Psoraceae to<br />

Lecideaceae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4519. Lentomitella Höhn.<br />

This genus is resurrected by Réblová (2006) for<br />

three species formerly in Ceratostomella that<br />

have a phaeoisaria-like anamorph in culture<br />

al<strong>on</strong>g with other morphological distincti<strong>on</strong>s. The<br />

genus is separate from Ceratostomella using data<br />

from SSU and LSU but also lies within the<br />

Sordariomycetidae inc. sed. (2006-10-18)<br />

4674. Leotiomyceta O.E. Erikss. & Winka<br />

Spatafora et al. (2007) found Leotiomyceta to be<br />

a str<strong>on</strong>gly supported m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic group in a<br />

five-gene analysis of Pezizomycotina with<br />

Pezizomycetes and Orbiliomycetes being basal<br />

to this clade. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, Leotiomyceta will<br />

be resurrected in the next outline. (2007-06-05)<br />

4586. Leotiomycetes Erikss<strong>on</strong> & Winka<br />

The m<strong>on</strong>ophyly of a core group of helotialean<br />

fungi, including Cyttariales, Erysiphales,<br />

Helotiales, Rhytismatales, and Myxotrichaceae is<br />

supported in a phylogenetic study by Wang et al.<br />

(2006). However, the sole member of<br />

Lichinomycetes (Peltula umbilicata) included in<br />

the study was nested within Leotiomycetes,<br />

which was interpreted as l<strong>on</strong>g-branch attracti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Geoglossaceae fell outside Leotiomycetes, see<br />

note under Geoglossaceae (4582). (2006-12-20)<br />

4675. Leotiomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka<br />

Wang et al. (2007) studied the phylogeny of this<br />

class using nuclear ribosomal sequences. They<br />

found str<strong>on</strong>g support for the class including the<br />

orders Cyttariales, Erysiphales, Rhytismatales, a<br />

paraphyletic Helotiales, and the families<br />

Myxotrichiaceae and Pseudoeurotiaceae that<br />

cannot be placed in either of these orders.<br />

Geoglossaceae was c<strong>on</strong>firmed as being outside<br />

the class (corroborated by Spatafora et al. 2007).<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4587. Leptosphaerulina D. McAlpine<br />

See note under Pleosporaceae (4<strong>59</strong>8). (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

72<br />

4520. Leptotrema M<strong>on</strong>t. & Bosch<br />

The genus is used in a restricted sense by Frisch<br />

(2006) including <strong>on</strong>ly L. wightii; see note under<br />

Thelotremataceae (4561). (2006-10-18)<br />

4521. Letendraea Sacc.<br />

Kruys et al. (2006) provided evidence that this<br />

genus does not bel<strong>on</strong>g to Tubeufiaceae, where it<br />

is currently placed. It will be placed in<br />

Pleosporales inc. sed. in the next outline. (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4522. Leucodect<strong>on</strong> A. Massal.<br />

This genus was resurrected by Frisch (2006); see<br />

note under Thelotremataceae (4561). (2006-10-<br />

18)<br />

4676. Lignoscripta B.D. Ryan<br />

This new genus is described for a single new<br />

lichen species collected <strong>on</strong> wood in southwestern<br />

North America (Ryan 2004). It is said to differ<br />

from the similar Xylographa by having whitish<br />

pruinose apothecial margins, black discs,<br />

bacilliform c<strong>on</strong>idia and further ascomatal<br />

characters. The genus is placed in Agyriaceae.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4677. Lipomycetaceae E.K. Novák & Zsolt<br />

Kurtzman et al. (2007) used a multigene data set<br />

to study the phylogeny of Lipomycetaceae. They<br />

c<strong>on</strong>firmed this family to be m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic and<br />

proposed a revised generic c<strong>on</strong>cept: the genera<br />

Kawasakia and Zygozyma are reduced to<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with Lipomyces and Babjevia with<br />

Dipodascopsis. (2007-06-05)<br />

4425. Lithographa Nyl.<br />

Coppins & Fryday (2006) described a new<br />

species from the Subantarctic Campbell Island<br />

that differs from previously described species in<br />

having submuriform ascospores. Septate<br />

ascospores are very rare in Agyriales and were<br />

previously known <strong>on</strong>ly in Anzina. (2006-05-30)<br />

4523. Lobariella Yoshim.


This genus was described by Yoshimura (2002)<br />

to accommodate the Lobaria crenulata group.<br />

Lobaria appeared n<strong>on</strong>-m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic in some<br />

phylogenetic studies (e.g., Thomas et al. 2002,<br />

Stenroos et al. 2003) hence supporting a generic<br />

splitting as suggested by Yoshimura. However,<br />

in multi-gene studies (Wiklund & Wedin 2003,<br />

Wedin & Wiklund 2004) the genus is supported<br />

in the traditi<strong>on</strong>al circumscripti<strong>on</strong> as<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic. Until further evidence, Lobariella<br />

will be treated within Lobaria in the outline.<br />

(2006-10-18)<br />

4588. Lobothallia (Clauzade & Cl. Roux)<br />

Hafellner<br />

See note under Megasporaceae (4<strong>59</strong>1). (2006-<br />

12-20)<br />

4524. Loflammiopsis Lücking & Kalb<br />

This genus was described by Lücking & Kalb<br />

(2000) for a new foliicolous lichen collected in<br />

the Amaz<strong>on</strong>ian rainforest. It is placed in the<br />

Pilocarpaceae in the next outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4678. Lopezaria Kalb & Hafellner<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) provided evidence<br />

that this genus should be transferred from<br />

Lecanoromycetes inc. sed. to Ramalinaceae.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4679. Lophiostomataceae Sacc.<br />

The family is polyphyletic and falls into two<br />

groups in the study by Schoch et al. (2007).<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4680. Loxosporaceae Kalb & Staiger<br />

See note 4720 under Sarrameanaceae. (2007-06-<br />

05)<br />

4589. Lueckingia Aptroot & Umana<br />

Lueckingia is described for a single new<br />

lichenized species from a single locality in a<br />

lowland forest in Costa Rica (Aptroot et al.<br />

2006). It is placed in Ramalinaceae based <strong>on</strong><br />

ascus-type. It differs from Physcidia Tuck. in<br />

having polysporous asci and other characters and<br />

73<br />

Piccolia A. Massal. by thallus morphology,<br />

ascus-type and sec<strong>on</strong>dary chemistry. The genus<br />

will be accepted in the forthcoming outline in<br />

Ramalinaceae, but additi<strong>on</strong>al studies – including<br />

molecular data – appear necessary for a proper<br />

placement of the genus. (2006-12-20)<br />

4681. Lulworthiales Kohlm., Spatafora &<br />

Volkm.-Kohlm.<br />

Tang et al. (2007) and Zhang et al. (2007)<br />

showed that the order does not fit into any of the<br />

three subclasses of Sordariomycetes. (2007-06-<br />

05)<br />

4<strong>59</strong>0. Macroventuria Aa<br />

See note under Pleosporaceae (4<strong>59</strong>8). (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

4525. Malcolmiella Vezda<br />

This genus was described by Vezda (1997) for<br />

lecideoid taxa with tube-like structures in the<br />

ascal tholus, paraplectenchymatous exciple and<br />

hal<strong>on</strong>ate ascospores. Several species were added<br />

by Lücking & Kalb (2000). This tropical genus<br />

will be accepted in the next outline and<br />

tentatively placed in Pilocarpaceae; molecular<br />

data are necessary to c<strong>on</strong>firm this placement that<br />

is based <strong>on</strong> similarities in ascus-type. (2006-10-<br />

18)<br />

4526. Malvinia Döbbeler<br />

This m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus was described by<br />

Döbbeler (2003) for a muscicolous fungus<br />

occurring in the Falkland Islands. It is placed in<br />

Ostropales inc. sed. (2006-10-18)<br />

4682. Massal<strong>on</strong>giaceae Wedin, P.M. Jørg. &<br />

E. Wiklund<br />

This new family is introduced for a<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic clade including the genera<br />

Leptochidium, Massal<strong>on</strong>gia and Polychidium<br />

(Wedin et al. 2007). These genera were<br />

previously placed inc. sed. in Peltigerinaeae<br />

(Massal<strong>on</strong>gia) or Placynthiaceae (Leptochidium,<br />

Polychidium). The new family is<br />

morphologically characterized by a similar type<br />

of ascoma development and ascus-type. (2007-<br />

06-05)


4<strong>59</strong>1. Megasporaceae Lumbsch, Feige & K.<br />

Schmitz<br />

Schmitt et al. (2006), using a combined nu LSU<br />

and mt SSU rDNA data set, c<strong>on</strong>firmed<br />

placement of the family in Pertusariales and<br />

showed that the genera Aspicilia and<br />

Lobothallia, currently placed in Hymeneliaceae,<br />

also bel<strong>on</strong>g to this family. In the next outline<br />

these two genera will be included in<br />

Megasporaceae. (2006-12-20)<br />

4683. Melanosporales nom. nud.<br />

This order is suggested in Zhang et al. (2007) but<br />

not validly described. (2007-06-05)<br />

4527. Melanotrema A. Frisch<br />

This genus was described by Frisch (Frisch &<br />

Kalb 2006); see note under Thelotremataceae<br />

(4561). (2006-10-18)<br />

4528. Menisporopascus Matsush.<br />

This genus was described by Matsushima (2003)<br />

for a species isolated from decaying litter and<br />

forming the teleomorph and a Menisporopsis<br />

anamorph in culture. It is placed in the<br />

Sordariomycetidae inc. sed. until its affinities<br />

can be established. (2006-10-18)<br />

4684. Microascales Luttr. ex Benny & Kimbr.<br />

This order was paraphyletic in the studies by<br />

Tang et al. (2007) and Zhang et al. (2007) with<br />

Halosphaeriales nested within. (2007-06-05)<br />

4685. Microglossum Gillet<br />

This genus was previously placed in<br />

Geoglossaceae, but according to Spatafora et al.<br />

(2007) it should be classified in Leotiaceae. This<br />

is also corroborated in the study by Wang et al.<br />

(2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4529. Microthia Gryzenh. & M.J. Wingf.<br />

Gryzenhout et al. (2006a) distinguished this<br />

m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus in Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae based <strong>on</strong><br />

their phylogenetic analysis and subtle<br />

74<br />

morphological differences, such as small and<br />

superficial ascomata and l<strong>on</strong>g paraphyses<br />

between c<strong>on</strong>idiophores. (2006-10-18)<br />

4686. Mollicamarops Lar. N. Vassilijeva<br />

Vassilijeva (2007) described this new genus<br />

from the Russian Far East. Mollicamarops is<br />

characterized by effused, colored, soft and thin<br />

stromata with black stellate ostioles. The stipitate<br />

asci and ellipsoid brown ascospores are similar<br />

to those found in some species of Camarops and<br />

typical for members of the Boliniaceae, where it<br />

will be included. No molecular data were<br />

included but these could help to determine if it is<br />

distinct from Camarops. (2007-06-05)<br />

4426. Moristroma A.I. Romero & Samuels<br />

The genus, which is currently placed in<br />

Teichosporaceae (Pleosporales), has been studied<br />

by Nordén et al. (2005). Their analysis of the<br />

ITS and LSU rDNA suggested a placement in<br />

Chaetothyriomycetidae instead. It differs from<br />

other Chaetothyriales, however, in lacking<br />

periphyses and hence will be classified as<br />

Chaetothyriomycetidae incertae sedis. (2006-05-<br />

30)<br />

4<strong>59</strong>2. Muhria P.M. Jørg.<br />

In a phylogenetic study employing ITS and betatubulin<br />

sequences of 49 ingroup taxa, Högnabba<br />

(2006) supported the nesting of Muhria in<br />

Stereocaul<strong>on</strong> Hoffm. and formerly syn<strong>on</strong>ymized<br />

Muhria with Sterecaul<strong>on</strong>, which will be<br />

followed in the next outline. (2006-12-20)<br />

4687. Mycosphaerellaceae Lindau<br />

The family bel<strong>on</strong>gs to Capnodiales (Schoch et al.<br />

2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4688. Myriangiales Starbäck<br />

This order is placed in Dothideomycetidae by<br />

Schoch et al. (2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4689. Myriog<strong>on</strong>ium W.L. White<br />

Suh et al. (2007) accepted this genus in<br />

Endomycetaceae. However, no molecular data


are currently available and Baral (1999) placed<br />

the genus into syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with Helicog<strong>on</strong>ium.<br />

Until more data are available, the genus will be<br />

regarded as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of Helicog<strong>on</strong>ium. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4530. Myriotrema Fée<br />

The circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of this genus is changed by<br />

Frisch (2006); see note under Thelotremataceae<br />

(4561). (2006-10-18)<br />

4690. Mytilinidiaceae Kirschst.<br />

The family is shown to bel<strong>on</strong>g to Pleosporales<br />

(Schoch et al. 2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4457. Myxotrichaceae Currah<br />

In a study <strong>on</strong> the phylogenetic positi<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Pseudogymnoascus roseus Jian & Yao (2005)<br />

found Myxotrichaceae to be polyphyletic and<br />

supported that the family is not related to<br />

Onygenales. (2006-07-17)<br />

4<strong>59</strong>3. Myxotrichaceae Currah<br />

See note under Leotiomycetes (4586). (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

4691. Myxotrichaceae Currah<br />

Wang et al. (2007) found this family to be<br />

polyphyletic. (2007-06-05)<br />

4531. Nakaseomyces Kurtzman<br />

Nakaseomyces was described by Kurtzman<br />

(2003); it will be accepted in<br />

Saccharomycetaceae in the next outline. (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4692. Nakazawaea Y. Yamada, Maeda &<br />

Mikata<br />

See note 4718 under Saccharomycetes. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4<strong>59</strong>4. Namakwa Hale<br />

75<br />

See note under Xanthoparmelia (4615). (2006-<br />

12-20)<br />

4532. Naumovia Kurtzman nom. illeg.<br />

This genus was described by Kurtzman (2003)<br />

including two species. Unfortunately, the name<br />

is a younger hom<strong>on</strong>ym of Naumovia Dobrozr.<br />

(Dothideomycetes). (2006-10-18)<br />

4533. Neococcomyces Y.R. Lin, C.T. Xiang &<br />

Z.Z. Li<br />

Lin et al. (1999) described this new genus that<br />

bel<strong>on</strong>gs to Rhytismataceae. The genus is<br />

characterized by multi-angular ascomata opening<br />

by several radial or irregular splits and<br />

bifusiform, septate ascospores. Gao & Hou<br />

(2006) recently described an additi<strong>on</strong>al species<br />

in that genus. (2006-10-18)<br />

4427. Neodasyscypha Suková & Spo<strong>on</strong>er<br />

For Dasyscyphus Fuckel, nom. illeg. this new<br />

generic name was proposed by Suková (2005),<br />

which has been proposed previously (Spo<strong>on</strong>er<br />

1987) but not validly published. Neodasyscypha<br />

will be included in the next outline in<br />

Hyaloscyphaceae. (2006-05-30)<br />

4428. Neofuscelia Essl.<br />

This genus is currently accepted in Parmeliaceae,<br />

but since molecular data have shown it to be part<br />

of Xanthoparmelia (Blanco et al. 2004), it will<br />

be treated as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of the latter in the next<br />

outline. (2006-05-30)<br />

4458. Neofuscelia Essl.<br />

This genus will be treated as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of<br />

Xanthoparmelia in the next outline; see note<br />

under Xanthoparmelia (4474). (2006-07-17)<br />

4693. Neolectomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka<br />

See note 4733. (2007-06-05)<br />

4429. Nephromopsis Müll. Arg.<br />

Thell et al. (2005) studied the phylogeny of<br />

cetrarioid lichens (Parmeliaceae) with bifusiform


c<strong>on</strong>idia, dorsiventral thalli that c<strong>on</strong>tain usnic acid<br />

using ITS, beta-tubulin, and GAPDH sequences.<br />

Tuckneraria is polyphyletic and nested within<br />

Nephromopsis. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, the c<strong>on</strong>cept of<br />

Nephromopsis is enlarged to include<br />

Tuckneraria and some species previously<br />

classified in Cetraria sensu lato. The genus has<br />

its center of distributi<strong>on</strong> in eastern Asia and<br />

includes 19 species. (2006-05-30)<br />

44<strong>59</strong>. Neuropog<strong>on</strong> Nees & Flotow<br />

This genus will be treated as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of<br />

Usnea in the next outline; see note under Usnea<br />

(4473). (2006-07-17)<br />

4534. Nigromammilla K.D. Hyde & J. Fröhl.<br />

This genus is described for a new <strong>ascomycete</strong> (as<br />

"Nigramammilla") found in Ecuador and H<strong>on</strong>g<br />

K<strong>on</strong>g (Hyde & Fröhlich 2003) that is placed in<br />

Lasiosphaeriaceae, where it is distinguished by<br />

mammiform and thin-walled ascomata and asci<br />

with a distinctive apical ring. It does not<br />

however match the c<strong>on</strong>cept for the group<br />

outlined by Huhndorf et al (2004) and will be<br />

moved to the Sordariomycetidae inc. sed. (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4694. Nimisia Kärnefelt & A. Thell<br />

This m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus is shown to bel<strong>on</strong>g to<br />

Himantormia using molecular and<br />

morphological data (Thell et al. 2007) and hence<br />

will be placed in syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with the latter genus<br />

is the forthcoming outline. (2007-06-05)<br />

4535. Notoclad<strong>on</strong>ia S. Hammer<br />

The genus Ramalea is shown to be polyphyletic<br />

with Ramalea s.str. being outside Clad<strong>on</strong>iaceae<br />

and R. cochleata being transferred to the<br />

m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus Notoclad<strong>on</strong>ia (Hammer 2003).<br />

It will be accepted in Clad<strong>on</strong>iaceae in the next<br />

outline, while Ramalea will be moved to<br />

Lecanorales inc. sed. (2006-10-18)<br />

4430. Nyungwea Sérus., Eb. Fischer &<br />

Killmann<br />

Sérusiaux et al. (2006) described a new crustose<br />

lichen collected in east Africa in this new genus.<br />

It is unusual in producing g<strong>on</strong>iocysts in pale<br />

76<br />

stipes. Its tax<strong>on</strong>omic positi<strong>on</strong> is unclear, since it<br />

is <strong>on</strong>ly known in sterile c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> and no<br />

molecular data are presented. Nyungwea will be<br />

listed as genus of uncertain affinities in the next<br />

outline. (2006-05-30)<br />

4536. Ocellularia G. Mey.<br />

The circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of this genus is changed by<br />

Frisch (2006); see note under Thelotremataceae<br />

(4561). (2006-10-18)<br />

4<strong>59</strong>5. Ochrolechiaceae R.C. Harris ex<br />

Lumbsch & I. Schmitt<br />

In a combined nu LSU and mt SSU rDNA<br />

sequence analysis Schmitt et al. (2006) showed<br />

that Ochrolechia and the “Variolaria” and<br />

“Varicellaria” groups of Pertusaria do not<br />

bel<strong>on</strong>g to Pertusariaceae and hence the<br />

previously proposed family Ochrolechiaceae is<br />

resurrected and validly described. In the next<br />

outline Ochrolechiaceae will be accepted as a<br />

family within Pertusariales. (2006-12-20)<br />

4460. Oevstedalia Ertz & Diederich<br />

This new genus is described for an Antarctic<br />

endemic species that is shown to be distinct from<br />

Trimmatothele, in which it was classified<br />

previously. The new genus is characterized by<br />

pale ascomata with a hyphal wall,<br />

pseudoparaphyses, an I- center, and<br />

subcylindrical, thin-walled asci, and the<br />

producti<strong>on</strong> of ascoc<strong>on</strong>idia (Ertz & Diederich<br />

2004). The authors compare the genus to<br />

Epigloeaceae. It will be listed as genus of<br />

uncertain affinities in the next outline. (2006-07-<br />

17)<br />

4695. Ogataea Y. Yamada, Maeda & Mikata<br />

This genus was recently accepted by Morais et<br />

al. (2004) and Peter et al. (2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4<strong>59</strong>6. Okeanomyces K.L. Pang & E.B.G.<br />

J<strong>on</strong>es<br />

This genus was described for Halosphaeria<br />

cucullata, which was shown by Pang et al.<br />

(2004) not to be c<strong>on</strong>generic with the type species<br />

of Halosphaeria. It will be accepted in


Halosphaeriaceae in the next outline. (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

4696. Ophioparmaceae R.W. Rogers &<br />

Hafellner<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) dem<strong>on</strong>strated that<br />

this family should be transferred from<br />

Lecanorales to Lecanoromycetidae inc. sed.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4537. Ophiostoma Syd. & P. Syd.<br />

The heterogeneity of the genus has been<br />

supported in a multi-gene phylogenetic study by<br />

Zipfel et al. (2006). Two distinct groups are<br />

segregated at generic level and will be accepted<br />

in the next outline. Species with Leptographium<br />

anamorphs are included in the genus<br />

Grosmannia, while the genus Ceratocystiopsis<br />

includes cycloheximide-sensitive species with<br />

short perithecial necks, falcate ascospores and<br />

Hyalorhinocladiella anamorphs. (2006-10-18)<br />

4431. Orbicula Cooke<br />

The placement of this cleistothecial genus in<br />

Pyrenomataceae is supported by a phylogenetic<br />

study using nu SSU rDNA sequences (Hansen et<br />

al. 2005). Orbicula parietina and Lasiobolidium<br />

orbiculoides, a sec<strong>on</strong>d cleistothecial fungus,<br />

studied by Hansen et al. (2005), were deeply<br />

nested within Pyrenomataceae. (2006-05-30)<br />

4697. Otidea (Pers.) B<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The phylogeny of this genus is examined by Liu<br />

and Zhuang (2006) using nu LSU rDNA<br />

sequences. The genus is shown to be<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic including Flavoscypha and<br />

Otideopsis. (2007-06-05)<br />

4698. Otideopsis B. Liu & J.Z. Cao<br />

Liu and Zhuang (2006) reduced this genus into<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with Otidea (see note 4697). (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4699. Oxneria S. K<strong>on</strong>dratyuk & Kärnefelt<br />

See note 4735. (2007-06-05)<br />

77<br />

4700. Pachyphysis R.C. Harris & Ladd<br />

This genus is described for a crustose lichen<br />

found <strong>on</strong> calcareous rocks in eastern North<br />

America (Harris & Ladd 2007). It is related to<br />

Farnoldia and Melanolecia (Buschbom &<br />

Mueller 2004), but differs from these genera in<br />

paraphyses and apothecial pigmentati<strong>on</strong>. The<br />

genus is tentatively placed in Porpidiaceae. This<br />

family cannot be distinguished from<br />

Lecideaceae. Additi<strong>on</strong>al studies <strong>on</strong> the generic<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cept in the group are urgently needed. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4538. Paragaeumannomyces Matsush.<br />

This genus was described by Matsushima (2003)<br />

for a species with distinctive spherical cells in<br />

the outer ascomatal wall. The species described<br />

is the same as Chaetosphaeria raciborskii, so the<br />

genus is c<strong>on</strong>sidered a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of<br />

Chaetosphaeria in the Chaetosphaeriaceae.<br />

(2006-10-18)<br />

4461. Parasiphula Kantvilas & Grube<br />

This new genus is described to accommodate the<br />

Siphula complanata- and S. fragilis-groups<br />

(Grube & Kantvilas 2006). Using nu LSU and<br />

ITS rDNA sequences, the new genus is shown to<br />

bel<strong>on</strong>g to Coccotremataceae, while Siphula s.str.<br />

bel<strong>on</strong>gs to Icmadophilaceae. Parasiphula<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sists of species restricted to cool to cold<br />

latitudes of the Southern Hemisphere, which is<br />

also the center of distributi<strong>on</strong> of Coccotrema.<br />

The authors show a remarkable case of parallel<br />

evoluti<strong>on</strong> of lineages that have lost sexual stages<br />

and propagate via thallus fragments in two<br />

families of Ostropomycetidae. (2006-07-17)<br />

4539. Paratalaromyces Matsush.<br />

This genus was described by Matsushima (2003)<br />

for a species isolated from soil and forming the<br />

teleomorph and a Penicillium anamorph in<br />

culture. It is placed in the Eurotiomycetidae inc.<br />

sed. until its affinities can be established. (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4462. Parmelaria D.D. Awasthi<br />

This genus was nested within Parmotrema A.<br />

Massal. in a phylogenetic study by Blanco et al.<br />

(2005). However, independence of the genus


could not be rejected significantly and hence the<br />

authors did not suggest to reduce the genus under<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ymy under Parmotrema until additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

data becomes available. Parmelaria is therefore<br />

accepted in the outline until more data clarify the<br />

phylogenetic placement of the genus. (2006-07-<br />

17)<br />

4701. Per<strong>on</strong>eutypa Berl.<br />

Carmaran et al. (2007) resurrected this genus for<br />

a m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic clade of species characterized by<br />

a special type of ascus (“type 2 asci”) in<br />

Diatrypaceae. It will be accepted in the next<br />

outline. (2007-06-05)<br />

4<strong>59</strong>7. Pertusariaceae Körb. ex Körb.<br />

Schmitt et al. (2006) showed that the family in<br />

the current circumscripti<strong>on</strong> is heterogeneous and<br />

restricted the family to Loxosporopsis Brodo,<br />

Henssen & Imshaug and Pertusaria DC. s. str.,<br />

which will be followed in the next outline.<br />

(2006-12-20)<br />

4432. Peterjamesia D. Hawksw.<br />

For nomenclatural reas<strong>on</strong>s this new generic<br />

name is introduced to accommodate two taxa<br />

previously placed in Sclerophytomyces Cif. &<br />

Tomas., which is an illegitimate name<br />

(Hawksworth 2006). (2006-05-30)<br />

4702. Pezizales C. Bessey<br />

Hansen and Pfister (2007) presented a treatment<br />

of this order of operculate discomycetes that<br />

included a two-gene analysis of nuclear<br />

ribosomal sequences. Basically their results<br />

agree with those previously presented (Landvik<br />

et al. 1997). The order is supported as<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic with three major clades, each<br />

including several families. Pyrenomataceae is<br />

not m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic with Ascodesmiaceae and<br />

Glaziellaceae nested within. However, additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

data are necessary before nomenclatural<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sequences can be drawn. (2007-06-05)<br />

4703. Pezizomycotina O.E. Erikss. & Winka<br />

In a five-gene analysis including nine classes<br />

Spatafora et al. (2007) studied the phylogeny of<br />

Pezizomycotina. The subphylum is str<strong>on</strong>gly<br />

78<br />

supported as m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic with Orbiliomycetes<br />

being basal (basal positi<strong>on</strong> lacks support) and<br />

Pezizomycetes being sister to Leotiomyceta.<br />

Within Leotiomycetes the currently accepted<br />

classes are supported as m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic with the<br />

excepti<strong>on</strong> of Leotiomycetes. Geoglossaceae<br />

cluster with a single Lichinomycete tax<strong>on</strong><br />

included in the study. The tree topology<br />

resembles that found in a study including clades<br />

from all fungi by James et al. (2006). (2007-06-<br />

05)<br />

4704. Phaffomyces Y. Yamada, Higashi, S.<br />

Ando & Mikata<br />

See note 4718 under Saccharomycetes. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4705. Phlyctidaceae Poelt & Vezda ex J.C.<br />

David & D. Hawksw.<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) showed that this<br />

family should be placed in Ostropales, which<br />

agrees with previous molecular studies (e.g.,<br />

Wedin et al. 2005). (2007-06-05)<br />

4706. Phoebus R.C. Harris & Ladd<br />

This new genus in Roccellaceae is described for<br />

a crustose lichen found <strong>on</strong> calcareous rocks in<br />

eastern North America (Harris & Ladd 2007)<br />

and will be accepted in this family in the next<br />

outline. (2007-06-05)<br />

4707. Physciaceae Zahlbr.<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) dem<strong>on</strong>strated that<br />

this family (including Caliciaceae) should be<br />

transferred from Lecanorales to Teloschistales.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4708. Piceomphale Svrcek<br />

Wang et al. (2007) suggested transferring this<br />

genus from Helotiales inc. sed. to<br />

Rutstroemiaceae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4709. Pichia Hansen<br />

See note 4710 under Pichiaceae. (2007-06-05)


4710. Pichiaceae Zender<br />

Suh et al. (2007) accepted this family as separate<br />

from Saccharomycetaceae. This will be followed<br />

in the next outline. The following genera will be<br />

placed in Pichiaceae: Dekkera, Kregervanrija,<br />

Pichia, and Saturnispora. (2007-06-05)<br />

4540. Piedraiaceae Viégas ex Cif., Bat. &<br />

Campos<br />

This family is shown to bel<strong>on</strong>g to Myriangiales<br />

(Kruys et al. 2006), where it will be placed in the<br />

next outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4711. Piedraiaceae Viégas ex Cif., Bat. &<br />

Campos<br />

Piedraiaceae will be placed in Capnodiales in the<br />

next outline, as a result of the phylogenetic<br />

analyses by Schoch et al. (2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4712. Placynthiaceae Å.E. Dahl<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) dem<strong>on</strong>strated that<br />

this family should be transferred from<br />

Peltigerineae to Collematineae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4463. Plectocarp<strong>on</strong> Fée<br />

This genus is m<strong>on</strong>ographed by Ertz et al. (2005).<br />

They accept 32 species of lichenicolous species.<br />

The distincti<strong>on</strong> to similar genera in Arth<strong>on</strong>iales<br />

are discussed and a key to the genera of<br />

Arth<strong>on</strong>iales including lichenicolous taxa is<br />

presented. (2006-07-17)<br />

4<strong>59</strong>8. Pleosporaceae Nitschke<br />

Kodsueb et al. (2006) examined the phylogenetic<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships of the Pleosporaceae using nu LSU<br />

sequence data. They identified five clades<br />

c<strong>on</strong>taining fungi that are currently classified in<br />

the family (A1, A2, B, D, G). The relati<strong>on</strong>ships<br />

am<strong>on</strong>g these clades have no support and two of<br />

the clades c<strong>on</strong>taining Pleospora, Pyrenophora,<br />

Cochliobolus and Setosphaeria have little<br />

support except at the terminal branches. The<br />

clade c<strong>on</strong>taining Leptosphaerulina and<br />

Macroventuria has str<strong>on</strong>g bootstrap and<br />

Bayesian support as does the Wettsteinina clade<br />

that also includes Pleomassaria siparia. Another<br />

clade with str<strong>on</strong>g support is Kirschsteiniothelia<br />

79<br />

elaterascus with Massarina ramunculicola. The<br />

polyphyletic nature of Kirschsteiniothelia and its<br />

removal from the Pleosporaceae based <strong>on</strong> the<br />

type species, K. aethiops, has already been<br />

discussed elsewhere (see Note 4397).<br />

Wettsteinina is separate from the clades<br />

c<strong>on</strong>taining Pleospora species and should<br />

probably be removed from the Pleosporaceae. It<br />

will be listed am<strong>on</strong>g Dothideomycetes inc. sed.<br />

until more sequence data are available. The<br />

family placement for Leptosphaerulina and<br />

Macroventuria is also unclear. They appear<br />

separate from the other Pleosporaceae but the<br />

backb<strong>on</strong>e support of the phylogenetic tree is<br />

poor. They will be listed am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

Dothideomycetes inc. sed. until more sequence<br />

data are available. (2006-12-20)<br />

47<strong>13</strong>. Pleosporomycetidae Schoch, Spatafora,<br />

Crous & Shoemaker<br />

This new subclass is described to accommodate<br />

pseudoparaphysate taxa mainly represented by<br />

the Pleosporales in Schoch et al. (2007). (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4714. Pneumocystidomycetes O.E. Erikss. &<br />

Winka<br />

See note 4733. (2007-06-05)<br />

4433. Podospora Ces.<br />

See note under Schizothecium. (2006-05-30)<br />

4541. Podostroma P. Karst.<br />

Chamberlain et al. (2004) include Podostroma in<br />

Hypocrea based <strong>on</strong> similarities of microscopic<br />

and anamorphic characters. The genus will be<br />

included in Hypocrea in the next outline. (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4542. Polysporella Wor<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Wor<strong>on</strong>ichin (1916) described this genus with the<br />

type species P. wor<strong>on</strong>owii Wor<strong>on</strong>.<br />

(Mycosphaerellaceae) – O. Erikss<strong>on</strong> (in. litt.).<br />

(2006-10-18)<br />

4543. Polysporinopsis Vezda


This genus is shown to be polyphyletic by Crewe<br />

et al. (2006) and the type (P. sinopica) is shown<br />

to bel<strong>on</strong>g to Acarospora s.str. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, the<br />

genus will be treated as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of<br />

Acarospora in the next outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4464. Porina Müll. Arg.<br />

See note under Porinaceae (4465). (2006-07-17)<br />

4465. Porinaceae Reichenb.<br />

The phylogeny within this family is inferred by<br />

Baloch and Grube (2006) using mt SSU rDNA<br />

sequences. Previously different generic c<strong>on</strong>cepts<br />

were applied in this family resulting in deviating<br />

classificati<strong>on</strong>s (Hafellner & Kalb 1995, Harris<br />

1995, McCarthy 2003). The inferred phylogeny<br />

does not support any of these c<strong>on</strong>cepts:<br />

Clathroporina Müll. Arg. and Segestria Fr.,<br />

accepted by Harris (1995), are polyphyletic;<br />

Hafellner and Kalb (1995) accepted<br />

Pseudosagedia (Müll. Arg.) M. Choisy, which is<br />

polyphyletic; Trichothelium Müll. Arg. is<br />

polyphyletic in the circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of Harris<br />

(1995) and nested within Porina in the<br />

circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of McCarthy (2003). The<br />

authors do not suggest any formal c<strong>on</strong>sequences,<br />

but distinguish four main clades within the<br />

family that are mostly characterized by a<br />

combinati<strong>on</strong> of characters, although n<strong>on</strong>e of<br />

these characters uniquely characterizes a group.<br />

(2006-07-17)<br />

4<strong>59</strong>9. Porinella R. Sant.<br />

This new name was described in Vezda (2004b)<br />

for Porinula Vezda, which is a younger<br />

hom<strong>on</strong>ym of Porinula (Nyl. ex Hue) Flagey.<br />

However, Porinula Vezda was included in<br />

Caprettia Bat. & H. Maia by Serusiaux and<br />

Lücking (2003), which is followed here. In the<br />

next outline Porinella and Porinula Vezda will<br />

be treated as syn<strong>on</strong>yms of Caprettia, which is<br />

placed in M<strong>on</strong>oblastiaceae following Serusiaux<br />

and Lücking (2003). (2006-12-20)<br />

4600. Porinula Vezda<br />

See note under Porinella (4<strong>59</strong>9). (2006-12-20)<br />

4715. Porpidiaceae Hertel & Hafellner<br />

80<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) dem<strong>on</strong>strated that<br />

this family should be transferred from<br />

Lecanorales to Lecanoromycetidae inc. sed.<br />

Further, they c<strong>on</strong>firmed previous results of<br />

Buschbom & Mueller (2004) that this family<br />

cannot be distinguished from Lecideaceae.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sequently, it will be placed into syn<strong>on</strong>ymy<br />

with Lecideaceae in the next outline. (2007-06-<br />

05)<br />

4544. Potridiscus Döbbeler & Triebel<br />

This muscicolous genus was described by<br />

Döbbeler & Triebel (2000) and is placed in<br />

Helotiales inc. sed. in the next outline. (2006-10-<br />

18)<br />

4434. Protoparmeliopsis M. Choisy<br />

This genus is currently accepted in the outline. It<br />

is a name available for the Lecanora muralis<br />

group in the heterogeneous genus Lecanora.<br />

However, since currently we lack sufficient data,<br />

the genus will be listed as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of<br />

Lecanora until further data become available.<br />

(2006-05-30)<br />

4435. Protothelenellaceae Vezda, H.<br />

Mayrhofer & Poelt<br />

This family is currently placed incertae sedis, but<br />

Schmitt et al. (2005) dem<strong>on</strong>strated it bel<strong>on</strong>gs to<br />

Ostropomycetidae. Its exact placement is<br />

uncertain and it will be placed in<br />

Ostropomycetidae incertae sedis in the next<br />

outline. (2006-05-30)<br />

4545. Pseudocalopadia Lücking<br />

This genus was described to accommodate a<br />

foliicolous lichen that is morphologically<br />

somewhat intermediate between Barubia and<br />

Calopadia (Lücking 1999). It will be accepted in<br />

Pilocarpaceae in the next outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4546. Pseudogymnoascus Raillo<br />

Rice & Currah (2006) c<strong>on</strong>firmed that this genus<br />

is distinct from Gymnostellatospora using ITS<br />

sequence data. Pseudogymnoascus includes<br />

species with smooth to verrucose or lobatereticulate<br />

ascospores. (2006-10-18)


4601. Pseudolignincola Chatmala & E.B.G.<br />

J<strong>on</strong>es<br />

This genus is described for a new species<br />

isolated from plant substratum in Thai<br />

mangroves. It is characterized by having clavate<br />

asci with truncate, thickened apices, a pore and<br />

plasmalemma retracti<strong>on</strong> and cylindrical<br />

ascospores without appendages. The genus is<br />

morphologically similar to Lignincola but differs<br />

in the size of ascomata, asci and ascospores, and<br />

septati<strong>on</strong> of the latter. In a phylogenetic analysis<br />

of partial nu SSU rDNA sequences, the two<br />

genera were not closely related.<br />

Pseudolignincola will be accepted in<br />

Halosphaeriaceae in the next outline. (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

4466. Pseudosagedia (Müll. Arg.) M. Choisy<br />

See note under Porinaceae (4465). (2006-07-17)<br />

4547. Pulveria Malloch & C.T. Rogers<strong>on</strong><br />

Stadler et al. (2005) treated Pulveria as a<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ym of Pyrenomyxa Morgan (Xylariaceae,<br />

Xylariales). – O. Erikss<strong>on</strong> (in litt.). (2006-10-18)<br />

4548. Pyrenomyxa Morgan<br />

Stadler et al. (2005) accepted and emended the<br />

genus Pyrenomyxa (Xylariaceae, Xylariales) –<br />

O. Erikss<strong>on</strong> (in litt.). (2006-10-18)<br />

4549. Pyrenulales Fink ex D. Hawksw. & O.E.<br />

Erikss.<br />

See note under Trypetheliaceae (4563). (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4550. Ramalea Nyl.<br />

See note under Notoclad<strong>on</strong>ia (4535). (2006-10-<br />

18)<br />

4551. Redingeria A. Frisch<br />

This genus was described by Frisch (Frisch &<br />

Kalb 2006); see note under Thelotremataceae<br />

(4561). (2006-10-18)<br />

81<br />

4436. Regiocrella Chaverri & K.T. Hodge<br />

This genus is described with two newly<br />

described species collected in Camero<strong>on</strong> and<br />

China, which are parasites <strong>on</strong> scale insects<br />

(Chaverri et al. 2006). The new genus is<br />

classified in Clavicipitaceae (Hypocreales).<br />

Morphological and molecular evidence are<br />

presented that show the relati<strong>on</strong>ships of the new<br />

genus and its distinctiveness. Morphologically<br />

the genus is characterized by perithecia partly<br />

immersed in a subiculum, n<strong>on</strong>capitate asci,<br />

unicellular fusiform ascospores and pycnidialacervular<br />

c<strong>on</strong>idiomata. (2006-05-30)<br />

4716. Rhizocarpaceae M. Choisy ex Hafellner<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) dem<strong>on</strong>strated that<br />

this family should be transferred from<br />

Lecanorales to Lecanoromycetidae inc. sed.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4602. Rhytismatales M.E. Barr ex Minter<br />

See note under Leotiomycetes (4586). (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

4552. Rostraureum Gryzenh. & M.J. Wingf.<br />

This genus, currently classified as Diaporthales<br />

inc. sed., will be placed in Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae<br />

following Gryzenhout et al. (2006); see note<br />

under Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae (4497). (2006-10-18)<br />

4717. Rusavskia S. K<strong>on</strong>dratyuk & Kärnefelt<br />

See note 4735. (2007-06-05)<br />

4553. Sablicola E.B.G. J<strong>on</strong>es, K.L. Pang &<br />

Vrijmoed<br />

Sablicola (as "Sablecola") was described as a<br />

new genus in Pang et al. (2004) to accommodate<br />

marine fungus with ascospores having two polar<br />

and four equatorial, flattened, attenuate, straplike<br />

appendages with parallel striati<strong>on</strong>s, which<br />

disintegrate in seawater. The genus is placed in<br />

Halosphaeriaceae and will be accepted in the<br />

next outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4603. Saccharata Denman & Crous


This genus in Botryosphaeriaceae was described<br />

for an <strong>ascomycete</strong> occurring <strong>on</strong> Proteaceae<br />

(Crous et al. 2004). The genus differs from<br />

Botryosphaeria s.str. by having unilocular<br />

ascomata that develop under a clypeus. It formed<br />

an isolated clade in a phylogenetic analysis of<br />

the family (Crous et al. 2006). (2006-12-20)<br />

4718. Saccharomycetes Kudrjanzev<br />

Suh et al. (2007) provided an overview of the<br />

classificati<strong>on</strong> of the class and presented a new<br />

phylogenetic analysis. Numerous changes are<br />

proposed, these are listed under the family and<br />

generic names, when based <strong>on</strong> recent<br />

publicati<strong>on</strong>s. Further they suggested accepting<br />

the following previously described genera that<br />

were not accepted in Myc<strong>on</strong>et: Kodamaea,<br />

Nakazawaea, Phaffomyces, Starmera,<br />

Starmerella, and Yamadazyma. These genera<br />

will be accepted in the next outline in<br />

Saccharomycetales inc. sed. (2007-06-05)<br />

4604. Santess<strong>on</strong>ia Hale & Vobis<br />

The circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of this genus is modified by<br />

Follmann (2006) to include Pacific-Andean<br />

species previously classified in Roccella DC.<br />

(Arth<strong>on</strong>iaceae). The morphological similarities<br />

of these unrelated genera is interpreted as<br />

adaptati<strong>on</strong> to similar ecological niches that are<br />

occupied by these lichens. (2006-12-20)<br />

4605. Sarcoleotia Ito & S. Imai<br />

In a molecular phylogeny by Wang et al. (2006)<br />

this genus clustered with Geoglossaceae with<br />

str<strong>on</strong>g support and hence the genus will be<br />

transferred from Helotiaceae to Geoglossaceae in<br />

the next outline. (2006-12-20)<br />

4719. Sarcoleotia Ito & S. Imai<br />

Wang et al. (2007) suggested transfering this<br />

genus from Helotiaceae to Rutstroemiaceae.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4720. Sarrameanaceae Hafellner<br />

The relati<strong>on</strong>ships of Loxospora and Sarrameana<br />

were discussed by Kantvilas (2000) who noted<br />

that they are very closely related. Hence<br />

Loxosporaceae was placed into syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with<br />

82<br />

Sarrameanaceae (Kantvilas 2000, 2004). This<br />

will be accepted in the forthcoming outline. The<br />

family will be placed in Ostropomycetidae inc.<br />

sed. following the results of the study by<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007). (2007-06-05)<br />

4721. Saturnispora Liu & Kurtzman<br />

See note 4710 under Pichiaceae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4437. Schaereria Th. Fr.<br />

Schaereria is currently placed in Agyriaceae, but<br />

recent molecular studies suggest that it does not<br />

bel<strong>on</strong>g here (e.g., Lumbsch et al. 2004, Wedin et<br />

al. 2005). Its phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships are<br />

uncertain, but since it is not closely related to<br />

Agyriaceae it will be treated as a separate family<br />

Schaereriaceae Hafellner in the next outline.<br />

(2006-05-30)<br />

4722. Schizosaccharomycetes O.E. Erikss. &<br />

Winka<br />

See note 4733. (2007-06-05)<br />

4438. Schizothecium Corda<br />

Cai et al. (2005a) in a phylogenetic study using<br />

partial LSU, ITS, and partial beta-tubulin, found<br />

that Schizothecium formed a distinct wellsupported<br />

clade while Podospora is<br />

polyphyletic. Schizothecium is also distinguished<br />

by the morphological character of swollen<br />

agglutinated hairs <strong>on</strong> the ascomata but ascal and<br />

ascospore morphological characters overlap with<br />

the genus Podospora. Ascospore shape is<br />

thought to be phylogenetically informative at the<br />

species level, however gelatinous ascospore<br />

appendages appear to be less informative. (2006-<br />

05-30)<br />

4439. Sclerophyt<strong>on</strong> Eschw.<br />

The genus is revised and enlarged to include<br />

species with hyaline, macrocephalic ascospores,<br />

thick septa, clavate-cylindrical asci and ascomata<br />

in pseudostromata (Sparrius 2004). (2006-05-30)<br />

4440. Sclerophytomyces Cif. & Tomas.


Taxa with wide paraphysoids and pigmented<br />

ascospores are segregated from Sclerophyt<strong>on</strong> by<br />

Sparrius (2004) in the genus Sclerophytomyces<br />

(as “Scleorphyt<strong>on</strong>omyces”). This generic name,<br />

however, is illegitimate; see note under<br />

Peterjamesia. (2006-05-30)<br />

4723. Scoliciosporum A. Massal.<br />

In the study of Miadlikowska et al. (2007) this<br />

genus, as in numerous previous studies did not<br />

cluster with other Lecanoraceae. Hence the<br />

family Scoliciosporaceae will be resurrected in<br />

the next outline and accepted in Lecanorales.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4467. Segestria Fr.<br />

See note under Porinaceae (4465). (2006-07-17)<br />

4606. Septotrapelia Aptroot & Chaves<br />

Septotrapelia is described for two species<br />

(Aptroot et al. 2006) and is placed in<br />

Pilocarpaceae based <strong>on</strong> the ascus-type. Within<br />

the family the genus is unique by having a<br />

squamulose thallus and 3-septate ascospores.<br />

The genus will be accepted in the forthcoming<br />

outline in Pilocarpaceae, additi<strong>on</strong>al studies are<br />

necessary to show which genus is the closest<br />

relative. (2006-12-20)<br />

4607. Servitia M.S. Christ. & Alstrup<br />

This genus was described for a peltate Arctic<br />

lichen that is morphologically similar to<br />

Placopyrenium Breuss (Alstrup & Hansen 2001).<br />

It is placed in Verrucariaceae. (2006-12-20)<br />

4554. Shiraia P. Henn.<br />

This genus is currently placed with uncertain<br />

affinities in<br />

Dothideomycetes/Chaetothyriomycetes and was<br />

shown to bel<strong>on</strong>g to Pleosporales by Kruys et al.<br />

(2006). (2006-10-18)<br />

4468. Siphula Fr.<br />

This genus is shown to be polyphyletic and the<br />

Siphula complanata- and S. fragilis-groups were<br />

segregated as a new genus Parasiphula (Grube<br />

83<br />

& Kantvilas 2006); see note under Parasiphula.<br />

The placement of Siphula s.str. in<br />

Icmadophilaceae is supported. (2006-07-17)<br />

4724. Sivanesaniella Gawande & Agarwal<br />

This new genus in Venturiaceae is described by<br />

Gawande and Agarwal (2004) for a<br />

phytopathogenic fungus collected in India. The<br />

genus is similar to Apiosporina and Venturia, but<br />

differs in having hyaline, naviculate ascospores.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4469. Sordariaceae G. Winter<br />

Cai et al. (2006) in a phylogenetic study using<br />

partial LSU, ITS, and partial beta-tubulin, found<br />

that Apodus and Diplogelasinospora segregated<br />

outside the well-supported Sordariaceae clade<br />

and am<strong>on</strong>g taxa currently placed in the<br />

Lasiosphaeriaceae. The two Apodus species did<br />

not group together and the type species of<br />

Diplogelasinospora was not included. Species in<br />

both genera are reported to have the presence of<br />

a spore septum and a hyaline or pale basal cell,<br />

both of which are more characteristic of taxa in<br />

the Lasiosphaeriaceae. Both genera will be<br />

included in that family in the next outline. (2006-<br />

07-17)<br />

4725. Sordariomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka<br />

Zhang et al. (2007) discussed the evoluti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

this class of fungi and presented a new<br />

phylogenetic analysis based <strong>on</strong> four different<br />

nuclear loci. The class is str<strong>on</strong>gly supported as<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic with three m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic<br />

subclasses: Hypocreomycetidae,<br />

Sordariomycetidae, Xylariomycetidae, and<br />

Lulworthiales that cannot be placed in either of<br />

the sublclasses. In a parallel study employing a<br />

somewhat different tax<strong>on</strong> and gene sampling,<br />

Tang et al. (2007) came to very similar results.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

4608. Spathaspora Nguyen, S.O. Suh & M.<br />

Blackw.<br />

This new genus was described by Nguyen et al.<br />

(2006) for a yeast isolated from a wood-boring<br />

beetle. (2006-12-20)


4555. Sporormiaceae Munk<br />

M<strong>on</strong>ophyly of this family (including<br />

Eremodothis) is str<strong>on</strong>gly supported by Kruys et<br />

al. (2006). (2006-10-18)<br />

4726. Squamarina Poelt<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) showed that this<br />

genus should be transferred from Ramalinaceae<br />

to Stereocaulaceae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4727. Starmera Y. Yamada, Higashi, S. Ando<br />

& Mikata<br />

See note 4718 under Saccharomycetes. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4728. Starmerella Rosa & Lachance<br />

See note 4718 under Saccharomycetes. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4556. Stegobolus M<strong>on</strong>t.<br />

This genus was resurrected by Frisch & Kalb<br />

(2006); see note under Thelotremataceae (4561).<br />

(2006-10-18)<br />

4729. Stephanoascus M.T. Sm., Van der Walt<br />

& Johannsen<br />

The genus was shown to be polyphyletic by<br />

Kurtzman & Robnett (2007) with the type<br />

species clustering in Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascus.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sequently, Stephanoascus is placed into<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with that genus. (2007-06-05)<br />

4557. Stephan<strong>on</strong>ectria Schroers & Samuels<br />

This m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus is segregated from<br />

Nectriella (Schroers et al. 1999) and will be<br />

listed in Bi<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae in the next outline.<br />

(2006-10-18)<br />

4441. Stereocaulaceae Chevall.<br />

The phylogeny of this family was studied by<br />

Myllys et al. (2005) using beta-tubulin, GAPDH<br />

and SSU rDNA sequences. The placement of<br />

Lepraria in Stereocaulaceae was c<strong>on</strong>firmed and<br />

Muhria was nested within Stereocaul<strong>on</strong>. This<br />

84<br />

agrees with the analysis of Ekman & Tønsberg<br />

(2002). Myllys et al. (2005) discussed<br />

morphological characters that support a<br />

placement of Muhria in Stereocaul<strong>on</strong> including<br />

similar ascoma development, crustose growth<br />

form, and the sec<strong>on</strong>dary metabolites to some<br />

Stereocaul<strong>on</strong> spp. Cephalodia, which are<br />

characteristic for fruticose Stereocaul<strong>on</strong> spp., are<br />

not formed by the crustose taxa, nor in Muhria.<br />

Hence, Muhria will be treated as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of<br />

Stereocaul<strong>on</strong> in the next outline. The<br />

combinati<strong>on</strong> of the single species of Muhria into<br />

Stereocaul<strong>on</strong> will be made by Filip Högnabba<br />

elsewhere (Högnabba, pers. comm.). (2006-05-<br />

30)<br />

4442. Stirt<strong>on</strong>iella D.J. Galloway, Hafellner &<br />

Elix<br />

This new genus in Ramalinaceae is described for<br />

a species previously included in Catillaria. The<br />

authors provide tabular comparis<strong>on</strong>s with many<br />

similar genera (Galloway et al. 2005). (2006-05-<br />

30)<br />

4730. Strangospora Körb.<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) provided evidence<br />

that this genus should be transferred from<br />

Lecanoromycetes inc. sed. to Lecanorales inc.<br />

sed. (2007-06-05)<br />

4731. Sugiyamaella Kurtzman & Robnett<br />

The genus was described by Kurtzman &<br />

Robnett (2007) for a m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic clade of<br />

yeasts that are sister to the genus<br />

Wickerhamiella. It will be accepted in the next<br />

outline in Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascaceae. (2007-06-05)<br />

4609. Sungaiicola Fryar & K.D. Hyde<br />

Fryar and Hyde (2004) described this m<strong>on</strong>otypic<br />

genus for an <strong>ascomycete</strong> from submerged wood.<br />

Morphological characters are inc<strong>on</strong>clusive and<br />

until molecular data become available this genus<br />

will be treated in Sordariomycetes inc. sed.<br />

(2006-12-20)<br />

4732. Swampomyces Kohlm. & Volkm.<br />

See note 4662 under Hypocreomycetidae. (2007-<br />

06-05)


4443. Tainosphaeria F.A. Fernández &<br />

Huhndorf<br />

Fernández & Huhndorf (2005) described this<br />

genus for <strong>on</strong>e species that differs from<br />

morphologically similar species in<br />

Chaetosphaeria and Zignoella. Tainosphaeria is<br />

characterized by perithecial ascomata with a<br />

thickened wall and a anamorph with setulose<br />

c<strong>on</strong>idia. It is classified in the Chaetosphaericeae.<br />

(2006-05-30)<br />

4558. Tapellariopsis Lücking<br />

This genus includes a foliicolous lichen that is<br />

morphologically intermediate between<br />

Tapellaria and Calopadia (Lücking 1999). It<br />

will be accepted in Pilocarpaceae in the next<br />

outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4733. Taphrinomycotina O.E. Erikss. &<br />

Winka<br />

Sugiyama et al. (2007) discussed the<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships of this subphylum and presented a<br />

new phylogenetic analysis using nuclear rDNA,<br />

beta-tubulin and RPB2 sequence data including<br />

eleven ingroup taxa. Taphrinomycetes is sister to<br />

a clade including Neolectomycetes,<br />

Pneumocystidomycetes and<br />

Schizosaccharomycetes. However, this<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ship lacks support. In a five-gene<br />

analysis of Spatafora et al. (2007)<br />

Taphrinomycetes is sister to a clade including<br />

Pneumocystidomycetes and<br />

Schizosaccharomycetes, which is sister to<br />

Neolectomycetes. In a six-gene study by James<br />

et al. (2006), the subphylum is str<strong>on</strong>gly<br />

supported as m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic. C<strong>on</strong>sequently,<br />

Taphrinomycotina will be again accepted in the<br />

outline, including four classes. (2007-06-05)<br />

4734. Taphrinomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka<br />

The class is m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic with a str<strong>on</strong>gly<br />

supported Taphrinales (including Taphrina and<br />

Protomyces), while the basal positi<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Saitoella lacks support. C<strong>on</strong>sequently, the latter<br />

genus will remain as Taphrinomycetes inc. sed.<br />

in the next outline (see also note 4733). (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

85<br />

4735. Teloschistaceae Zahlbr.<br />

K<strong>on</strong>dratyuk and Kärnefelt (2003) described three<br />

new genera: Oxneria, Rusavskia, and<br />

Xanthoanaptychia in this family. The<br />

differentiating characters of these newly<br />

described genera include mainly thallus<br />

characters. For the time being we suggest not to<br />

accept these new genera since phylogenetic<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships within the family need further<br />

resoluti<strong>on</strong> before new genera can be<br />

circumscribed. Further, there are nomenclatural<br />

problems with the generic name Oxneria as<br />

discussed by Lindblom (2006) and the<br />

distincti<strong>on</strong> from Xanthomendoza is unclear. The<br />

circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of Rusavskia is uncertain and<br />

Xanthoanaptychia is a superfluous name for<br />

Seirophora (Søchting, pers. comm.). (2007-06-<br />

05)<br />

4736. Tephromela M. Choisy<br />

Miadlikowska et al. (2007) provided evidence<br />

that this genus should be transferred from<br />

Ramalinaceae to Mycoblastaceae. (2007-06-05)<br />

45<strong>59</strong>. Testudinaceae Arx<br />

This family will be moved from Ascomycota inc.<br />

sed. to Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes in the<br />

next outline based <strong>on</strong> the studies by Kruys et al.<br />

(2006). (2006-10-18)<br />

4737. Testudinaceae Arx<br />

In the study by Schoch et al. (2007) the family<br />

was shown to bel<strong>on</strong>g to Pleosporales. (2007-06-<br />

05)<br />

4444. Tetramelas Norman<br />

Nordin & Tibell (2005) presented a phylogenetic<br />

study, showing that the genus forms a<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic group close or including Buellia<br />

elegans and B. zoharyi. Buellia s.str. was sistergroup<br />

to the latter two species and Tetramelas.<br />

The authors interpreted their results as support<br />

for a distincti<strong>on</strong> of Tetramelas from Buellia.<br />

However, it should be noted that Buellia<br />

including Tetramelas would be m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic in<br />

their analyses as well. A wider tax<strong>on</strong> sampling<br />

will be necessary to address the issue of generic<br />

boundaries in Buellia s.lat. (2006-05-30)


4610. Thalespora Chatmala & E.B.G. J<strong>on</strong>es<br />

This new m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus includes a fungus<br />

that occurs <strong>on</strong> plant substratum in Thai<br />

mangroves. It has deliquescing asci and<br />

el<strong>on</strong>gate-cylindrical ascospores with an<br />

appendage. The genus will be accepted in<br />

Halosphaeriaceae in the next outline. (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

4445. Thelenellaceae H. Mayrhofer<br />

This family is currently placed incertae sedis, but<br />

recent molecular studies (Schmitt et al. 2005)<br />

showed it bel<strong>on</strong>gs to Ostropomycetidae. Its exact<br />

placement is uncertain and it will be placed in<br />

Ostropomycetidae incertae sedis in the next<br />

outline. (2006-05-30)<br />

4560. Thelotrema Ach.<br />

The circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of this genus is changed by<br />

Frisch (2006); see note under Thelotremataceae<br />

(4561). (2006-10-18)<br />

4561. Thelotremataceae (Nyl.) Stizenb.<br />

In a series of three papers (Frisch 2006, Frisch &<br />

Kalb 2006, Frisch et al. 2006), the generic<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cept in this family has been revised. Five new<br />

genera are described and three old names<br />

resurrected. Historically the bulk of tropical<br />

species with trentepohlioid photobi<strong>on</strong>t were<br />

placed in four schematic genera based <strong>on</strong><br />

ascospore septati<strong>on</strong> and pigmentati<strong>on</strong>. This<br />

coarse classificati<strong>on</strong> was revised by Hale (1980)<br />

who distinguished three main genera based <strong>on</strong><br />

the exciple-type (presence and absence of lateral<br />

paraphyses, presence of a columella,<br />

carb<strong>on</strong>izati<strong>on</strong> of the exciple). In their new<br />

classificati<strong>on</strong> Frisch (2006) and Frisch and Kalb<br />

(2006) distinguish 16 genera. In additi<strong>on</strong> to the<br />

characters used by Hale (1980) they employ a<br />

wide array of characters in their classificati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

including ascoma morphology, ascus<br />

morphology, paraphyses agglutinati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

epihymenium-type, ascospore pigmentati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

septati<strong>on</strong> and wall thickness, c<strong>on</strong>idia<br />

morphology, presence of vegetative propagules,<br />

thallus anatomy, sec<strong>on</strong>dary chemistry, and<br />

substrate ecology. Frisch et al. (2006) provide a<br />

molecular analysis using mt SSU rDNA<br />

sequence data to test the new classificati<strong>on</strong>. The<br />

86<br />

tax<strong>on</strong> sampling and the lack of support for most<br />

of the backb<strong>on</strong>e in the phylogeny does not allow<br />

many c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s, but some results of the<br />

molecular analysis c<strong>on</strong>tradict the proposed<br />

classificati<strong>on</strong>; however, c<strong>on</strong>sequences are not<br />

drawn by the authors. These include that the<br />

resurrected genus Stegobolus is shown to be<br />

polyphyletic and that by the acceptance of<br />

Ampliotrema the genus Ocellularia s.str.<br />

becomes paraphyletic. A number of species<br />

remain formally unclassified. Despite the<br />

provisi<strong>on</strong>al nature of the new classificati<strong>on</strong>, it<br />

certainly represents a huge step forward towards<br />

a more natural generic classificati<strong>on</strong> within the<br />

family and hence all genera suggested in Frisch<br />

(2006) and Frisch & Kalb (2006) will be<br />

accepted in the next outline with the excepti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Ampliotrema, which is clearly shown to be<br />

nested within a m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic Ocellularia.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sequently, Ampliotrema is regarded a<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ym of Ocellularia. (2006-10-18)<br />

4446. Togninia Berl.<br />

The genus and its anamorph Phaeoacrem<strong>on</strong>ium<br />

is m<strong>on</strong>ographed by Mostert et al. (2006).<br />

Phylogenies of the SSU and LSU rDNA<br />

supported a placement of Togninia in<br />

Diaporthales. (2006-05-30)<br />

4738. Torpedospora Meyers<br />

See note 4662 under Hypocreomycetidae. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4447. Trematosphaeria Fuckel<br />

The generic c<strong>on</strong>cepts in this group of fungi are<br />

discussed by Tanaka et al. (2005), who point out<br />

that the genus appears morphologically<br />

heterogeneous. (2006-05-30)<br />

4611. Tribulatia J.E. Taylor, K.D. Hyde &<br />

E.B.G. J<strong>on</strong>es<br />

This new m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus was described for a<br />

tropical <strong>ascomycete</strong> growing <strong>on</strong> ferns (Taylor &<br />

Hyde 2003). It will be accepted in<br />

Phyllachoraceae in the next outline. (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

4562. Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascus H.S. Jacks<strong>on</strong>


Kurtzman (2004) c<strong>on</strong>firmed using LSU rDNA<br />

sequences that the genus bel<strong>on</strong>gs to<br />

Endomycetaceae where it was previously placed<br />

with a questi<strong>on</strong> mark. (2006-10-18)<br />

4739. Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascus H.S. Jacks<strong>on</strong><br />

See note 4740 under Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascaceae. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4740. Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascaceae Kurtzman &<br />

Robnett<br />

This new family is described (Kurtzman &<br />

Robnett 2007) to accommodate the genera<br />

Sugiyamaella, Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascus, Wickerhamiella,<br />

and Zygoascus. (2007-06-05)<br />

4470. Trichothelium Müll. Arg.<br />

See note under Porinaceae (4465). (2006-07-17)<br />

4471. Trimmatothele Zahlbr.<br />

The genus is shown to differ from Verrucaria<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly by multispored asci (Ertz & Diederich<br />

2004). Hence the genus is reduced to syn<strong>on</strong>ymy<br />

with Verrucaria. For the deviating T. antarctica<br />

a new genus Oevstedalia is described (see note<br />

above). (2006-07-17)<br />

4563. Trypetheliaceae Zenker<br />

Del Prado et al. (2006) studied the phylogenetic<br />

positi<strong>on</strong> of this family using nu LSU and mt SSU<br />

rDNA sequence data. They showed that the<br />

family does not bel<strong>on</strong>g to Pyrenulales as<br />

previously thought, but is a further lichenized<br />

member of Dothideomycetes in additi<strong>on</strong> to<br />

Arthopyreniaceae. M<strong>on</strong>ophyly of lichenized<br />

Dothideomycetes was significantly rejected,<br />

suggesting independent origin or loss of this<br />

nutriti<strong>on</strong>al mode within the class. The order will<br />

be placed in Dothideomycetes inc. sed. in the<br />

next outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4448. Tubeufiaceae M.E. Barr<br />

In a phylogenetic study using SSU and LSU<br />

rDNA (Tsui & Berbee 2006), the Tubeufiaceae<br />

s. str. formed a str<strong>on</strong>gly supported m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic<br />

group including five species of Tubeufia and<br />

87<br />

most species of the asexual genera Helicoma,<br />

Helicomyces, and Helicosporium. The asexual<br />

genera were not m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic and traditi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

morphological characters were more useful for<br />

species delimitati<strong>on</strong> than for higher level<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships. Tubeufia pezizula unexpectedly<br />

clustered with Capr<strong>on</strong>ia in the Chaetothyriales<br />

and misidentificati<strong>on</strong> or c<strong>on</strong>taminati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

culture were speculated. Helicodendr<strong>on</strong> and<br />

Helico<strong>on</strong> were polyphyletic with representatives<br />

occurring in different <strong>ascomycete</strong> orders. Other<br />

members traditi<strong>on</strong>ally placed in the Tubeufiaceae<br />

clustered in Pleosporales (Acanthostigmella<br />

brevispina and Letandraea helminthicola) or in<br />

Dothideomycetes (Tyrannosorus pinicola).<br />

(2006-05-30)<br />

4472. Tubeufiaceae M.E. Barr<br />

In a study using LSU rDNA, Kodsueb et al.<br />

(2006) found a str<strong>on</strong>gly supported m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic<br />

clade that corresp<strong>on</strong>ds to the family<br />

Tubeufiaceae and c<strong>on</strong>tains a number of species<br />

of Tubeufia and Helicomyces. Three other<br />

members traditi<strong>on</strong>ally placed in the family<br />

clustered elsewhere. Acanthostigma perpusillum<br />

(syn: Tubeufia clint<strong>on</strong>ii) clustered with Capr<strong>on</strong>ia<br />

(Chaetothyriales). (Interestingly, in another study<br />

(Tsui & Berbee 2006; see Note 4448) Tubeufia<br />

pezizula found its placement in that group as<br />

well.) Boerlagiomyces based <strong>on</strong> B. websteri (not<br />

the type species) groups with Rhytismatales. The<br />

type species B. velutinus is rather different<br />

morphologically than this species and should be<br />

used to determine the placement of the genus.<br />

Thaxteriella was represented by T. helicoma and<br />

T. amaz<strong>on</strong>ensis, both of which grouped with<br />

Tubeufia species in the Tubeufiaceae clade in<br />

this study. If the type species, Thaxteriella<br />

corticola is a lost species identical to T. pezizula<br />

as was stated by Petrak (1953; reported in Crane<br />

et al. 1998) then Thaxteriella bel<strong>on</strong>gs in the<br />

Chaetothyriales assuming the species used by<br />

Tsui & Berbee (2006) is correctly identified.<br />

Other putative members of the Tubeufiaceae<br />

were not included. (2006-07-17)<br />

4741. Tubeufiaceae M.E. Barr<br />

In the study by Schoch et al. (2007) the family<br />

had an uncertain positi<strong>on</strong> in Dothideomycetes.<br />

(2007-06-05)


4742. Tuckermannopsis Gyeln.<br />

Teuvo Ahti (Helsinki, in litt.): Since Linnaeus<br />

the scientific names commemorating pers<strong>on</strong>s<br />

with the surname ending –man are frequently<br />

latinized with –nn-, e.g., Tuckermannia,<br />

Tuckermannopsis, Sparrmannia, Burmannia.<br />

The are not to be treated as spelling errors<br />

correctable under the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Code of<br />

Botanical Nomenclature Art. 60.7. Ex. 15. Thus<br />

the name of the lichen genus Tuckermannopsis<br />

Gyeln. is to be retained and should not be<br />

changed to Tuckermanopsis, as suggested by<br />

some recent authors. However, the latter spelling<br />

would be acceptable if it were proposed by the<br />

author Gyelnik. Similarly, Triophthalmidium<br />

sect. Tuckermania is correct. The spelling of the<br />

name of the lichen genus Tuckermannopsis<br />

Gyeln. (Gyelnik 1933: 6) was corrected by<br />

Santess<strong>on</strong> et al. (2004: 337) to read<br />

“Tuckermanopsis”, and many authors have<br />

followed their acti<strong>on</strong>. An obvious reas<strong>on</strong> for the<br />

change was that the name was supposedly (not<br />

stated in the protologue!) intended to h<strong>on</strong>or the<br />

well-known American lichenologist and botanist<br />

Edward Tuckerman (1817-1886), who always<br />

spelled his named Tuckerman, not Tuckermann.<br />

However, I think that the spelling<br />

Tuckermannopsis must be retained, because the<br />

change is not allowed by the Art. 60.7 of the<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Code of Botanical Nomenclature<br />

(McNeill et al. 2006: 60). The use of -nn- is to be<br />

regarded as an intenti<strong>on</strong>al latinizati<strong>on</strong>, because<br />

many authors, including Linnaeus, have used<br />

double n in a similar way when coining new<br />

generic or other epithets from other pers<strong>on</strong>s’<br />

names. A search from the ING (Index Nominum<br />

Genericorum; Farr et al. 1979) brought many<br />

such cases, e.g., Burmannia(ceae) (from<br />

Burman), Sparrmannia (from Sparrman), and<br />

Chapmannia (from Chapman). They also include<br />

two vascular plant genera, Tuckermannia and<br />

Tuckermania, which are both acceptable<br />

spellings, but are to be treated as hom<strong>on</strong>yms,<br />

however (correctly treated in ING). It is probably<br />

due to the easier pr<strong>on</strong>unciati<strong>on</strong> (in some<br />

languages) that the extra n was added by some<br />

authors into the latinized forms. As to other<br />

lichen names, Gyelnik (1933: 6) also published<br />

Tuckermannopsis sect. Eutuckermannopsis<br />

Gyeln. (nom. inval. and illeg.) and sect.<br />

Pseudotuckermannopsis Gyeln., and further<br />

(Gyelnik 1933: 8) Triophthalmidium sect.<br />

Tuckermannia Gyeln. In these cases the spellings<br />

with double n’s are to be maintained as well.<br />

(2007-06-05)<br />

88<br />

4449. Tuckneraria Randlane & A. Thell<br />

This genus is reduced to syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with<br />

Nephromopsis by Thell et al. (2005), see note<br />

under Nephromopsis. (2006-05-30)<br />

4612. Uluguria Vezda<br />

This new m<strong>on</strong>otypic genus was introduced by<br />

Vezda (2004) for a foliicolous lichen formerly<br />

placed in Bacidia. However, according to<br />

Lücking (in press) the species bel<strong>on</strong>gs to<br />

Szczawinskia A. Funk and c<strong>on</strong>sequently, the<br />

genus is regarded as a syn<strong>on</strong>ym of Szczawinskia<br />

A. Funk in the next outline. (2006-12-20)<br />

4473. Usnea Dill. ex Adans<br />

Articus (2004) studied the phylogeny of usneoid<br />

genera and suggested to accept Neuropog<strong>on</strong> as<br />

an independent genus and to raise the subgenera<br />

in Usnea, Eumitria and Dolichousnea, to generic<br />

level. She further suggested that Usnea s.str. was<br />

heterogeneous, since Neuropog<strong>on</strong> was nested<br />

within a paraphyletic Usnea s.str. Wirtz et al.<br />

(2006) included additi<strong>on</strong>al taxa of Neuropog<strong>on</strong><br />

in their analyses and found Neuropog<strong>on</strong> to be<br />

polyphyletic with a core group that was the<br />

sister-group to secti<strong>on</strong> Usnea, while other<br />

Neuropog<strong>on</strong> species were basal to the secti<strong>on</strong><br />

Usnea clade or had unresolved relati<strong>on</strong>ships<br />

within subgenus Usnea. M<strong>on</strong>ophyly of<br />

Neuropog<strong>on</strong> was significantly rejected and hence<br />

Neuropog<strong>on</strong> reduced to syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with Usnea.<br />

The authors further suggested to c<strong>on</strong>tinue the<br />

traditi<strong>on</strong>al generic c<strong>on</strong>cept in Usnea, i.e.<br />

accepting Eumitria and Dolichousnea as<br />

subgenera within Usnea as proposed by Ohmura<br />

(2002). C<strong>on</strong>sequently, the genera Dolichousnea,<br />

Eumitria and Neuropog<strong>on</strong> will be included<br />

within Usnea in the next outline. (2006-07-17)<br />

4564. Vanderwaltozyma Kurtzman<br />

Two species are classified in this genus by<br />

Kurtzman (2003), which will be accepted in<br />

Saccharomycetaceae in the next outline. (2006-<br />

10-18)<br />

4743. Vittatispora P. Chaudhary, J. Campb.,<br />

D. Hawksw. & K.N. Sastry


Morphological and molecular data are presented<br />

by Chaudhary et al. (2007) to show that a fungus<br />

isolated from soil in India represents a new<br />

genus in Ceratostomataceae. Its morphology is<br />

somewhat intermediate between Melanospora<br />

and Sphaerodes. In the molecular phylogeny<br />

Vittatispora is basal to these two genera. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

46<strong>13</strong>. Wettsteinina Höhn.<br />

See note under Pleosporaceae (4<strong>59</strong>8). (2006-12-<br />

20)<br />

4744. Wickerhamiella S<strong>on</strong>eda<br />

See note 4740 under Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascaceae. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4745. Xanthoanaptychia S. K<strong>on</strong>dratyuk &<br />

Kärnefelt<br />

See note 4735. (2007-06-05)<br />

4614. Xanthomaculina Hale<br />

See note under Xanthoparmelia (4615). (2006-<br />

12-20)<br />

4474. Xanthoparmelia (Vain.) Hale<br />

Blanco et al. (2004) studied the phylogeny of<br />

parmelioid lichens c<strong>on</strong>taining Xanthoparmeliatype<br />

lichenan as cell wall polysaccharide to<br />

provide a basis for a revised generic c<strong>on</strong>cept in<br />

this group. Nuclear ITS and LSU rDNA and<br />

mitoch<strong>on</strong>drial SSU rDNA sequences were used<br />

infer phylogenies. Segregate genera suggested<br />

earlier did not form m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic groups.<br />

Neofuscelia was polyphyletic and nested within<br />

Xanthoparmelia and hence reduced to syn<strong>on</strong>ymy<br />

with the latter. Karoowia is polyphyletic, but<br />

since the type species was not included ad<br />

interim accepted as a separate genus. The<br />

syn<strong>on</strong>ymy of Ch<strong>on</strong>dropsis and Paraparmelia<br />

under Xanthoparmelia was already proposed<br />

earlier. (2006-07-17)<br />

4615. Xanthoparmelia (Vain.) Hale<br />

Thell et al. (2006) used ITS sequences to study<br />

the phylogeny of Xanthoparmelia and related<br />

89<br />

genera. The segregate genera Almbornia Essl.,<br />

Namakwa Hale, and Xanthomaculina Hale<br />

nested within Xanthoparmelia. Hence these three<br />

genera were reduced to syn<strong>on</strong>ymy with<br />

Xanthoparmelia, which will be followed in the<br />

next outline. (2006-12-20)<br />

4746. Xyleborus R.C. Harris & Ladd<br />

This is another crustose genus in the family<br />

Stereocaulaceae (Harris & Ladd 2007). It occurs<br />

<strong>on</strong> weathered lignum in eastern North America.<br />

It is similar to Hertelidea, but differs in exciple<br />

structure. (2007-06-05)<br />

4565. Xylomelasma Réblová<br />

This genus is described by Réblová (2006) for<br />

two species morphologically distinct from<br />

Ceratostomella. In analyses using data from SSU<br />

and LSU the genus is separate from<br />

Ceratostomella but also lies within the<br />

Sordariomycetidae inc. sed. (2006-10-18)<br />

4747. Xylotumulus J.D. Rogers, Y.M. Ju &<br />

Hemmes<br />

Rogers et al. (2006) described this new genus in<br />

Xylariaceae for a single species occurring <strong>on</strong><br />

wood in Hawaii. It differs from the similar<br />

Amphirosellinia in having a n<strong>on</strong>-amyloid ring in<br />

the ascus apex, a variable number of ascospores<br />

per ascus and sporodichial c<strong>on</strong>idiomata. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4748. Yamadazyma Bill<strong>on</strong>-Grand<br />

See note 4718 under Saccharomycetes. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4566. Zopfiaceae G. Arnaud ex D. Hawksw.<br />

This family is currently placed in<br />

Dotideomycetes/Chaetothyriomycetes inc. sed.,<br />

but Kruys et al. (2006) dem<strong>on</strong>strated it bel<strong>on</strong>gs<br />

to Pleosporales, where it will be listed in the next<br />

outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

4475. Zopfiella G. Winter<br />

Cai et al. (2006b) in a phylogenetic study using<br />

partial LSU, ITS, and partial beta-tubulin, found


that Zopfiella is polyphyletic. The type species<br />

formed a well-supported group with a species<br />

each of Podospora and Cercophora. The group<br />

shared the characteristic of ascospores with a<br />

septum in the dark cell and suggested that<br />

Zopfiella be restricted to species having that<br />

character. However, Cai et al. (2006b) did not<br />

menti<strong>on</strong> that the same character shows up in<br />

some distantly related taxa included in their<br />

analyses. The type species of Zopfiella did not<br />

group with the representatives of the<br />

Chaetomiaceae so the genus returns to the<br />

Lasiosphaeriaceae. (2006-07-17)<br />

4749. Zygoascus M. Th. Smith<br />

See note 4740 under Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascaceae. (2007-<br />

06-05)<br />

4567. Zygotorulaspora Kurtzman<br />

A well supported clade including two species is<br />

accepted at generic level by Kurtzman (2003),<br />

which will be accepted in Saccharomycetaceae<br />

in the next outline. (2006-10-18)<br />

<strong>4750.</strong> Zygozyma Van der Walt & Arx<br />

See note 4677. (2007-06-05)<br />

Alstrup, V. & Hansen, E.S. 2001. New lichens<br />

and lichenicolous fungi from Greenland. –<br />

Graphis Scripta 12: 41-50.<br />

Aptroot, A. 2004. Two new <strong>ascomycete</strong>s with<br />

l<strong>on</strong>g gelatinous appendages collected from<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ocots in the tropics. – Stud. Mycol. 50:<br />

307-311.<br />

Aptroot, A. 2007. Davidgallowaya cornutispora,<br />

an enigmatic lichen from New Guinea. –<br />

Bibl. Lichenol. 95: <strong>13</strong>7-145.<br />

Aptroot, A., Umana, L., Chaves, J.L. & Trest,<br />

M.T. 2006. A first assessment of the<br />

Ticolichen biodiversity inventory in Costa<br />

Rica: three new squamulose genera<br />

(Lecanorales: Ramalinaceae and<br />

Pilocarpaceae). – J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 100:<br />

617-623.<br />

Articus, K. 2004. Neuropog<strong>on</strong> and the<br />

phylogeny of Usnea s.l. (Parmeliaceae,<br />

Lichenized Ascomycetes). – Tax<strong>on</strong> 53: 925-<br />

934.<br />

90<br />

Baloch, E. & Grube, M. 2006. Evoluti<strong>on</strong> and<br />

phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships within Porinaceae<br />

(Ostropomycetidae), focusing <strong>on</strong> foliicolous<br />

species. – Mycol. Res. 110: 125-<strong>13</strong>6.<br />

Baral, H.O. 1999. A m<strong>on</strong>ograph of<br />

Helicog<strong>on</strong>ium (=Myriog<strong>on</strong>ium, Leotiales), a<br />

group of n<strong>on</strong>-ascocarpous intrahymenial<br />

mycoparasites. – Nova Hedwgia 69: 1-71.<br />

Blanco, O., Crespo, A., Elix, J.A., Hawksworth,<br />

D.L. & Lumbsch, H.T. 2004. A new<br />

classificati<strong>on</strong> of parmelioid lichens<br />

c<strong>on</strong>taining Xanthoparmelia-type lichenan<br />

(Ascomycota: Lecanorales) based <strong>on</strong><br />

morphological and molecular evidence. -<br />

Tax<strong>on</strong> 53: 9<strong>59</strong>-975.<br />

Blanco, O., Crespo, A., Divakar, P.K., Elix, J.A.<br />

& Lumbsch, H.T. 2005. Molecular<br />

phylogeny of parmotremoid lichens<br />

(Ascomycotina, Parmeliaceae). – Mycologia<br />

97: 150-1<strong>59</strong>.<br />

Buck, W.R 1998: Lichen flora of eastern North<br />

America: the genus Gomphillus<br />

(Gomphillaceae). - In: Glenn, M.G., Harris,<br />

R.C., Dirig, R. & Cole, M.S. (eds.):<br />

Lichenographia Thoms<strong>on</strong>iana: North<br />

American Lichenology in H<strong>on</strong>or of John W.<br />

Thoms<strong>on</strong>. Mycotax<strong>on</strong> Ltd., Ithaca, New<br />

York, pp. 71-76.<br />

Buschbom, J. & Mueller, G. 2004. Resolving<br />

evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary relati<strong>on</strong>ships in the lichenforming<br />

genus Porpidia and related allies<br />

(Porpidiaceae, Ascomycota). – Mol.<br />

Phylogen. Evol. 32: 66-82.<br />

Cai, L., Zhang, K.Q., & Hyde, K.D. 2005.<br />

Ascoyunnania aquatica gen. et sp nov., a<br />

freshwater fungus collected from China and<br />

its microcylic c<strong>on</strong>idiati<strong>on</strong>. - Fungal<br />

Diversity 18: 1-8.<br />

Cai, L., Jeew<strong>on</strong>, R. & Hyde, K. 2005a.<br />

Phylogenetic evaluati<strong>on</strong> and tax<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

revisi<strong>on</strong> of Schizothecium based <strong>on</strong><br />

ribosomal DNA and protein coding genes. -<br />

Fungal Diversity 19: 1-21.<br />

Cai, L., Jeew<strong>on</strong>, R. & Hyde, K.D. 2006.<br />

Phylogenetic investigati<strong>on</strong>s of Sordariaceae<br />

based <strong>on</strong> multiple gene sequences and<br />

morphology. – Mycol. Res. 110: <strong>13</strong>7-150.<br />

Cai, L., Jeew<strong>on</strong>, R. & Hyde, K.D. 2006b.<br />

Molecular <strong>systematics</strong> of Zopfiella and<br />

allied genera: evidence from multi-gene


sequence analyses. – Mycol. Res. 110: 3<strong>59</strong>-<br />

368.<br />

Cann<strong>on</strong>, P.F. & Evans, H.C. 1999. Biotrophic<br />

species of Phyllachoraceae associated with<br />

the angiosperm family Erythroxylaceae. –<br />

Mycol. Res. 103: 577-<strong>59</strong>0.<br />

Carmaran, C.C., Romero, A.I. & Giussani, L.M.<br />

2007. An approach towards a new<br />

phylogenetic classificati<strong>on</strong> in Diatrypaceae.<br />

– Fung. Diversity 23: 67-87.<br />

Chamberlain, H.L., Rossman, A.Y, Stewart,<br />

E.L., Ulvinen, T. & Samuels, G.J. 2004. The<br />

stipitate species of Hypocrea (Hypocreales,<br />

Hypocreaceae) including Podostroma. –<br />

Karstenia 44: 1-24.<br />

Chaudhary, P., Campbell, J., Hawksworth, D.L.<br />

& Sastry, K.N. 2007. Vittatispora, a new<br />

melanosporous genus from Indian soil. –<br />

Mycologia 98: 460-467.<br />

Chaverri, P., Bischoff, J.F., Evans, H.C. &<br />

Hodge, K.T. 2006. Regiocrella, a new<br />

entomopathogenic genus with a pycnidial<br />

anamorph and its phylogenetic placement in<br />

the Clavicipitaceae. – Mycologia 97: 1225-<br />

1237.<br />

Coppins, B.J. & Fryday, A.M. 2006. New or<br />

previously misunderstood species of<br />

Lithographa and Rimularia (Agyriaceae)<br />

from the southern subpolar regi<strong>on</strong> and<br />

western Canada. – Lichenologist 38: 93-107.<br />

Crewe, A.T., Purvis, O.W. & Wedin, M. 2006.<br />

Molecular phylogeny of Acarosporaceae<br />

(Ascomycota) with focus <strong>on</strong> the proposed<br />

genus Polysporinopsis. – Mycol. Res. 110:<br />

521-526.<br />

Crous, P., Denman, S., Taylor, J.E., Swart, L. &<br />

Palm, M.E. 2004. Cultivati<strong>on</strong> and diseases<br />

of Proteaceae: Leucadendr<strong>on</strong>,<br />

Leucospermum and Protea. CBS<br />

Biodiversity Series 2. Baarn.<br />

Crous, P., Slippers, B., Wingfield, M.J.,<br />

Rheeder, J., Marasas, W.F.O., Philips,<br />

A.J.L., Alves, A., Burgess, T., Barber, P. &<br />

Groenewald, J.Z. 2006. Phylogenetic<br />

lineages in the Botryosphaeriaceae. – Stud.<br />

Mycol. 55: 235-253.<br />

Del Prado, R., Schmitt, I., Kautz, S., Palice, Z.,<br />

Lücking, R. & Lumbsch, H.T. 2006.<br />

Molecular data place Trypetheliaceae in<br />

91<br />

Dothideomycetes. – Mycol. Res. 110: 242-<br />

249.<br />

Divakar, P.K. & Upreti, D.K. 2004. Parmelioid<br />

lichens in India (A Revisi<strong>on</strong>ary Study).<br />

Bishen Singh, Dehra Dun.<br />

Döbbeler, P. 2003. Ascomycetes <strong>on</strong><br />

Dendroligotrichum (Musci). – Nova<br />

Hedwigia 76: 1-44.<br />

Döbbeler P. & Triebel D. 2000. Potridiscus<br />

polymorphus (Leotiales) – a new<br />

<strong>ascomycete</strong> <strong>on</strong> Polytrichaceae (Musci) with<br />

palaeoaustral distributi<strong>on</strong>. - Hoppea 61: 71-<br />

83.<br />

Ekman, S. & Tønsberg, T. 2002. Most species of<br />

Lepraria and Leproloma form a<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic group closely related to<br />

Stereocaul<strong>on</strong>. – Mycol. Research 106: 1262-<br />

1276.<br />

Elix, J.A. 1994. Bulbothrix. – Flora of Australia<br />

55: <strong>13</strong>-19.<br />

Ertz, D., & Diederich, P. 2004. Revisi<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Trimmatothele (Verrucariaceae), and<br />

descripti<strong>on</strong> of Oevstedalia for<br />

Trimmatotheliopsis antarctica, a new lichen<br />

genus with true ascoc<strong>on</strong>idia. – Mycol.<br />

Progress 3: 229-236.<br />

Ertz, D. & Diederich, P. 2006. Gelatinopsis<br />

leptogii (Helotiales, Ascomycota), a new<br />

lichenicolous fungus <strong>on</strong> Leptogium<br />

byssinum from Belgium and Germany. –<br />

Lichenologist 38: 515-518.<br />

Ertz, D. & Diederich, P. 2007. Revisi<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

Opegrapha species with muriform<br />

ascospores (previously Dictyographa)<br />

(lichenized Roccellaceae). – Lichenologist<br />

39: 143-151.<br />

Ertz, D., Christnach, C., Wedin, M. & Diederich,<br />

P. 2005. A world m<strong>on</strong>ograph of the genus<br />

Plectocarp<strong>on</strong> (Roccellaceae, Arth<strong>on</strong>iales). –<br />

Bibl. Lichenol. 91: 1-155.<br />

Farr, E.R., Leussink, J.A. & Stafleu, F. A. (eds.)<br />

1979. Index Nominum Genericorum<br />

(Plantarum). Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema.<br />

Utrecht; W. Junk, The Hague.<br />

Fernández, F.A. & Huhndorf, S.M. 2005. New<br />

species of Chaetosphaeria, Melanopsamella<br />

and Tainosphaeria gen. nov. from the<br />

Americas. – Fungal Diversity 18: 15-57.


Fernández, F., Miller, A.N., Huhndorf, S.M.,<br />

Lutz<strong>on</strong>i, F.M. & Zoller, S. 2006.<br />

Systematics of the genus Chaetosphaeria<br />

and its allied genera: morphological and<br />

phylogenetic diversity in north temperate<br />

and Neotropical taxa. – Mycologia 98: 121-<br />

<strong>13</strong>0.<br />

Follmann, G. 2006. Two new roccelloid<br />

Physciaceae from pacific South America<br />

and a synopsis of the genus Santess<strong>on</strong>ia. – J.<br />

Hattori Bot. Lab. 100: 651-670.<br />

Frisch, A. 2006. C<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s towards a new<br />

<strong>systematics</strong> of the lichen family<br />

Thelotremataceae. I. The lichen family<br />

Thelotremataceae in Africa. – Bibl.<br />

Lichenol. 92: 3-370.<br />

Frisch, A. & Kalb, K. 2006. C<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

towards a new <strong>systematics</strong> of the lichen<br />

family Thelotremataceae. II. A m<strong>on</strong>ograph<br />

of Thelotremataceae with a complex<br />

structure of the columella. – Bibl. Lichenol.<br />

92: 371-516.<br />

Frisch, A., Kalb, K. & Grube, M. 2006.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s towards a new <strong>systematics</strong> of<br />

the lichen family Thelotremataceae. III.<br />

Molecular phylogeny of the<br />

Thelotremataceae. – Bibl. Lichenol. 92: 517-<br />

539.<br />

Fryar, S.C. & Hyde, K.D. 2004. New species and<br />

genera of <strong>ascomycete</strong>s from fresh and<br />

brackish water in Brunei: Ayria<br />

appendiculata and Sungaiicola<br />

bactrodesmiella gen. et spp. nov.,<br />

Fluviatispora boothii, Torrentispora<br />

crassiparietis and T. fusiformis spp. nov. –<br />

Crypt. Mycol. 25: 245-260.<br />

Galloway, D.J., Hafellner, J. & Elix, J.A. 2005.<br />

Stirt<strong>on</strong>iella, a new genus for Catillaria<br />

kelica (Lecanorales: Ramalinaceae). -<br />

Lichenologist 37: 261-271.<br />

Gao, J. & Hou, C.-L. 2006. A new species of<br />

Neococcomyces (Rhytismatales,<br />

Ascomycota) from China. – Nova Hedwigia<br />

82: 123-126.<br />

Garcia, D., Stchigel, A.M., Cano, J., Guarro, J.,<br />

& Hawksworth, D.L. 2004. A synopsis and<br />

re-circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of Neurospora (syn.<br />

Gelasinospora) based <strong>on</strong> ultrstructural and<br />

28S rDNA sequence data. – Mycol. Res.<br />

108: 1119-1142.<br />

92<br />

Gareth J<strong>on</strong>es, E.B., Chatmala, I. & Pang, K.-L.<br />

2006. Two new genera isolated from marine<br />

habitats in Thailand: Pseudolignincola and<br />

Thalespora (Halosphaeriales, Ascomycota).<br />

– Nova Hedwigia 83: 219-232.<br />

Gawande, S.J. & Agarwal, D.K. 2004.<br />

Sivanesaniella – a new ascomycetous genus<br />

from India. – Indian Phytopath. 57: 231-232.<br />

Geiser, D.M., Gueidan, C., Miadlikowska, J.,<br />

Lutz<strong>on</strong>i, F., Kauff, F., Hofstetter, V., Fraker,<br />

E., Schoch, C.L., Tibell, L., Untereiner,<br />

W.A. & Aptroot, A. 2007 (“2006”).<br />

Eurotiomycetes: Eurotiomycetidae and<br />

Chaetothyriomycetidae. – Mycologia 98:<br />

1053-1064.<br />

Greif, M.D. & Currah, R.S. 2007. Development<br />

and dehiscence of the cephalothecioid<br />

peridium in Aporothielavia leptoderma<br />

shows it bel<strong>on</strong>gs in Chaetomidium. – Mycol.<br />

Research 111: 70-77.<br />

Grube, M. 2005. Frigidopyrenia – a new genus<br />

for a peculiar subarctic lichen, with notes <strong>on</strong><br />

similar taxa. – Phyt<strong>on</strong> 45: 305-318.<br />

Grube, M. & Kantvilas, G. 2006. Siphula<br />

represents a remarkable case of<br />

morphological c<strong>on</strong>vergence in sterile<br />

lichens. – Lichenologist 38: 241-249.<br />

Gryzenhout, M., Glen, H.F., Wingfield, B.D. &<br />

Wingfield, M.J. 2005. Amphilogia gen. nov.<br />

for Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectria-like fungi from<br />

Elaeocarpus spp. in New Zealand and Sri<br />

Lanka. – Tax<strong>on</strong> 54: 1009-1021.<br />

Gryzenhout, M., Glen, H.F., Wingfield, B.D. &<br />

Wingfield, M.J. 2005a. Proposal to c<strong>on</strong>serve<br />

the name Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectria (Diaporthales) with<br />

a c<strong>on</strong>served type. – Tax<strong>on</strong> 54: 539-540.<br />

Gryzenhout, M., Myburg, H., Wingfield, B.D. &<br />

Wingfield, M.J. 2006. Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae<br />

(Diaporthales), a new family including<br />

Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectria, Chrysoporthe, Endothia and<br />

allied genera. – Mycologia 98: 239-249.<br />

Gryzenhout, M., Myburg, H., Hodges, C.S.,<br />

Wingfield, B.D. & Wingfield, M.J. 2006a.<br />

Microthia, Holocryphia and Ursicollum,<br />

three new genera <strong>on</strong> Eucalyptus and<br />

Coccoloba for fungi previously known as<br />

Cryph<strong>on</strong>ectria. – Stud. Mycol. 55: 35-52.<br />

Gyelnik, V. 1933. Lichenes varii novi criticique.<br />

- Acta Fauna Fl. Universali, ser. 2, Bot. 1(5-<br />

6): 3-10.


Hafellner, J. & Kalb, K. 1995. Studies in<br />

Trichotheliales ordo novus. – Bibl. Lichenol.<br />

57: 161-186.<br />

Hale, M.E. 1980. Generic delimitati<strong>on</strong> in the<br />

lichen family Thelotremataceae. –<br />

Mycotax<strong>on</strong> 11: <strong>13</strong>0-<strong>13</strong>8.<br />

Hammer, S. 2003. Notoclad<strong>on</strong>ia, a new genus in<br />

the Clad<strong>on</strong>iaceae. – Bryologist 106: 162-<br />

167.<br />

Hansen, K. & Pfister, D.H. 2007 (“2006”).<br />

Systematics of the Pezizomycetes – the<br />

operculate discomycetes. – Mycologia 98:<br />

1029-1040.<br />

Hansen, K., Perry, B.A. & Pfister, D.H.<br />

2005.Phylogenetic origins of two<br />

cleistothecial fungi, Orbicula parietina and<br />

Lasiobolidium orbiculoides, within the<br />

operculate discomycetes. – Mycologia 97:<br />

1023-1033.<br />

Harris, R.C. 1995. More Florida Lichens.<br />

Including the 10 cent Tour of the<br />

Pyrenolichens. - Publ. by the Author, Br<strong>on</strong>x,<br />

N.Y.<br />

Harris, R.C. & Ladd, D. 2007. New taxa of<br />

lichens and lichenicolous fungi from the<br />

Ozark Ecoregi<strong>on</strong>. – Opuscula Philolichenum<br />

4: 57-68.<br />

Hawksworth, D.L. 2006. Misunderstanding the<br />

status of Ciffer & Tomaselli’s generic<br />

names necessitates Peterjamesia gen. nov.<br />

for Sclerophyt<strong>on</strong> circumscriptum and an<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>al species. - Lichenologist 38: 187-<br />

190.<br />

Hawksworth, D.L. & Crespo, A. 2002. Proposal<br />

to c<strong>on</strong>serve the name Xanthoparmelia<br />

against Ch<strong>on</strong>dropsis nom. c<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

(Parmeliaceae). – Tax<strong>on</strong> 51: 807.<br />

Hawksworth, D.L. & Halici, M.G. 2007.<br />

Gemmaspora, a new verrucarialean genus<br />

with remarkable ascospores for Adelococcus<br />

lecanorae growing <strong>on</strong> Aspicilia species in<br />

Syria and Turkey. – Lichenologist 39: 121-<br />

128.<br />

Helms, G., Friedl, T. & Rambold, G. 2003.<br />

Phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships of the<br />

Physciaceae inferred from rDNA sequence<br />

data and selected phenotypic characters. -<br />

Mycologia 95: 1078-1099.<br />

Hsieh, H.M., Ju, Y.-M. & Rogers, J.D. 2005.<br />

Molecular phylogeny of Hypoxyl<strong>on</strong> and<br />

93<br />

closely related genera. – Mycologia 97: 844-<br />

865.<br />

Högnabba, F. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of the<br />

genus Stereocaul<strong>on</strong> (Stereocaulaceae,<br />

lichenized <strong>ascomycete</strong>s). – Mycol. Res. 110:<br />

1080-1092.<br />

Huhndorf, S.M. & Fernández, F.A. 2005.<br />

Teleomorph-anamorph c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

Chaetosphaeria raciborskii and related<br />

species, and their Craspedodidymum-like<br />

anamorphs. – Fungal Div. 19: 23-49.<br />

Huhndorf, S.M., Miller, A.N., & Fernández, F.A.<br />

2004. Molecular <strong>systematics</strong> of the order<br />

Sordariales: the order and the family<br />

Lasiosphaeriaceae redefined. – Mycologia<br />

96: 368-387.<br />

Huhndorf, S.M., Miller, A.N., Fernández, F.A. &<br />

Lodge, D.J. 2005. Neotropical <strong>ascomycete</strong>s<br />

<strong>13</strong>. Cornipulvina and Erythromada, two<br />

new genera from the Carribean and<br />

elsewhere. – Fungal Div. 20: <strong>59</strong>-69.<br />

Hyde, K.D. & Fröhlich, J. 2003. Nigramammilla<br />

[sic!] calami gen. et sp. nov. and<br />

Arecomyces calami, A. liculae and<br />

Pseudohal<strong>on</strong>ectria palmae spp. Nov. from<br />

palms. – Crypt. Mycol. 24: <strong>13</strong>-20.<br />

Inderbitzin, P., Shoemaker, R.A., O´Neill, N.R.,<br />

Turge<strong>on</strong>, B.G. & Berbee, M.L. 2006.<br />

Systematics and mating systems of two<br />

fungal pathogens of opium poppy: the<br />

heterothallic Crivellia papaveracea with a<br />

Brachycladium penicillatum asexual state<br />

and a homothallic species with a<br />

Brachycladium papaveris asexual state. –<br />

Can. J. Bot. 84: <strong>13</strong>04-<strong>13</strong>26.<br />

Jiang, Y. & Yao, Y.-J. 2005. ITS sequence<br />

analysis and ascomatal development of<br />

Pseudogymnoascus roseus. – Mycotax<strong>on</strong><br />

94: 55-73.<br />

Kalb, K. 2004. New or otherwise interesting<br />

lichens II. – Bibl. Lichenol. 88: 301-329.<br />

Kalb, K. 2007. New or otherwise interesting<br />

lichens. III. – Bibl. Lichenol. 95: 297-316.<br />

Kantvilas, G. 2000. Additi<strong>on</strong>s from the Southern<br />

Hemisphere to the lichen genus Loxospora. -<br />

Herzogia 14: 35-38.<br />

Kantvilas, G. 2004. Sarrameanaceae. - Flora of<br />

Australia 56A: 74-77.


Kärnefelt, I. & Thell, A. 1992. The evaluati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

characters in lichenized families,<br />

exemplified with the alectoroid and some<br />

parmelioid genera. – Pl. Syst. Evol. 180:<br />

181-204.<br />

Kauff, F. & Lutz<strong>on</strong>i, F. 2002. Phylogeny of the<br />

Gyalectales and Ostropales (Ascomycota,<br />

Fungi): am<strong>on</strong>g and within order<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships. – Mol. Phylogen. Evol. 25:<br />

<strong>13</strong>8-156.<br />

Kauff, F. & Büdel, B. 2005. Ascoma <strong>on</strong>togeny<br />

and apothecial anatomy in the Gyalectaceae<br />

(Ostropales, Ascomycota) support the reestablishment<br />

of the Coenog<strong>on</strong>iaceae. -<br />

Bryologist 108: 272-281.<br />

Kodsueb, R., Dhanasekaran, V., Aptroot, A.,<br />

Lumy<strong>on</strong>g, S., McKenzie, E.H.C., Hyde,<br />

K.D. & Jeew<strong>on</strong>, R. 2006. The family<br />

Pleosporaceae: intergeneric relati<strong>on</strong>ships<br />

and phylogenetic perspectives based <strong>on</strong><br />

sequence analyses of partial 28S rDNA. –<br />

Mycologia 98: 571-583.<br />

Kodsueb, R., Jeew<strong>on</strong>, R., Vijaykrishna, D.,<br />

McKenzie, E.H.C., Lumy<strong>on</strong>g, P., Lumy<strong>on</strong>g,<br />

S. & Hyde, K.D. 2006. Systematic studies of<br />

Tubeufiaceae based <strong>on</strong> morphological and<br />

molecular data. – Fungal Div. 21: 105-<strong>13</strong>0.<br />

Kohlmeyer, J. & Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, B.<br />

1996. Fungi <strong>on</strong> Juncus roemerianus. 6.<br />

Glomerobolus gen. nov., the first ballistic<br />

member of Ag<strong>on</strong>omycetales. – Mycologia<br />

88: 328-337.<br />

Kruys, Å., Erikss<strong>on</strong>, O.E. & Wedin, M. 2006.<br />

Phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships of coprophilous<br />

Pleosporales (Dothideomycetes,<br />

Ascomycota), and the classificati<strong>on</strong> of some<br />

bitunicate taxa of unknown positi<strong>on</strong>. –<br />

Mycol. Res. 110: 527-536.<br />

Kurtzman, C.P. 2003. Phylogenetic<br />

circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of Saccharomyces,<br />

Kluyveromyces and other members of the<br />

Saccharomycetaceae, and the proposal of the<br />

new genera Lachancea, Nakaseomyces,<br />

Naumovia, Vanderwaltozyma and<br />

Zygotorulaspora. – FEMS Yeast Res. 4:<br />

233-245.<br />

Kurtzman, C.P. 2004. Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascus<br />

petasosporus sp. nov. and Sympodiomyces<br />

indianaensis sp. nov., two new members of<br />

Saccharomycetales. – Ant<strong>on</strong>ie van<br />

Leeuwenhoek 85: 297-304.<br />

94<br />

Kurtzman, C.P. 2005. Descripti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Komagatella phaffii sp. nov. and the transfer<br />

of Pichia pseudopastoris to the<br />

methylotrophic yeast genus Komagatella. –<br />

Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55: 973-976.<br />

Kurtzman, C.P. 2005. New species and a new<br />

combinati<strong>on</strong> in the Hyphopichia and<br />

Yarrowia yeast clades. – Ant<strong>on</strong>ie van<br />

Leeuwenhoek 88: 121-<strong>13</strong>0.<br />

Kurtzman, C.P. 2006. New species and new<br />

combinati<strong>on</strong>s in the yeast genera<br />

Kregervanrija gen. nov., Saturnispora and<br />

Candida. - FEMS Yeast Res. 6: 288-297.<br />

Kurtzman, C.P. & Robnett, C.J. 2003.<br />

Phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships am<strong>on</strong>g yeasts of<br />

the 'Saccharomyces complex' determined<br />

from multigene sequence analyses. - FEMS<br />

Yeast Res. 3: 417-432.<br />

Kurtzman, C.P. & Robnett, C.J. 2007. Multigene<br />

phylogenetic analysis of the<br />

Trichom<strong>on</strong>ascus, Wickerhamiella and<br />

Zygoascus yeast clades, and the proposal of<br />

Sugiyamaella gen. nov. and 14 new species<br />

combinati<strong>on</strong>s. - FEMS Yeast Res. 7: 141-<br />

151.<br />

Kurtzman, C.P., Albertyn, J. & Basehoar-<br />

Powers, E. 2007. Multigene phylogenetic<br />

analysis of the Lipomycetaceae and the<br />

proposed transfer of Zygozyma species to<br />

Lipomyces and Babjevia anomala to<br />

Dipodascopsis. – FEMS Yeast Res. Xx: 1-8.<br />

Kurtzman, C.P., Robnett, C.J., Ward, J.M.,<br />

Brayt<strong>on</strong>, C., Gorelick, P. & Walsh, T.J.<br />

2005. Multigene phylogenetic analysis of<br />

pathogenic Candida species in the<br />

Kazachstania (Arxiozyma) telluris complex<br />

and descripti<strong>on</strong> of their ascosporic states as<br />

Kazachstania bovina sp. nov., K.<br />

heterogenica sp. nov., K. pintolopesii sp.<br />

nov., and K. slooffiae sp. nov. – J. Clin.<br />

Microbiol. 43: 101-111.<br />

Landvik, S., Egger, K. & Schuhmacher, T. 1997.<br />

Toward a subordinal classificati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />

Pezizales (Ascomycota): phylogenetic<br />

analyses SSU rDNA sequences. – Nord. J.<br />

Bot. 17: 403-418.<br />

Lin, Y.-R., Li, Z.-Z., Xiang, C.-T., Liang, S.-W.<br />

& Yu, S.-M. 1999. A new genus of<br />

Discomycetes, Neococcomyces gen. nov. –<br />

Mycosystema 18: 357-350.


Lopandic, K., Molnár, O., Suzuki, M., Pinsker,<br />

W. & Prillinger, H. 2005. Estimati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships within the<br />

Ascomycota <strong>on</strong> the basis of 18S rDNA<br />

sequences and chemotax<strong>on</strong>omy. – Mycol.<br />

Progr. 4: 205-214.<br />

Lücking, R. 1999. Ergänzungen und<br />

Verbesserungen zur Kenntnis der foliikolen<br />

Flechtenflora Costa Ricas. Die Familie<br />

Ectolechiaceae. – Phyt<strong>on</strong> (Horn) 39: <strong>13</strong>1-<br />

165.<br />

Lücking, R. & Kalb, K. 2000. Foliikole Flechten<br />

aus Brasilien (vornehmlich Amaz<strong>on</strong>ien),<br />

inklusive einer Checkliste und Bemerkungen<br />

zu Coenog<strong>on</strong>ium und Dimerella<br />

(Gyalectaceae). – Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 122: 1-<br />

61.<br />

Lücking, R., Buck, W.R., Sérusiaux, E. &<br />

Ferraro, L.I. 2005. Gomphillus caribaeus<br />

bel<strong>on</strong>gs in the new genus Brypogomphus<br />

(Lecanorales: Pilocarpaceae). – Bryologist<br />

108: 481-486.<br />

Lücking, R., Sipman, H.J.M., Umana, L.,<br />

Chaves, J.L. & Lumbsch, H.T. 2007.<br />

Aptrootia (Dothideomycetes:<br />

Trypetheliaceae), a new genus of<br />

pyrenocarpous lichens for Thelenella<br />

terricola. – Lichenologist 39: 187-193.<br />

Lumbsch, H.T. 1997. Bulbothricella<br />

amaz<strong>on</strong>ensis is a polysporous member of<br />

Bulbothrix (Parmeliaceae). - Mycotax<strong>on</strong> 64:<br />

225-228.<br />

Lumbsch, H.T., Schmitt, I., Palice, Z., Wiklund,<br />

E., Ekman, S. & Wedin, M. 2005.<br />

Supraordinal phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships of<br />

lichen-forming discomycetes<br />

(Lecanoromycetes) based <strong>on</strong> a combined<br />

Bayesian analysis of nuclear and<br />

mitoch<strong>on</strong>drial sequences. - Mol. Phylogen.<br />

Evol. 31: 822-832.<br />

Lutz<strong>on</strong>i, F., F. Kauff, C.J. Cox, D. McLaughlin,<br />

G. Celio, B. Dentinger, M. Padamsee, D.<br />

Hibbett, T.Y. James, E. Baloch, M. Grube,<br />

V. Reeb, V. Hofstetter, C. Schoch, A. E.<br />

Arnold, J. Miadlikowska, J. Spatafora, D.<br />

Johns<strong>on</strong>, S. Hamblet<strong>on</strong>, M. Crockett, R.<br />

Shoemaker, G-H. Sung, R. Lücking, H.T.<br />

Lumbsch, K. O’D<strong>on</strong>nell, M. Binder, P.<br />

Diederich, D. Ertz, C. Gueidan, B. Hall, K.<br />

Hansen, R. C. Harris, K. Hosaka, Y-W. Lim,<br />

Y. Liu, B. Matheny, H. Nishida, D. Pfister,<br />

J. Rogers, A. Rossman, I. Schmitt, H.<br />

95<br />

Sipman, J. St<strong>on</strong>e, J. Sugiyama, R. Yahr & R.<br />

Vilgalys. 2004. Where are we in assembling<br />

the fungal tree of life, classifying the fungi,<br />

and understanding the evoluti<strong>on</strong> of their<br />

subcellular traits. - Am. J. Bot. 91: 1446-<br />

1480.<br />

Matsushima, T. 2001 (2003). Matsushima<br />

Mycological Memoirs 10: 1-214. (Originally<br />

published <strong>on</strong> CD-ROM in PDF format Oct.<br />

2001; effectively published 10 Feb. 2003<br />

through distributi<strong>on</strong> of two hard-copies.)<br />

Mattss<strong>on</strong>, J.-E. & Wedin, M. 1999. A reassessment<br />

of the family Alectoriaceae. –<br />

Lichenologist 31: 431-440.<br />

McCarthy, P.M. 1995. A reappraisal of<br />

Clathroporina Müll. Arg.<br />

(Trichotheliaceae). - Lichenologist 27: 321-<br />

350.<br />

McNeill, J., Barrie, F. R., Burdet. H. M.,<br />

Demoulin, V., Hawksworth, D. L., Marhold,<br />

K., Nicols<strong>on</strong>, D. H., Prado, J., Silva, P. C.,<br />

Skog, J. E., Wiersema, J. H., & Turland, N.<br />

J. (eds.) 2006. Internati<strong>on</strong>al Code of<br />

Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code)<br />

adopted by the Seventeenth Internati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

Botanical C<strong>on</strong>gress Vienna, Austria, July<br />

2005. Gantner Verlag, Ruggell,<br />

Liechtenstein.<br />

Miadlikowska, J., Kauff, F., Hofstetter, V.,<br />

Fraker, E., Grube, M., Hafellner, J., Reeb,<br />

V., Hodkins<strong>on</strong>, B. P., Kukwa, M., Lücking,<br />

R., Hestmark, G., Garcia Otalora, M.,<br />

Rauhut, A., Büdel, B., Scheidegger, C.,<br />

Timdal, E., Stenroos, S., Brodo, I.,<br />

Perlmutter, G., Ertz, D., Diederich, P.,<br />

Lendemer, J. C., May, P., Schoch, C. L.,<br />

Arnold, A. E., Gueidan, C., Tripp, E., Yahr,<br />

R., Roberts<strong>on</strong>, C. & Lutz<strong>on</strong>i, F. 2006. New<br />

insights into classificati<strong>on</strong> and evoluti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

the Lecanoromycetes (Pezizomycotina,<br />

Ascomycota) from phylogenetic analyses of<br />

three ribosomal RNA- and two proteincoding<br />

genes. - Mycologia 98:1088-1103.<br />

Miller, A.N., Shearer, C.A., Bartolata, M. &<br />

Huhndorf, S.M. 2006. Cuspidatispora<br />

xiphiago gen. et spec. nov. from an eastern<br />

North American creek. – Mycoscience 47:<br />

218-223.<br />

Morais, P.B., Teixeira, L.C.R.S., Bowles, J.M.,<br />

Lachance, M.A. & Rosa, C.A. 2004.<br />

Ogataea falcaomoraissii sp. nov., a


sporogenous methylotrophic yeast from tree<br />

exudates. – FEMS Yeast Res. 5: 81-85.<br />

Mostert, L., Groenewald, J.Z., Summerbell,<br />

R.C., Gams, W. & Crous, P.W. 2006.<br />

Tax<strong>on</strong>omy and pathology of Togninia<br />

(Diaporthales) and its Phaeoacrem<strong>on</strong>ium<br />

anamorphs. – Stud. Mycol. 54: 1-115.<br />

Myllys, L., Högnabba, F., Lohtander, K., Thell,<br />

A., Stenroos, S. & Hyvönen, J. 2005.<br />

Phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships of<br />

Stereocaulaceae based <strong>on</strong> simultaneous<br />

analysis of beta-tubulin, GAPDH and SSU<br />

rDNA sequences. – Tax<strong>on</strong> 54: 605-618.<br />

Nakab<strong>on</strong>ge, G., Gryzenhout, M., Roux, J.,<br />

Wingfield, B.D. & Wingfield, M.J. 2006.<br />

Celoporthe dispersa gen. et sp. nov. from<br />

native Myrtales in South Africa. – Stud.<br />

Mycol. 55: 255-267.<br />

Naumov, G.I., Naumova, E.S., Smith, M.T. & de<br />

Hoog, G.S. 2003. Ribosomal DNA<br />

sequencing and reinstatement of the genus<br />

Arthroascus v<strong>on</strong> Arx. – J. Gen. Appl.<br />

Microbiol. 49: 267-270.<br />

Naumov, G.I., Naumova, E.S., Smith, M.T. & de<br />

Hoog, G.S. 2006. Molecular-genetic<br />

diversity of the ascomycetous yeast genus<br />

Arthroascus: Arthroascus babjevae sp. nov.,<br />

Arthroascus fermentans var. arxii var. nov.<br />

and geographical populati<strong>on</strong>s of Arthroascus<br />

schoenii. – Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56:<br />

1997-2007.<br />

Nguyen, N.H., Suh, S.-O., Marshall, C.J. &<br />

Blackwell, M. 2006. Morphological and<br />

ecological similarities: wood-boring beetles<br />

associated with novel xylose-fermenting<br />

yeasts, Spathaspora passalidarum gen. nov.<br />

and Candida jeffriesii sp. nov. – Mycol. Res.<br />

110: 1232-1241.<br />

Nordén, B., Sunhede, S. & Larss<strong>on</strong>, E. 2005<br />

New species of Moristroma (Ascomycetes)<br />

and phylogenetic positi<strong>on</strong> of the genus. –<br />

Mycol. Progr. 4: 325-332.<br />

Nordin, A. & Tibell, L. 2005. Additi<strong>on</strong>al species<br />

in Tetramelas. – Lichenologist 37: 491-498.<br />

Ohmura, Y. 2002. Phylogenetic evaluati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

infrageneric groups of the genus Usnea<br />

based <strong>on</strong> ITS regi<strong>on</strong>s in rDNA. – J. Hattori<br />

Bot. Lab. 91: 231-243.<br />

Pang, K.-L., Gareth J<strong>on</strong>es, E.B. & Vrijmoed,<br />

L.P. 2004. Two new marine fungi from<br />

96<br />

China and Singapore, with the descripti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

a new genus, Sablecola (Halosphaeriales,<br />

Ascomycota). – Can. J. Bot. 82: 485-490.<br />

Pang, K.-L., Gareth J<strong>on</strong>es, E.B., Vrijmoed, L.P.<br />

& Vikineswary, S. 2004. Okeanomyces, a<br />

new genus to accommodate Halosphaeria<br />

cucullata (Halosphaeriales, Ascomycota). –<br />

Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146: 223-229.<br />

Peter, G., Dlauchy, D., Tornai-Lehoczki, J. &<br />

Kurtzman, C.P). 2005. Kuraishia<br />

molischiana sp. nov., the teleomorph of<br />

Candida molischiana. – Ant<strong>on</strong>ie van<br />

Leeuwenhoek 88: 241-247.<br />

Peter, G., Tornal-Lehoczki, J., Shin, K.S. &<br />

Dlauchy, D. 2007. Ogataea thermophila sp.<br />

nov., the teleomorph of Candida<br />

thermophila. – FEMS Yeast Res. 7: 494-<br />

496.<br />

Petrak, F. 1953. Ein Beitrag zur Pilzflora<br />

Floridas. Sydowia 7:103-<strong>13</strong>2.<br />

Printzen, C. 1999. Japewiella gen. nov., a new<br />

lichen genus and a new species from<br />

Mexico. – Bryologist 102: 714-719.<br />

Rambold, G. 1989. A M<strong>on</strong>ograph of the<br />

Saxicolous Lecideoid Lichens of Australia<br />

(Excl. Tasmania). – Bibl. Lichenol. 34: 1-<br />

345.<br />

Réblová, M. 2006. Molecular <strong>systematics</strong> of<br />

Ceratostomella sensu lato and<br />

morphologically similar fungi. – Mycologia<br />

98: 68-93.<br />

Rice, A.V. & Currah, R.S. 2006. Two new<br />

species of Pseudogymnoascus with<br />

Geomyces anamorphs and their phylogenetic<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ship with Gymnostellatospora. –<br />

Mycologia 98: 307-318.<br />

Rogers, J.D., Ju, Y.M. & Hemmes, D.E. 2006.<br />

Hypoxyl<strong>on</strong> subdisciforme sp. nov., Nemania<br />

abortiva sp. nov., and Xylotumulus<br />

gibbisporus gen. et sp. nov. from Hawaii,<br />

Hawaiian Islands. – Sydowia 58: 290-299.<br />

Ryan, B.D. 2004. Lignoscripta. In: Nash, T.H.,<br />

III, Ryan, B.D., Diederich, P., Gries, C. &<br />

Bungartz, F. (eds.): Lichen Flora of the<br />

Greater S<strong>on</strong>oran Desert Regi<strong>on</strong>. II. Lichens<br />

Unlimited, Ariz<strong>on</strong>a State University,<br />

Tempe, Ariz<strong>on</strong>a, pp. 350-351.<br />

Santess<strong>on</strong>, R., Moberg, R., Nordin, A.,<br />

Tønsberg, T. & Vitikainen, O. 2004. Lichenforming<br />

and lichenicolous fungi of


Fennoscandia. Museum of Evoluti<strong>on</strong>,<br />

Uppsala, University, Uppsala.<br />

Schmitt, I., Mueller, G. & Lumbsch, H.T. 2005.<br />

Ascoma morphology is homoplaseous and<br />

phylogenetically misleading in some<br />

pyrenocarpous lichens. - Mycologia 97: 362-<br />

374.<br />

Schmitt, I., Yamamoto, Y. & Lumbsch, H.T.<br />

2006. Phylogeny of Pertusariales<br />

(Ascomycotina): resurrecti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Ochrolechiaceae and new circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Megasporaceae. – J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 100:<br />

753-764.<br />

Schoch C.L., Crous P.W., Wingfield M. &<br />

Wingfield B.D. 2000. Phylogeny of<br />

Cal<strong>on</strong>ectria and selected hypocrealean<br />

genera with cylindrical macroc<strong>on</strong>idea. -<br />

Studies in Mycology 45: 45-62.<br />

Schoch, C.L., Kohlmeyer, J., Volkmann-<br />

Kohlmeyer, B., Tsui, C.K.M. & Spatafora,<br />

J.W. 2006. The halotolerant fungus<br />

Glomerobolus gelineus is a member of the<br />

Ostropales. – Mycol. Res. 110: 257-263.<br />

Schoch, C.L., Shoemaker, R.A., Seifert, K.A.,<br />

Hamblet<strong>on</strong>, S., Spatafora, J.W. & Crous,<br />

P.W. 2007 (“2006”). A multigene phylogeny<br />

of the Dothideomycetes using four nuclear<br />

loci. – Mycologia 98: 1041-1052.<br />

Schoch, C.L., Sung, G.H., Volkmann-<br />

Kohlmeyer, B., Kohlmeyer, J. & Spatafora,<br />

J.W. 2007b. Marine fungal lineages in the<br />

Hypocreomycetidae. – Mycol. Research<br />

111: 154-162.<br />

Schroers, H.-J., Samuels, G.J. & Gams, W. 1999.<br />

Stephan<strong>on</strong>ectria, a new genus of<br />

Hypocreales (Bi<strong>on</strong>ectriaceae), and its<br />

sporodochial anamorph. – Sydowia 51: 114-<br />

126.<br />

Serusiaux, E. & Lücking, R. 2003. The lichen<br />

genus Caprettia Bat. & H. Maia<br />

(M<strong>on</strong>oblastiaceae). – Bibl. Lichenol. 86:<br />

161-176.<br />

Serusiaux, E. & Lücking, R. 2007.<br />

Gallaicolichen, a new genus of foliicolous<br />

lichen with unique diaspores. – Bibl.<br />

Lichenol. 95: 509-516.<br />

Sérusiaux, E., Fischer, E. & Killmann, D. 2006.<br />

Nyungwea, a new genus of lichen with<br />

goiniocyst-producing stipes from Rwanda<br />

97<br />

and Uganda (East Africa). - Lichenologist<br />

38: 115-121.<br />

Smith, M.E., Trappe, J.M. & Rizzo, D.M. 2006.<br />

Genea, Genabea and Gilkeya gen. nov.:<br />

ascomata and ectomycorrhiza formati<strong>on</strong> in a<br />

Quercus woodland. – Mycologia 98: 699-<br />

716.<br />

Sparrius, L.B. 2004. A m<strong>on</strong>ograph of<br />

Enterographa and Sclerophyt<strong>on</strong>. – Bibl.<br />

Lichenol. 89: 1-141.<br />

Spatafora, J.W., Sung, G.H., Johns<strong>on</strong>, D., Hesse,<br />

C., O’Rourke, B., Serdani, M., Spotts, R.,<br />

Lutz<strong>on</strong>i, F., Hofstetter, V., Miadlikowska, J.,<br />

Reeb, V., Gueidan, C., Fraker, E., Lumbsch,<br />

T., Lücking, R., Schmitt, I., Hosaka, K.,<br />

Aptroot, A., Roux, C., Miller, A.N., Geiser,<br />

D.M., Hafellner, J., Hestmark, G., Arnold,<br />

A.E., Büdel, B., Rauhut, A., Hewitt, D.,<br />

Untereiner, W.A., Cole, M.S., Scheidegger,<br />

C., Sipman, H. & Schoch, C.L. 2007<br />

(“2006”). A five-gene phylogeny of<br />

Pezizomycotina. – Mycologia 98: 1018-<br />

1028.<br />

Spo<strong>on</strong>er B.M. 1987. Helotiales of Australasia:<br />

Geoglossaceae, Orbiliaceae, Sclerotiniaceae,<br />

Hyaloscyphaceae. – Bibl. Mycol. 116: 1-<br />

711.<br />

Stadler M., Læssøe T., & Vasilyeva L. 2005. The<br />

genus Pyrenomyxa and its affinities to other<br />

cleistocarpous Hypoxyloideae as inferred<br />

from morphological and chemical traits. -<br />

Mycologia 97: 1129-1<strong>13</strong>9.<br />

Staiger, B. 2002. Die Flechtenfamilie<br />

Graphidaceae. Studien in Richtung einer<br />

natürlicheren Gliederung. – Bibl. Lichenol.<br />

95: 1-526.<br />

Staiger, B., Kalb, K. & Grube, M. 2006.<br />

Phylogeny and phenotypic variati<strong>on</strong> in the<br />

lichen family Graphidaceae<br />

(Ostropomycetidae, Ascomycota). – Mycol.<br />

Res. 110: 765-772.<br />

Stenroos, S., Stocker-Wörgötter, E., Yoshimura,<br />

I., Myllys, L., Thell, A. & Hyvönen, J. 2003.<br />

Culture experiments and DNA sequence<br />

data c<strong>on</strong>firm the identity of Lobaria<br />

photomorphs. – Can. J. Bot. 81: 232-247.<br />

Stenroos, S., Myllys, L., Thell, A. & Hyvönen, J.<br />

2002. Phylogenetic hypotheses:<br />

Clad<strong>on</strong>iaceae, Stereocaulaceae,<br />

Baeomycetaceae, and Icmadophilaceae<br />

revisited. – Mycol. Progress 1: 267-282.


Sugiyama, J., Hosaka, K. & Suh, S.O. 2007<br />

(“2006”). Early diverging Ascomycota:<br />

phylogenetic divergence and related<br />

evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary enigmas. – Mycologia 98: 996-<br />

1005.<br />

Suh, S.O., Blackwell, M., Kurtzman, C.P. &<br />

Lachance, M.A. 2007 (“2006”).<br />

Phylogenetics of Saccharomycetales, the<br />

<strong>ascomycete</strong> yeasts. – Mycologia 98: 1006-<br />

1017.<br />

Suková, M. 2005. A revisi<strong>on</strong> of selected material<br />

of lignicolous species of Brunnipila,<br />

Capitotricha, Dasyscyphella and<br />

Neodasyscypha from the Czech Republic. –<br />

Czech Mycol. 57: <strong>13</strong>9-172.<br />

Tanaka, K., Harada, Y. & Barr, M.E. 2005.<br />

Trematosphaeria: tax<strong>on</strong>omic c<strong>on</strong>cepts, new<br />

species from Japan and key to species. -<br />

Fungal Diversity 19: 145-156.<br />

Tang, A.M.C., Jeew<strong>on</strong>, R. & Hyde, K.D. 2007.<br />

Phylogenetic utility of protein (RPB2, ßtubulin)<br />

and ribosomal (LSU, SSU) gene<br />

sequences in the <strong>systematics</strong> of<br />

Sordariomycetes (Ascomycota, Fungi). –<br />

Ant<strong>on</strong>ie van Leeuwenhoek 91: 327-349.<br />

Taylor, J.E. & Hyde, K.D. 2003. Microfungi of<br />

tropical and temperate palms. H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g.<br />

Thell, A., Feuerer, T., Elix, J.A. & Kärnelfelt, I.<br />

2006. A c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to the phylogeny and<br />

tax<strong>on</strong>omy of Xanthoparmelia (Ascomycota,<br />

Parmeliaceae). – J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 100:<br />

797-807.<br />

Thell, A., Feuerer, T., Kärnefelt, I., Myllys, L. &<br />

Stenroos, S. 2004. M<strong>on</strong>ophyletic groups<br />

within the Parmeliaceae identified by ITS<br />

rDNA, β-tubulin and GAPDH sequences. –<br />

Mycol. Progr. 3: 296-314.<br />

Thell, A., Randlane, T., Saag, A. & Kärnefelt, I.<br />

2005. A new circumscripti<strong>on</strong> of the lichen<br />

genus Nephromopsis (Parmeliaceae,<br />

lichenized Ascomycetes). – Mycol. Progr. 4:<br />

303-316.<br />

Thell, A., Søchting, U., Kärnefelt, I., Elix, J.A. &<br />

Sancho, L.G. 2007. Phylogeny of<br />

Himantormia – an Antarctic genus in the<br />

Parmeliaceae (lichenized <strong>ascomycete</strong>s). –<br />

Bibl. Lichenol. 95: 531-541.<br />

Thomas, M.A., Ryan, D.J., Farnden, K.J. &<br />

Galloway, D.J. 2002. Observati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong><br />

phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships within<br />

98<br />

Lobariaceae Chevall. (Lecanorales,<br />

Ascomycota) in New Zealand, based <strong>on</strong><br />

ITS-5.8S molecular sequence data. – Bibl.<br />

Lichenol. 82: 123-<strong>13</strong>8.<br />

Tsui, C.K.M. & Berbee, M.L. 2006.<br />

Phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships and c<strong>on</strong>vergence<br />

of helicosporous fungi inferred from<br />

ribosomal DNA sequences. – Mol.<br />

Phylogen. Evol. 39: 587-<strong>59</strong>7.<br />

Untereiner, W.A., Naveau, F.A., Bachewich, J.<br />

& Angus, A. 2006. Evoluti<strong>on</strong>ary<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships of Hyphodiscus hyemniophilus<br />

(anamorph Catenulifera rhodogena) inferred<br />

from β-tubulin and nuclear ribosomal DNA<br />

sequences. – Can. J. Bot. 84: 243-253.<br />

Vassilijeva, L.N. 2007. Pyrenomycetes of the<br />

Russian Far East 2. Mollicamarops stellata<br />

gen. et sp. nov. – Mycotax<strong>on</strong> 99: 1<strong>59</strong>-162.<br />

Vezda, A. 1997. Schedae ad lichenes rariores<br />

exsiccati, Fasc. XXVII: 1-7.<br />

Vezda, A. 2004. Zur Systematik v<strong>on</strong> Bacidia<br />

permira (foliicole Flechte, Ascomcyotina). –<br />

Czech Mycol. 56: 149-150.<br />

Vezda, A. 2004b. Neue foliicole Flechten III. –<br />

Acta Mus. Richnov., sect. Natur. 11: 57-72.<br />

Vijaykrishna, D., Jeew<strong>on</strong>, R. & Hyde, K.D.<br />

2005. Fusoidispora aquatica: A new<br />

<strong>ascomycete</strong> from H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g based <strong>on</strong><br />

morphology and phylogeny inferred from<br />

rDNA sequences. – Sydowia 57: 267-280.<br />

Walker, J. 2004. Claviceps phalaridis in<br />

Australia: biology, pathology and tax<strong>on</strong>omy<br />

with a descripti<strong>on</strong> of the new genus<br />

Cepsiclava (Hypocreales, Clavicipitaceae).<br />

Australas. Pl. Path. 33: 211-239.<br />

Wang, Z., Binder, M., Schoch, C.L., Johnst<strong>on</strong>,<br />

P.R., Spatafora, J.W. & Hibbett, D.S. 2006.<br />

Evoluti<strong>on</strong> of helotialean fungi<br />

(Leotiomycetes, Pezizomycotina): a nuclear<br />

rDNA phylogeny. – Mol. Phylogen. Evol.<br />

41: 295-312.<br />

Wang, Z., Johnst<strong>on</strong>, P.R., Takamatsu, S.,<br />

Spatafora, J.W. & Hibbett, D.S. 2007<br />

(“2006”). Toward a phylogenetic<br />

classificati<strong>on</strong> of the Leotiomycetes based <strong>on</strong><br />

rDNA data. – Mycologia 98: 1065-1075.<br />

Wedin, M., Baloch, E. & Grube, M. 2002.<br />

Parsim<strong>on</strong>y analyses of mtSSU an nITS<br />

rDNA sequences reveal the natural<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships of the lichen families


Physciaceae and Caliciaceae. - Tax<strong>on</strong> 51:<br />

655-660.<br />

Wedin, M. & Wiklund, E. 2004. The<br />

phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships of Lecanorales<br />

suborder Peltigerineae revisited. – Symb.<br />

Bot. Upsal. 34(1): 469-475.<br />

Wedin, M., Wiklund, E., Crewe, A., Döring, H.,<br />

Ekman, S., Nyberg, Å., Schmitt, I. &<br />

Lumbsch, H.T. 2005. Phylogenetic<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ships of Lecanoromycetes<br />

(Ascomycota) as revealed by analyses of<br />

mtSSU and nLSU rDNA seqaence data. –<br />

Mycol. Research 109: 1<strong>59</strong>-172.<br />

Wedin. M., Jørgensen, P.M. & Wiklund, E.<br />

2007. Massal<strong>on</strong>giaceae fam. nov., an<br />

overlooked m<strong>on</strong>ophyletic group am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

cyanobacterial lichens (Peltigerales,<br />

Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycotina). –<br />

Lichenologist 39: 61-67.<br />

Wiklund, E. & Wedin, M. 2003. The<br />

phylogenetic relati<strong>on</strong>ships of the<br />

cyanobacterial lichens in the Lecanorales<br />

suborder Peltigerineae. – Cladistics 19: 419-<br />

431.<br />

Wirtz, N., Printzen, C., Sancho, L.G. &<br />

Lumbsch, H.T. 2006. The phylogeny and<br />

classificati<strong>on</strong> of Neuropog<strong>on</strong> and Usnea<br />

(Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) revisited. -<br />

Tax<strong>on</strong> 55: 367-376.<br />

Wor<strong>on</strong>ichin N.N. (1916). Izvestiya Kavkaz.<br />

Muz. 10(1): 7 (1916).<br />

Yoshimura, I. 2002. Lobariella. - In: Nash, T.H.,<br />

III, Ryan, B.D., Gries, C. & Bungartz, F.<br />

(eds.): Lichen Flora of the Greater S<strong>on</strong>oran<br />

Desert Regi<strong>on</strong>. I. Lichens Unlimited,<br />

Ariz<strong>on</strong>a State University, Tempe, Ariz<strong>on</strong>a,<br />

pp. 270-272.<br />

Zhang, N., Castlebury, L.A., Miller, A.N.,<br />

Huhndorf, S.M., Schoch, C.L., Seifert, K.A.,<br />

Rossman, A.J., Rogers, J.D., Kohlmeyer, J.,<br />

Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, B. & Sung, G.H.<br />

2007. An overview of the <strong>systematics</strong> of the<br />

Sordariomycetes based <strong>on</strong> a four-gene<br />

phylogeny. – Mycologia 98: 1076-1987.<br />

Zhou, Q.-M., Wei, J.-C., Ahti, T., Stenroos, S. &<br />

Högnabba, F. 2006. The systematic positi<strong>on</strong><br />

of Gymnoderma and Cetrad<strong>on</strong>ia based <strong>on</strong><br />

SSU rDNA sequences. – J. Hattori Bot. Lab.<br />

100: 871-880.<br />

99<br />

Zhuang, W.-Y. & Liu, C.-Y. 2006. A new<br />

species of Geopyxis (Pezizales,<br />

Pyrenometaceae) with ornamented<br />

ascospores from China. – Nova Hedwigia<br />

83: 177-186.<br />

Zipfel, R.D., de Beer, Z.W., Jacobs, K.,<br />

Wingfield, B.D. & Wingfield, M.J. 2006.<br />

Multi-gene phylogenies define<br />

Ceratocystiopsis and Grosmannia distinct<br />

from Ophiostoma. – Stud. Mycol. 55: 75-97.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!