Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes
Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes
Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
inding energy for perpendicular excitation than for parallel excitation, which is responsible for<br />
the blue shift 139 . On the contrary, in our data, no blue shift is observed in the E12 transition<br />
(Figure III-16 (b)). A theoretical work by Uryu et al. predicts a large blue shift of the E12 peak<br />
that depends on the strength of the Coulomb interaction in SWNTs 133 ; their results show that in<br />
the absence of a strong Coulomb interaction, E12 is close to (E11 + E22)/2. In the PL<br />
measurements in which large blue shifts were observed in transverse polarization, the tubes were<br />
suspended structurally or kept in a surfactant suspension in order to reduce interaction <strong>with</strong> the<br />
environment. In contrast, our devices are directly on the substrate, which significantly increases<br />
the dielectric constant of the environment that screens the Coulomb interaction. In our analysis,<br />
ε = 3.3 is used which includes ε = 3.9 of the silicon oxide substrate. This significantly reduces<br />
the Coulomb interaction in the CNTs on substrate, which could account for the absence of a blue<br />
shift of the E12 transition.<br />
Lastly, E12 and E21 transitions are degenerate in the single-particle framework, but this no<br />
longer applies if the asymmetry between valence and conduction bands are taken into account<br />
140 . Miyauchi et al. has found about a 100 meV difference between the two peaks in<br />
perpendicular excitations 30 . However, as has been discussed, all excitonic peaks are<br />
significantly broadened and we are not able to determine whether what we consider the E12<br />
transition is actually a double peak consisting of E12 and E21 signatures.<br />
64