Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes
Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes
Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the optical phonon population is not saturated as in suspended tubes, <strong>with</strong> the temperature <<br />
1200 K.<br />
As the applied power is increased, the electronic temperature should rise, unless the<br />
kinetic energy is dissipated via some other decay channel, which we claimed is the impact<br />
excitation mechanism. We have already cited temperature saturation as its supporting evidence.<br />
If the impact excitation mechanism is responsible for the lack of electronic temperature increase,<br />
that should result in an increase in emission per injected carrier. Figure III-12 shows that<br />
emission intensity per injected carrier (i.e., current) does increase almost to the third power as the<br />
applied power is increased, indicating that the EL efficiency is much greater at a higher power.<br />
If the 60 meV broadening is indeed due to electronic heating at a constant temperature, the figure<br />
is much smaller than reported by Freitag et al. where a five-fold broadening has been attributed<br />
to electronic heating. The difference, compared to our small electronic heating, is most likely<br />
due to the partially suspended nature of their device. Optical phonon saturation has been known<br />
to occur in suspended structures 87 , leading to a higher electronic temperature in their device.<br />
Figure III-12. Integrated Lorentz peak intensity as a function of current. The fit<br />
(solid line) shows that there is almost a cubic dependence on the current.<br />
While the EL efficiency increase supports a constant in electronic temperature, it does not<br />
guarantee it (electron temperature can still increase in the presence of a greater EL efficiency),<br />
58