07.08.2013 Views

Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure III-1. Semi-log plot of drain current as a function of gate voltage at drainsource<br />

biases of -1 V, -3 V, -5 V and -7 V. The dotted arrows indicate the gate sweep<br />

direction.<br />

In order to obtain sufficient signal-to-noise ratio, most of our light emission data is taken<br />

at a high source-drain bias, so the electrical transport is typically near or in the saturation regime,<br />

in the order of 1 to 10 μA. Taking measurements at saturation also makes the data more stable<br />

and reproducible because the results are beyond the influence of charge traps in the substrate. A<br />

typical saturation behavior of our devices is shown as a function of VDS for different VGS values<br />

in Figure III-2. Recall that for metallic SWNTs on a substrate, the saturation current is about 25<br />

μA, while the saturation limit for semiconducting SWNTs depends on the diameter and work<br />

function of metal contacts 56 (note: large-diameter tubes have been shown to be similar to<br />

metallic tubes 55, 57 ). Since we chose small-diameter (i.e., large Schottky-barrier)<br />

semiconducting SWNTs for this study, the saturation current varies significantly from device to<br />

device. Furthermore, since most of our devices are 1-2 μm long, acoustic phonon scattering<br />

(mfp ~ 300-700 nm) and even defects could further reduce the saturation limit.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!