Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu
from dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu More from this publisher
07.08.2013 Views

Polarized measurements were taken with a linear polarizer, i.e. a Glan-Taylor prism in the infrared, in the parallel section of the beam bath as indicated in figure 3. The polarizer was rotated normal to the beam path to specific angles with respect to the tube orientation. The CNT orientation was determined by an optical microscope (not shown in figure) using the metal contacts as reference and comparing them to an SEM image of the device. In low-temperature experiments, the sample stage was first cooled down as much as possible (~20 K). For physical stability, the liquid helium transfer line was subsequently disconnected from the stage in order to mechanically decouple the measurement system from the environment. The probe needles were then lowered onto the contact pads, allowing the temperature to rise and then stabilize around 90 K for the first set of measurements. Since in this set-up, the temperature returns slowly to room temperature over several hours, it was possible to contact probe needles to the contact pads periodically to take a measurement at a given temperature. A resistor heater attached to the cold pad of the sample stage was used to raise the temperature when necessary. Only the sample stage was cooled, while the rest of the optical path remained at room temperature. 37

Chapter III Unipolar, High-Bias Emission 1. Introduction Chapter I showed that both ambipolar and unipolar emission has been demonstrated with CNTFET devices 10, 71-74, 76, 85, 97 . In a sense, ambipolar emission gives greater experimental control; one can manage the relative electron and hole injection rates by setting the drain (VDS) and the gate biases (VGS) appropriately 74 . In contrast, in the unipolar scheme we do not know the electric field strength of an emission spot, or the distribution of carrier kinetic energy. Nevertheless, certain features of ambipolar emission pose practical experimental problems that make it less appropriate for our purposes; to study the electrically-induced emission by investigating intensities and spectra from CNT devices and to build more efficient and robust devices. In order to have a symmetric device with respect to both carriers, the Fermi level needs to align mid-gap, and the device needs to be operated in the “off” state (i.e., at the bottom of the “V” shape in the gate sweep; see Figure III-3 for example) with a large source- drain bias in order to inject enough carriers. In addition, the radiative efficiency of electrical excitation has been shown to be about 10 -6 at best 76 . Because of the high blackbody background noise from the optical components at ambient temperature (see Method), the long-wavelength limit of the detection window is around 2100 nm, or 0.590 eV. Ambipolar emission requires larger diameter tubes of at least 2 nm or larger for sufficiently thin Schottky barriers, and the corresponding E11 energy is around 0.55 to 0.56 eV or lower 15 which lies outside the detection window. In addition, a large source-drain bias means a large stress on the device, leading to heating and/or oxidation/destruction of the device. Since it needs to operate in the “off” state where VGS ~ VDS/2, it is difficult to pass large enough currents to obtain intensity-dependent spectra. For these reasons, for this study the unipolar scheme was chosen where multiple electron- hole pairs can be created from a single injected carrier type. Since only one type of carriers needs to be injected, to facilitate transport the Fermi level of the metal can be aligned to either the conduction or valence band edge. In order to obtain emission intensity comparable to that from an ambipolar device, a larger bandgap tube and therefore a larger E11 energy can be used, 38

Chapter III Unipolar, High-Bias Emission<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Chapter I showed that both ambipolar and unipolar emission has been demonstrated <strong>with</strong><br />

CNTFET devices 10, 71-74, 76, 85, 97 . In a sense, ambipolar emission gives greater experimental<br />

control; one can manage the relative electron and hole injection rates by setting the drain (VDS)<br />

and the gate biases (VGS) appropriately 74 . In contrast, in the unipolar scheme we do not know<br />

the electric field strength of an emission spot, or the distribution of carrier kinetic energy.<br />

Nevertheless, certain features of ambipolar emission pose practical experimental<br />

problems that make it less appropriate for our purposes; to study the electrically-induced<br />

emission by investigating intensities and spectra from CNT devices and to build more efficient<br />

and robust devices. In order to have a symmetric device <strong>with</strong> respect to both carriers, the Fermi<br />

level needs to align mid-gap, and the device needs to be operated in the “off” state (i.e., at the<br />

bottom of the “V” shape in the gate sweep; see Figure III-3 for example) <strong>with</strong> a large source-<br />

drain bias in order to inject enough carriers. In addition, the radiative efficiency of electrical<br />

excitation has been shown to be about 10 -6 at best 76 .<br />

Because of the high blackbody background noise from the optical components at ambient<br />

temperature (see Method), the long-wavelength limit of the detection window is around 2100<br />

nm, or 0.590 eV. Ambipolar emission requires larger diameter tubes of at least 2 nm or larger<br />

for sufficiently thin Schottky barriers, and the corresponding E11 energy is around 0.55 to 0.56<br />

eV or lower 15 which lies outside the detection window. In addition, a large source-drain bias<br />

means a large stress on the device, leading to heating and/or oxidation/destruction of the device.<br />

Since it needs to operate in the “off” state where VGS ~ VDS/2, it is difficult to pass large enough<br />

currents to obtain intensity-dependent spectra.<br />

For these reasons, for this study the unipolar scheme was chosen where multiple electron-<br />

hole pairs can be created from a single injected carrier type. Since only one type of carriers<br />

needs to be injected, to facilitate transport the Fermi level of the metal can be aligned to either<br />

the conduction or valence band edge. In order to obtain emission intensity comparable to that<br />

from an ambipolar device, a larger bandgap tube and therefore a larger E11 energy can be used,<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!