07.08.2013 Views

Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(a) (b)<br />

Figure I-2 (a) Energy dispersion of graphene showing inequivalent K and K’ points as<br />

blue and red dots, and (b) details at low energy, showing the linear dispersion. K, K’,<br />

M, and Γ are high-symmetry points in graphene’s Brillouin zone. The plane of the<br />

hexagons denotes the Fermi level.<br />

Figure I-3 further illustrates the difference between these two types of SWNTs in<br />

reciprocal space. If the quantized momentum vector in the circumferential direction of an<br />

SWNT coincides <strong>with</strong> a Dirac point, it is metallic. If it misses the Dirac point, it creates an<br />

energy gap (i.e., the cone is cut away from the point) and the SWNT is semiconducting. Using<br />

the (n, m) indices, it can be shown that if (n - m) / 3 is an integer, the SWNT is metallic;<br />

otherwise it is semiconducting. Therefore, if SWNTs are produced randomly in bulk, two-thirds<br />

should be semiconducting on the average. It should be pointed out that this is a simplified<br />

picture in the first order approximation, and the linear dispersion approximation may be less<br />

valid in certain situations such as in small-diameter tubes (i.e., large unit wave vector in the<br />

circumferential direction). For example, the so-called trigonal warping effect (a distortion of<br />

equi-energy contours away from the circular shape that connect M points in a triangle) can create<br />

a small energy gap in the order of meVs in metallic nanotubes 4, 13 .<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!