07.08.2013 Views

Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

iases constant at -5V and +5 V, and stepped up the VDS in the positive (a) and negative (b)<br />

directions to induce the two different modes similar to Figure V-8. We fit Gaussian distributions<br />

to the spectra to extract the peak positions and the widths under the assumption that the emission<br />

comes from a collection of multiple tubes <strong>with</strong> a distribution of diameters. As we shall see in the<br />

following, the emission is not a simple reflection of the diameter distribution; however there is<br />

still a multiple-tube effect and the Gaussian function fits the emission profile quite adequately<br />

(Figure V-10 (b), inset).<br />

The device emits electroluminescence in the near infrared <strong>with</strong> a maximum spectral<br />

intensity at about 0.58 eV in the forward direction and 0.60 eV in reverse. There was no<br />

measurable peak shift observed as the input power was increased. Given the diameter range of<br />

1.3 nm to 1.7 nm and referring to the Kataura plot 15 , the intensity peaks are at the lowest edge of<br />

the E11 energy range for the sample, in agreement <strong>with</strong> Ref. 97. As Engel et al. suggests 99 , this<br />

is expected since larger diameter tubes have smaller Schottky barriers which is critical for carrier<br />

injection, and excitons efficiently relax into lower-energy states in large-diameter tubes 159, 160 .<br />

Adam, et al. found a similar effect in their carbon-nanotube network FETs operated <strong>with</strong> a global<br />

gate 97 . An efficient energy transfer mechanism, Förster Resonance Energy Transfer, has been<br />

suggested as the major contributor because of the aligned orientation of dipoles between exciton<br />

donors and acceptors 160 . Qian et al. obtained the maximum transfer rate of 0.5 ps -1 in their<br />

DNA-wrapped CNT sample 159 , which is even faster than the nonradiative decay rate in our<br />

single-tube LEDs (a few ps). As we saw in the AFM profile of our sample (Figure V-1 (c)), the<br />

tubes are largely in bundles; furthermore, most of our tubes are in good alignment <strong>with</strong> each<br />

other (Figures V-1 and V-2), making the Förster interaction a very likely mechanism responsible<br />

for the observation of energy peaks at the lowest-energy edge of our diameter range.<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!