Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes
Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes
Optoelectronics with Carbon Nanotubes
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
iases constant at -5V and +5 V, and stepped up the VDS in the positive (a) and negative (b)<br />
directions to induce the two different modes similar to Figure V-8. We fit Gaussian distributions<br />
to the spectra to extract the peak positions and the widths under the assumption that the emission<br />
comes from a collection of multiple tubes <strong>with</strong> a distribution of diameters. As we shall see in the<br />
following, the emission is not a simple reflection of the diameter distribution; however there is<br />
still a multiple-tube effect and the Gaussian function fits the emission profile quite adequately<br />
(Figure V-10 (b), inset).<br />
The device emits electroluminescence in the near infrared <strong>with</strong> a maximum spectral<br />
intensity at about 0.58 eV in the forward direction and 0.60 eV in reverse. There was no<br />
measurable peak shift observed as the input power was increased. Given the diameter range of<br />
1.3 nm to 1.7 nm and referring to the Kataura plot 15 , the intensity peaks are at the lowest edge of<br />
the E11 energy range for the sample, in agreement <strong>with</strong> Ref. 97. As Engel et al. suggests 99 , this<br />
is expected since larger diameter tubes have smaller Schottky barriers which is critical for carrier<br />
injection, and excitons efficiently relax into lower-energy states in large-diameter tubes 159, 160 .<br />
Adam, et al. found a similar effect in their carbon-nanotube network FETs operated <strong>with</strong> a global<br />
gate 97 . An efficient energy transfer mechanism, Förster Resonance Energy Transfer, has been<br />
suggested as the major contributor because of the aligned orientation of dipoles between exciton<br />
donors and acceptors 160 . Qian et al. obtained the maximum transfer rate of 0.5 ps -1 in their<br />
DNA-wrapped CNT sample 159 , which is even faster than the nonradiative decay rate in our<br />
single-tube LEDs (a few ps). As we saw in the AFM profile of our sample (Figure V-1 (c)), the<br />
tubes are largely in bundles; furthermore, most of our tubes are in good alignment <strong>with</strong> each<br />
other (Figures V-1 and V-2), making the Förster interaction a very likely mechanism responsible<br />
for the observation of energy peaks at the lowest-energy edge of our diameter range.<br />
97