06.08.2013 Views

The Alaska Contractor - Summer 2008

The Alaska Contractor - Summer 2008

The Alaska Contractor - Summer 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What will it take to build<br />

a gas pipeline? BY NANCY ERICKSON<br />

A<br />

menagerie of concepts and engineered drawings of<br />

a pipeline that would someday move North Slope<br />

natural gas to markets have been stacking up in<br />

corporate boardroom file cabinets for decades.<br />

Now with two proposed pipeline projects in the works,<br />

<strong>Alaska</strong>ns might just realize their long-held economic dream.<br />

But not any time soon.<br />

Both TransCanada Corp. and the combined forces of<br />

ConocoPhillips and British Petroleum have proposed similar<br />

gas lines that would stretch approximately 2,000 miles from<br />

<strong>Alaska</strong>’s Prudhoe Bay east into Canada, through the Yukon<br />

Territory and British Columbia, connecting to Alberta’s gas<br />

line grid. From there, gas could be shipped to the continental<br />

United States through existing pipelines or if needed, an additional<br />

line could be constructed extending into the Midwest.<br />

<strong>The</strong> large-diameter pipeline is estimated to move approximately<br />

4 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas to<br />

markets, about 6-8 percent of daily U.S. consumption.<br />

TransCanada was the sole successful bidder in a stateled<br />

effort to build a pipeline under Gov. Sarah Palin’s <strong>Alaska</strong><br />

Gasline Inducement Act, or AGIA, which passed the Legislature<br />

last year.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fate of its project awaits the nod of <strong>Alaska</strong> legislators<br />

who convened in a 60-day special session June 3 to consider<br />

whether to grant the Canadian pipeline company the<br />

license plus half a billion dollars in incentive cash to begin<br />

the process of taking a pipeline to fruition.<br />

<strong>The</strong> joint venture of BP and ConocoPhillips announced<br />

their Denali Pipeline Project in April and plans to spend<br />

$600 million in planning and field data collection over the<br />

next three years with the milestone of beginning an “open<br />

season” before year’s end 2010.<br />

<strong>The</strong> two oil producers hold leases on approximately twothirds<br />

of the North Slope’s prodigious 35 trillion cubic feet<br />

of gas. Exxon holds another third, with some minor holders,<br />

as well.<br />

Part of any pipeline construction, open season is a crucial<br />

process during which the pipeline company seeks customers<br />

to make long-term, firm commitments to ship their gas<br />

through the pipeline.<br />

“No shipper, there’s no pipeline. That’s the market test<br />

for the project,” said Steve Rinehart, press officer for BP Exploration<br />

in Anchorage.<br />

Executives of BP and ConocoPhillips have pledged to<br />

move forward with their $30 billion project whether or not<br />

TransCanada is issued a license to proceed.<br />

“We’re starting. We’re off,” said Rinehart. “Our train has<br />

left the station.”<br />

Company executives feel it’s worth gambling at least<br />

$600 million to bring their proposal to open season, and<br />

then to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> North American market is hungry for <strong>Alaska</strong>’s natural<br />

gas,” stated Angus Walker, a senior vice president and<br />

<br />

<br />

head of BP <strong>Alaska</strong>’s gas line team. “Our focus is on creating<br />

an efficient project at the lowest cost so as to successfully<br />

attract shippers who want to transport gas from <strong>Alaska</strong>’s<br />

North Slope to market. We believe our project offers the<br />

most promising opportunity to do that.”<br />

Can both pipeline projects move ahead? For now they<br />

can. But only one will be built. TransCanada is proceeding<br />

under AGIA with the hopes of getting state approval and the<br />

incentive cash to proceed through open season. <strong>The</strong> Denali<br />

Project is moving ahead through open season on its own.<br />

If both proposals continue beyond open season, it could<br />

put the federal regulatory commission in a position to decide<br />

which gas line project gets a certificate to build and operate,<br />

said Larry Persily, a former associate director for Oil, Gas,<br />

and Renewable Energy; Commerce and Transportation in<br />

Washington, D.C., under the Palin administration.<br />

“FERC does not want to be the decision-maker,” he<br />

said. “<strong>The</strong>y would much rather see the market decide rather<br />

than them.”<br />

Joe Balash, special assistant to Gov. Sarah Palin said the<br />

market could conceivably result in a “settlement” project that<br />

combines or merges the two applicants.<br />

“<strong>The</strong> ambivalence of FERC, combined with their desire<br />

to not decide, will put pressure on both sets of parties to<br />

resolve their differences cooperatively,” he said.<br />

Natural gas 101<br />

Natural gas is a fossil fuel often found mixed with oil<br />

and water and produced from reservoirs deep in the earth’s<br />

surface. Prudhoe Bay’s reservoir is between 8,000 feet- and<br />

9,000 feet deep, according to Rinehart.<br />

According to the Natural Gas Facts Web site, 57 percent<br />

of U.S. households heat with natural gas. It is currently the<br />

nation’s fastest growing energy source, with demand forecast<br />

to increase by approximately 22 percent by 2030.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!