06.08.2013 Views

The Alaska Contractor - Summer 2008

The Alaska Contractor - Summer 2008

The Alaska Contractor - Summer 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

misrepresentations on to the engineer.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Alaska</strong> Supreme Court affirmed.<br />

Although the contractor had relied<br />

on the Trust’s assurances and only<br />

passed them on to the engineer, the<br />

court found that the contractor was<br />

negligent because it had relied merely<br />

on the verbal telephone statements<br />

of the Trust’s administrator. Said the<br />

court, “one would expect a prudent<br />

employer to have written documentation<br />

concerning fixed matters already<br />

of importance dealing with insurance.”<br />

Further, the court thought that the<br />

contractor should have “taken affirmative<br />

action” to determine what was required<br />

to assure nonunion employees<br />

were covered by the union trust fund.<br />

Simply taking the Trust’s spoken word<br />

for it apparently was not enough. <strong>The</strong><br />

court allowed that the contractor’s<br />

position was “a sympathetic one,” but<br />

held that the contractor had a duty “to<br />

take affirmative action to determine<br />

the nature and extent of the healthcare<br />

coverage,” and had failed to meet<br />

that duty.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are several lessons to be<br />

drawn by this case.<br />

First, contractors should require that<br />

assurances about insurance coverage<br />

from union trust funds be in writing.<br />

Second, contractors should take at<br />

least some affirmative action in verifying<br />

the accuracy of what they are told<br />

by the trust funds.<br />

Third, trust fund trustees should<br />

understand that they and their employees<br />

are not necessarily immune<br />

from liability claims. ERISA preempts<br />

only those state laws that “relate to any<br />

employee benefit plan.” If a state law,<br />

meaning a statute or a judicially created<br />

claim, applies to everyone generally,<br />

such as the tort of negligent misrepresentation,<br />

it is not preempted by the<br />

federal statute. Trust funds can be held<br />

liable for their run-of-the-mill negligence<br />

in dealing with others. Trustees<br />

should assure that their administrators<br />

and employees understand that<br />

they are subject to the normal duties<br />

of reasonable care in conducting their<br />

routine business, which the court held<br />

was similar to that of an insurer.<br />

Robert J. (Bob) Dickson is a partner<br />

of the Anchorage law firm Atkinson,<br />

Conway and Gagnon Inc.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!