Commutative algebra - Department of Mathematical Sciences - old ...
Commutative algebra - Department of Mathematical Sciences - old ...
Commutative algebra - Department of Mathematical Sciences - old ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.3.5. Proposition. Given a sequence<br />
The following are equivalent.<br />
0<br />
3.4. EXACTNESS OF TENSOR 49<br />
f<br />
<br />
M<br />
g<br />
<br />
N<br />
(1) The sequence is split exact.<br />
(2) For any K the following sequence is exact<br />
0<br />
<br />
HomR(K, M)<br />
<br />
HomR(K, N)<br />
(3) For any K the following sequence is exact<br />
0<br />
<br />
HomR(L, K)<br />
<br />
HomR(N, K)<br />
<br />
L<br />
<br />
0<br />
<br />
HomR(K, L)<br />
<br />
HomR(M, K)<br />
If the conditions are true, then the sequences (2) and (3) are split exact.<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>. (1) ⇒ (2), (1) ⇒ (3) are clear by 3.1.14 giving that the sequences (2), (3)<br />
are split exact. (2) ⇒ (1): Let K = L, then there is a section to g. By 3.3.2 and<br />
3.1.11 the original sequence is split exact. (3) ⇒ (1): Let K = M, then there is a<br />
retraction to f. By 3.3.4 and 3.1.11 the original sequence is split exact.<br />
3.3.6. Exercise. (1) Show that the sequence<br />
0<br />
<br />
HomZ(Q/Z, Z)<br />
<br />
HomZ(Q/Z, Q)<br />
is exact, but the rightmost map is not surjective.<br />
(2) Show that the sequence<br />
0<br />
<br />
HomZ(Z/(n), Z)<br />
n <br />
HomZ(Z/(n), Z)<br />
is exact, but the rightmost map is not surjective.<br />
3.4. Exactness <strong>of</strong> Tensor<br />
3.4.1. Proposition. Given an exact sequence<br />
M f<br />
g<br />
<br />
N<br />
<br />
L<br />
<br />
0<br />
and an R-module K. Then the following sequence is exact<br />
M ⊗R K<br />
<br />
N ⊗R K<br />
<br />
L ⊗R K<br />
<br />
0<br />
<br />
0<br />
<br />
HomZ(Q/Z, Q/Z)<br />
<br />
HomZ(Z/(n), Z/(n))<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>. Let K ′ be any module. By 3.3.4 it is enough to see that the sequence<br />
0<br />
<br />
HomR(L ⊗R K, K ′ )<br />
is exact. By 2.6.13 it amounts to see that the sequence<br />
0<br />
<br />
HomR(L, HomR(K, K ′ ))<br />
is exact. This follows from 3.3.3.<br />
<br />
0<br />
<br />
HomR(N ⊗R K, K ′ )<br />
<br />
HomR(M ⊗R K, K ′ )<br />
<br />
HomR(M, HomR(K, K ′ ))<br />
<br />
HomR(N, HomR(K, K ′ ))