06.08.2013 Views

Commutative algebra - Department of Mathematical Sciences - old ...

Commutative algebra - Department of Mathematical Sciences - old ...

Commutative algebra - Department of Mathematical Sciences - old ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

48 3. EXACT SEQUENCES OF MODULES<br />

3.3. Exactness <strong>of</strong> Hom<br />

3.3.1. Proposition. Given an exact sequence<br />

0<br />

f<br />

<br />

M<br />

g<br />

<br />

N<br />

<br />

L<br />

and an R-module K. Then the following sequence is exact<br />

0<br />

<br />

HomR(K, M)<br />

<br />

HomR(K, N)<br />

<br />

HomR(K, L)<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. Given h : K → M such that f ◦ h = 0 then h = 0 since f is injective.<br />

Given k : K → N such that g ◦ k = 0 then by 3.1.4 there is h : K → M such that<br />

f ◦ h = k. So the sequence is exact.<br />

3.3.2. Proposition. Given a sequence<br />

0<br />

f<br />

<br />

M<br />

g<br />

<br />

N<br />

<br />

L<br />

Such that for any module K, the following sequence is exact<br />

0<br />

<br />

HomR(K, M)<br />

Then the original sequence is exact.<br />

<br />

HomR(K, N)<br />

<br />

HomR(K, L)<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. For K = M the identity 1M is mapped to g ◦ f ◦ 1M = 0 so it is a 0sequence.<br />

Assume f(x) = 0. Take K = R then 1x is mapped to f ◦ 1x = 1 f(x) =<br />

0. Therefore 1x = 0 and so x = 0. That insures that f is injective. Assume<br />

g(y) = 0. Take K = R then 1y is mapped to g ◦ 1y = 1 g(y) = 0. There exists a<br />

homomorphism h : R → M such that f ◦ h = 1y. By 2.5.12 h = 1x and therefore<br />

f(x) = y. The original sequence is now proven exact.<br />

3.3.3. Proposition. Given an exact sequence<br />

M f<br />

g<br />

<br />

N<br />

<br />

L<br />

and a module K. Then the following sequence is exact<br />

0<br />

<br />

HomR(L, K)<br />

<br />

HomR(N, K)<br />

<br />

0<br />

<br />

HomR(M, K)<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. Given h : L → K such that h ◦ g = 0 then h = 0 since g is surjective.<br />

Given k : N → K such that k ◦ f = 0 then by 3.1.5 there is h : L → K such that<br />

h ◦ g = k. So the sequence is exact.<br />

3.3.4. Proposition. Given a sequence<br />

M f<br />

g<br />

<br />

N<br />

<br />

L<br />

such that for any module K, the following sequence is exact<br />

0<br />

<br />

HomR(L, K)<br />

Then the original sequence is exact.<br />

<br />

HomR(N, K)<br />

<br />

0<br />

<br />

HomR(M, K)<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. For K = L the identity 1L is mapped to 1L ◦g ◦f = 0 so it is a 0-sequence.<br />

Take K = Cok g then pg : L → Cok g has pg ◦ g = 0, but by exactness 0 is the<br />

unique homomorphism satisfying this, so pg = 0. Therefore Cok g = 0 and g is<br />

surjective. Take K = Cok f, p : N → Cok f the projection. p ◦ f = 0 so by<br />

exactness there exists a unique q : L → Cok f such that q ◦ g = p. It follows that<br />

Ker g ⊂ Ker p = Im f. All together the original sequence is exact.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!