06.08.2013 Views

Commutative algebra - Department of Mathematical Sciences - old ...

Commutative algebra - Department of Mathematical Sciences - old ...

Commutative algebra - Department of Mathematical Sciences - old ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14 1. A DICTIONARY ON RINGS AND IDEALS<br />

1.3.6. Example. An ideal in Z is a prime ideal if it is generated by 0 or a prime<br />

number. Any nonzero prime ideal is a maximal ideal.<br />

1.3.7. Definition. For an ideal I in a ring R the radical is<br />

√ I = {a ∈ R|a n ∈ I for some n}<br />

a is nilpotent is a n = 0 for some positive integer n. A ring is reduced if the<br />

nilradical √ 0 = 0, that is if 0 is the only nilpotent element.<br />

1.3.8. Proposition. (1) The radical <strong>of</strong> an ideal is an ideal.<br />

(2) The nilradical is contained in any prime ideal.<br />

(3) A domain is reduced.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. (1) If am , bn ∈ I then by the binomial formula<br />

(a + b) m+n m+n <br />

<br />

m + n<br />

=<br />

a<br />

k<br />

m+n−k b k ∈ I<br />

k=0<br />

and the radical is an ideal. (2) (3) Clearly a nilpotent element is contained in any<br />

prime ideal.<br />

1.3.9. Exercise. (1) Show that the characteristic <strong>of</strong> a domain is either 0 or a prime<br />

number.<br />

(2) Let m, n be a natural numbers. Show that n + (m) ∈ Z/(m) is a unit if and only if<br />

m, n are relative prime.<br />

(3) Let m be a natural number. Show that Z/(m) is reduced if m is square free.<br />

(4) Show that a product <strong>of</strong> reduced rings is reduced.<br />

(5) Let a be nilpotent. Show that 1 − a is a unit.<br />

(6) Let I, J be ideals. Show that √ IJ = √ I ∩ J = √ I ∩ √ J.<br />

(7) Assume an ideal I is contained in a prime ideal P . Show that √ I ⊂ P .<br />

1.4. Chinese remainders<br />

1.4.1. Definition. Ideals I, J ⊂ R are comaximal ideals if I + J = R.<br />

1.4.2. Proposition (Chinese remainder theorem). Let I1, . . . , Ik be pairwise comaximal<br />

ideals in a ring R. Then<br />

(1) For a1, . . . , ak ∈ R there is a a ∈ R, such that a−am ∈ Im for m = 1, . . . , k<br />

(2)<br />

(3) The product <strong>of</strong> projections<br />

is an isomorphism.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. (1) For each m<br />

I1 · · · Ik = I1 ∩ · · · ∩ Ik<br />

R/I1 · · · Ik → R/I1 × · · · × R/Ik<br />

R = <br />

(Im + In) = Im + <br />

n=m<br />

n=m<br />

So choose um ∈ Im and vm ∈ <br />

n=m In with um + vm = 1. Put a = a1v1 + · · · +<br />

akvk. Then a − am = · · · + amum + · · · ∈ Im. (2) For a in the intersection assume<br />

by induction that a ∈ I2 · · · Ik. From the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> (1) a = u1a + av1 ∈ I1 · · · Ik.<br />

(3) Subjectivity follows from (1). The kernel is the intersection which by (2) is the<br />

product. 1.2.9 gives the isomorphism.<br />

In

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!