06.08.2013 Views

subregular nilpotent representations of lie algebras in prime ...

subregular nilpotent representations of lie algebras in prime ...

subregular nilpotent representations of lie algebras in prime ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lemma: If m runs through a basis <strong>of</strong> M, then the set <strong>of</strong> all<br />

Y<br />

>0; 2R1nZI<br />

r( )<br />

x, Y<br />

2R +<br />

2<br />

x p,1<br />

, m (2)<br />

45<br />

with 0 r( ) 0; 2R1nZI<br />

r( )<br />

x, Y<br />

2R +<br />

2<br />

r( )<br />

x, Y<br />

2R +<br />

3<br />

r( )<br />

x, m (3)<br />

with m as above and all exponents runnn<strong>in</strong>g from 0 to p , 1 are a basis <strong>of</strong> V . The<br />

elements <strong>in</strong> (2) are a subset <strong>of</strong> this basis, hence l<strong>in</strong>early <strong>in</strong>dependent.<br />

We have dimu = jR +<br />

2 j + jR+ 3 j. Therefore a comparison <strong>of</strong> (3) and (2) shows<br />

that the elements <strong>in</strong> (2) span a subspace <strong>of</strong> dimension equal to dim(V )=p dim u .<br />

This is by E.1(4) also the dimension <strong>of</strong> V u . So the claim will follow ifwe can show<br />

that all elements <strong>in</strong> (2) belong to V u .<br />

There exists a group homomorphism d : ZR ! Z with d( ) = 0 for all<br />

2 R1 and d( ) > 0 for all 2 R with g u, i.e., for all 2 (,R +<br />

2 ) [ R+ 3 .<br />

(If belongs to the basis <strong>of</strong> R used to construct u <strong>in</strong> E.1, then set d( )=1if<br />

=2 R1 and d( ) = 0 otherwise.) We get then a Z{grad<strong>in</strong>g on g such that each g<br />

is homogeneous <strong>of</strong> degree d( ) and such that h is homogeneous <strong>of</strong> degree 0. Then<br />

l is the homogeneous component <strong>of</strong> degree 0 and u is the sum <strong>of</strong> the homogeneous<br />

components <strong>of</strong> positive degree. This <strong>in</strong>duces a grad<strong>in</strong>g on U(g) and then also on<br />

U (g). (For the last claim one uses that vanishes by E.1(2) on all x not <strong>in</strong> l.)<br />

The subalgebra pI <strong>of</strong> g is graded (s<strong>in</strong>ce it is spanned by h and certa<strong>in</strong> x , hence<br />

by homogeneous elements). If we giveMthe trivial grad<strong>in</strong>g (where everyth<strong>in</strong>g has<br />

degree 0), then it becomes a graded pI{module. (The homogeneous components<br />

<strong>of</strong> pI <strong>of</strong> non-zero degree belong to the nilradical <strong>of</strong> pI and act as 0.) This leads<br />

then to a grad<strong>in</strong>g on the <strong>in</strong>duced U (g){module V .<br />

Each basis element <strong>in</strong> (3) is homogeneous [<strong>of</strong> degree , P r( )d( )]. We get<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> maximal degree if we choose r( )=p , 1 whenever d( ) < 0, and<br />

r( ) = 0 whenever d( ) > 0. We haveto admit arbitrary m and arbitrary r( )<br />

whenever d( )=0. If 2 R + ,thenwehaved( ) = 0 if and only if 2 R1, and<br />

d( ) < 0 if and only if g, u if and only if 2 R +<br />

2 . It follows that the elements<br />

<strong>in</strong> (2) are precisely the elements <strong>in</strong> (3) that have maximal degree. So they are a<br />

basis for the homogeneous component <strong>of</strong> maximal degree <strong>of</strong> V . S<strong>in</strong>ce each x 2 u<br />

maps an element <strong>of</strong> some degree to an element <strong>of</strong> higher degree, all elements <strong>in</strong><br />

(2) are annihilated by u. The lemma follows.<br />

E.3. Lemma: We have<br />

x Y<br />

2R +<br />

2<br />

x p,1<br />

,<br />

Y<br />

m =<br />

2R +<br />

2<br />

x p,1<br />

, x m (1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!