06.08.2013 Views

subregular nilpotent representations of lie algebras in prime ...

subregular nilpotent representations of lie algebras in prime ...

subregular nilpotent representations of lie algebras in prime ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C.6. We nowwant to de ne for each w 2 W a homomorphism<br />

' w : Z (w ) ,! Z ( ) (1)<br />

as follows: If w = s1s2 :::sr is a reduced decomposition (with si = s i for some<br />

simple root i) then we want tohave<br />

' w = ' 1;sr ' sr;sr,1sr ' s2:::sr,1sr;s1s2:::sr,1sr (2)<br />

where the s<strong>in</strong>gle factors are de ned <strong>in</strong> C.5. One has to check the <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>of</strong><br />

the right hand side <strong>in</strong> (2) <strong>of</strong> the chosen reduced decomposition. It is (as usual)<br />

enough to check the \braid relations" for each pair ; ,( 6= ) <strong>of</strong> simple roots.<br />

For example, if s s has order 3, then we have tocheck for each x 2 W with<br />

x ,1 ; x ,1 >0 that<br />

' x;s x ' s x;s s x ' s s x;s s s x = ' x;s x ' s x;s s x ' s s x;s s s x :<br />

This follows from the Verma relations, see [4], 7.8.8; similarly <strong>in</strong> the cases where<br />

s s has order 2, 4, or 6.<br />

Now that the ' w are well-de ned, we get for all w 2 W and all simple roots<br />

with w ,1 >0 that<br />

' s w = ' w ' w;s w (3)<br />

s<strong>in</strong>ce we get a reduced decomposition <strong>of</strong> s w when we multiply a reduced decomposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> W on the left by s .<br />

C.7. Set for all w 2 W<br />

the submodule correspond<strong>in</strong>g to w.<br />

sbm(w; )=im(' w ) Z ( ) (1)<br />

Lemma: Let be a simple root and w an element <strong>in</strong> W with w ,1 >0.<br />

a) We have sbm(s w; ) sbm(w; ).<br />

b) If (x, ) 6= 0, then sbm(s w; )=sbm(w; ).<br />

c) If (x, )=0, then sbm(s w; ) is a homomorphic image <strong>of</strong> Z (s w ; ),<br />

and sbm(w; )= sbm(s w; ) is a homomorphic image <strong>of</strong> Z (w ; ).<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong> : The identity ' s w = ' w ' w;s w from C.6(3) imp<strong>lie</strong>s a). If (x, ) 6= 0,<br />

then ' w;s w is an isomorphism; this yields b).<br />

Suppose now that (x, ) = 0. Denote the image <strong>of</strong> ' w;s w by M. ThenM<br />

is isomorphic to Z (s w ; ), and Z (w )=M is isomorphic to Z (w ; ). Now<br />

the claim <strong>in</strong> c) follows from sbm(s w; )=' w(M) and sbm(w; )=' w(Z (w )).<br />

Remark: It is sometimes more convenient to restate the last part <strong>of</strong> the lemma as<br />

follows: Let w 2 W and 2 R + such that w is a simple root with (x,w )=0.<br />

Then sbm(ws ; ) is a homomorphic image <strong>of</strong> Z (ws ; w ), and sbm(w; )= sbm<br />

(ws ; ) is a homomorphic image <strong>of</strong> Z (w ; ). [Note that sw w = ws .]<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!