Draft Town Belt Management Plan - Wellington City Council
Draft Town Belt Management Plan - Wellington City Council Draft Town Belt Management Plan - Wellington City Council
1839, and noted “the rata, with its crimson flowers, being conspicuous” 105 on Te Ahumairangi Hill (Tinakori Hill). Kanuka shrubland and fern covered the Mt Victoria ridge (Te Ranga a Hiwi) and there were clearings used for Māori cultivation (see Appendix 3). In 1843, Colonel Wakefield, of the New Zealand Company, in a letter protesting against the Borough of Wellington’s intention to lease out Town Belt land, declared the forest to be “one of the greatest ornaments of the Town.” 106 Despite government prohibitions against bush clearance, however, the Town Belt had by the 1870s been cleared of forest, converted to pasture with large areas leased out for grazing. The result was a backdrop of bare, windswept hills around a largely treeless settlement. Wellington was, according to the 1897 Cyclopaedia of New Zealand, the “ugliest ... in the colony” 107 . Figure 9: Te Ahumairangi Hill (Tinakori Hill), with native forest partly cleared, 1863. (Ferguson Collection, Alexander Turnbull Library, PA7-09-02) The first re-greening By the 1880s, with Wellington well established and now run by a locally based civic government, Wellington’s citizens began to clamour for beautification planting. Provision had been made in 1871, that when the Town Belt was transferred to the Council, half the revenue derived from the land would be used for its “ornamentation and utilisation”. But no significant planting occurred on the Town Belt until 1880. This may have been partly due to the difficulty of getting trees to grow on Wellington’s exposed hillsides. Fortunately, experimental planting at the Botanic Garden during the 1870s demonstrated the suitability of certain introduced species. The garden donated around 600 surplus conifers to the Wellington Lunatic Asylum in 1872 and to Wellington College in 1873. The resulting plantations, although both on alienated land, were the earliest examples of deliberate tree planting on what was originally Town Belt. They showed what could be done and were distinctive landmarks in the Wellington landscape for decades. In 1880, the Council undertook the first large scale planting on Town Belt land – at Newtown Park and the Pirie/Ellice streets area on the slopes of Mt Victoria. Planting slowed during the recession of the 1880s and 1890s but, by 1900, further plantations had been established in the Hutchison Road, Queens Park, Victoria Park and Nairn Street Reserve areas. 105 “Charles Heaphy, “Notes Port Nicholson and the Natives in 1839,” Transactions of the New Zealand Institute, 1879, Vol 12. 86. 106 New Zealand Gazette and Wellington Spectator, Volume IV, Issue 272, 16 August 1843, 3. 107 The Cyclopedia of New Zealand, (Wellington: Cyclopedia Co, 1897). Draft Town Belt Management Plan October 2012 215
The plantation years Public agitation for planting continued. The Scenery Preservation Society was formed in the mid- 1890s and undertook a number of self-funded reserve planting projects, including Town Belt sites, over the following decade. In 1906, an editorial in the New Zealand Mail 108 deplored the Council’s expenditure on bedding plants in preference to trees and, in 1910, the Evening Post suggested fundraising “to buy some decent covering for the Cinderella of the Town Belt” 109 . Mass planting resumed again in the early 1900s and continued into the 1930s. Relief labour employed under central government and Council unemployment relief schemes greatly assisted the completion of the major plantations by 1940. During this period, Council reorganisation in 1913 saw the setting up of a Forestry Department. It was soon absorbed into the new Parks and Reserves Department, set up in 1918 to, among other things, apply a more comprehensive style of management to the Council’s reserves, with better integration of recreational and scenic objectives. 216 Figure 10: View from the new tramway on Brooklyn Road, 1907. Tree planting in Central Park (left) began this year. In the distance, the early Pirie/Ellice streets plantations can be seen on the otherwise mainly bare Mt Victoria ridge. (Wellington City Council Collection, Alexander Turnbull Library, G 025451 1/1) Much of the planting still relied on the fast-growing conifers that the Botanic Garden had found tolerant of Wellington’s clay soils and strong winds – in particular, radiata pine and macrocarpa. However, from the 1910s, mixed plantings with a wider selection of other conifers, eucalyptus trees, wattles and deciduous trees were also used. Native species, too, were planted extensively in the 1920s and 1930s, including pohutukawa, griselinia, karo, ngaio and lacebarks. Long before the 1970s, when the regenerative capacity of native vegetation became well known, the first Director of Parks and Reserves, J. G. McKenzie, saw the conifers as a means of suppressing gorse and providing shelter for native forest to regenerate 110 . He was subsequently proved right, although the conifers proved a far longer-living nursery cover then he anticipated. During the 1920s and 1930s there were calls for the plantations to be methodically planned for potential commercial harvest 111 . Although the Parks Department did plan planting configurations these were designed to withstand wind and provide shelter for young planting rather than quality timber. In reality, plantings were often haphazard, according to what land became available as grazing leases ended. Little, if any, silvicultural work was carried out. 108 “Our Treelessness,” The New Zealand Mail, August 15, 1906, 69. 109 Evening Post, 14 March 1910, 6. 110 Cook, “Background Report,” 20. 111 Follows, 26. Draft Town Belt Management Plan October 2012
- Page 167 and 168: 8.9.4 Recreation Mt Victoria is mai
- Page 169 and 170: Herd St Roxburgh St Caroline St Bro
- Page 171 and 172: Sector 9 - Mt Victoria Management a
- Page 173 and 174: Site name Legal description and are
- Page 175 and 176: 9.2.6. Manage and maintain discreti
- Page 177 and 178: 174 • lease • licence • permi
- Page 179 and 180: 9.5.2 Signs 176 a. No signs or hoar
- Page 181 and 182: 178 (i) no practicable alternative
- Page 183 and 184: 180 Encroachments into the Town Bel
- Page 185 and 186: 182 encroachments, botanical enhanc
- Page 187 and 188: Appendix 1 Town Belt and Basin Rese
- Page 189 and 190: thereby granted which may be reason
- Page 191 and 192: Appendix 2 Land Schedules Land cove
- Page 193 and 194: Land protected under the 1873 Town
- Page 195 and 196: Name & Location Area Comprised in D
- Page 197 and 198: left to lie fallow. The garden area
- Page 199 and 200: Moera: Moe-ra (Moe-i-ra 54 or Moe-i
- Page 201 and 202: Waitangi Tribunal, Te Whanganui ā
- Page 203 and 204: iii. Best, E, Journal of the Polyne
- Page 205 and 206: 202 Draft Town Belt Management Plan
- Page 207 and 208: 204 Draft Town Belt Management Plan
- Page 209 and 210: Appendix 4 Town Belt historical out
- Page 211 and 212: 208 Figure 1: Plan of the town of W
- Page 213 and 214: aesthetic possibilities of the “r
- Page 215 and 216: uilding leases grew, prompting the
- Page 217: 214 The Wellington Zoological Garde
- Page 221 and 222: The new balance - indigenous and ex
- Page 223 and 224: Resource use To many of the early s
- Page 225 and 226: Other communications uses have incl
- Page 227 and 228: 224 Figure 16: Aerial view taken in
- Page 229 and 230: 5. Citizen action The Town Belt has
- Page 231 and 232: Pragmatism appears to have driven s
The plantation years<br />
Public agitation for planting continued. The Scenery Preservation Society was formed in the mid-<br />
1890s and undertook a number of self-funded reserve planting projects, including <strong>Town</strong> <strong>Belt</strong> sites,<br />
over the following decade. In 1906, an editorial in the New Zealand Mail 108 deplored the <strong>Council</strong>’s<br />
expenditure on bedding plants in preference to trees and, in 1910, the Evening Post suggested<br />
fundraising “to buy some decent covering for the Cinderella of the <strong>Town</strong> <strong>Belt</strong>” 109 .<br />
Mass planting resumed<br />
again in the early 1900s<br />
and continued into the<br />
1930s. Relief labour<br />
employed under central<br />
government and<br />
<strong>Council</strong> unemployment<br />
relief schemes greatly<br />
assisted the completion<br />
of the major plantations<br />
by 1940.<br />
During this period,<br />
<strong>Council</strong> reorganisation<br />
in 1913 saw the setting<br />
up of a Forestry<br />
Department. It was<br />
soon absorbed into the<br />
new Parks and Reserves<br />
Department, set up in<br />
1918 to, among other<br />
things, apply a more<br />
comprehensive style of<br />
management to the<br />
<strong>Council</strong>’s reserves, with<br />
better integration of<br />
recreational and scenic objectives.<br />
216<br />
Figure 10: View from the new tramway on Brooklyn Road, 1907.<br />
Tree planting in Central Park (left) began this year. In the distance,<br />
the early Pirie/Ellice streets plantations can be seen on the<br />
otherwise mainly bare Mt Victoria ridge.<br />
(<strong>Wellington</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Collection, Alexander Turnbull Library, G 025451 1/1)<br />
Much of the planting still relied on the fast-growing conifers that the Botanic Garden had found<br />
tolerant of <strong>Wellington</strong>’s clay soils and strong winds – in particular, radiata pine and macrocarpa.<br />
However, from the 1910s, mixed plantings with a wider selection of other conifers, eucalyptus trees,<br />
wattles and deciduous trees were also used. Native species, too, were planted extensively in the<br />
1920s and 1930s, including pohutukawa, griselinia, karo, ngaio and lacebarks. Long before the<br />
1970s, when the regenerative capacity of native vegetation became well known, the first Director of<br />
Parks and Reserves, J. G. McKenzie, saw the conifers as a means of suppressing gorse and<br />
providing shelter for native forest to regenerate 110 . He was subsequently proved right, although the<br />
conifers proved a far longer-living nursery cover then he anticipated.<br />
During the 1920s and 1930s there were calls for the plantations to be methodically planned for<br />
potential commercial harvest 111 . Although the Parks Department did plan planting configurations<br />
these were designed to withstand wind and provide shelter for young planting rather than quality<br />
timber. In reality, plantings were often haphazard, according to what land became available as<br />
grazing leases ended. Little, if any, silvicultural work was carried out.<br />
108 “Our Treelessness,” The New Zealand Mail, August 15, 1906, 69.<br />
109 Evening Post, 14 March 1910, 6.<br />
110 Cook, “Background Report,” 20.<br />
111 Follows, 26.<br />
<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>Town</strong> <strong>Belt</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> October 2012