06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

interpenetration occur, rather the boundary demarcating volume loss migrates outward<br />

<strong>and</strong> into the surrounding material.<br />

Central to the anticrack-inclusion concept, <strong>and</strong> the mechanical analyses to follow, is<br />

the prescription <strong>of</strong> the model CB as an isolated feature <strong>of</strong> nonlinear inelastic strain that<br />

evolves quasi-statically in an infinite, homogeneous, isotropic, linear elastic continuum<br />

subject to uniform remote loading. All aspects <strong>of</strong> this model prescription warrant<br />

comment. Firstly, given the regional tectonic nature <strong>of</strong> the compression <strong>and</strong> a study area<br />

situated in the midst <strong>of</strong> a 1,400-m-thick s<strong>and</strong>stone deposit, the approximation <strong>of</strong> uniform<br />

remote stresses applied to an infinite material is reasonable. Given a ratio <strong>of</strong> trace length<br />

to spacing generally less than 0.1, it would be difficult to argue that any CB in the Aztec<br />

s<strong>and</strong>stone is truly isolated in a mechanical sense. Nonetheless, the specific field data on<br />

which the conceptual model is based comes from planar b<strong>and</strong>s that betray little reaction<br />

to their nearest neighbors.<br />

As with any granular material, the applicability <strong>of</strong> homogeneous continuity is scale<br />

dependent. In the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone, with an average grain diameter <strong>of</strong> 0.25 mm, this<br />

becomes reasonable at the cm-scale (Amadei <strong>and</strong> Stephansson, 1997), which represents a<br />

lower limit <strong>of</strong> resolution for interpreting the mechanical modeling results. To focus on<br />

grain-scale processes inside <strong>and</strong> immediately outside a CB, the distinct element method<br />

approach would be appropriate (Antonellini <strong>and</strong> Pollard, 1995; Morgan, 1999; Morgan<br />

<strong>and</strong> Boettcher, 1999). Also problematic at a larger scale is the application <strong>of</strong><br />

homogeneous isotropy to the complex æolian sedimentary architecture <strong>of</strong> the Aztec.<br />

Major dune boundaries influence CBs, so this conceptual model is based on data from an<br />

outcrop <strong>of</strong> b<strong>and</strong>s located within a single dune package. Given that CBs commonly cut<br />

across depositional bedding without apparent effect, we interpret the mechanical<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> such layering as negligible. Finally, the assumption <strong>of</strong> quasi-static CB<br />

<strong>propagation</strong> is based on the coherent nature <strong>of</strong> plastic quartz grain deformation within the<br />

b<strong>and</strong>s, which suggests stable <strong>propagation</strong> accommodated by slow, visco-elastic relaxation<br />

(Chester et al., 2004; Karner et al., 2003). By the same token, the paucity <strong>of</strong> plastic<br />

deformation outside the b<strong>and</strong>s suggests predominantly elastic behavior through time.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!