structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7. Concluding observations<br />
The data <strong>and</strong> analyses presented above indicate that CBs formed as anticracks in the<br />
Aztec while it comprised a shallowly buried, weakly lithified s<strong>and</strong>stone aquifer subjected<br />
to regional compression associated with the earliest phases <strong>of</strong> Sevier tectonism in the area.<br />
Interpreted as such, the presence <strong>of</strong> two orthogonal, coeval <strong>and</strong> coexisting sets <strong>of</strong> CBs<br />
can be used to constrain the 3-D paleostress state in which they formed, with the<br />
dominant set orthogonal to the maximum compressive stress (σ1) <strong>and</strong> the secondary set<br />
orthogonal to intermediate compressive stress (σ2). Furthermore, the mutually cross-<br />
cutting presence <strong>of</strong> both sets in the same outcrop suggests that σ1 ≈ σ2. That the inferred<br />
paleostress orientations depart radically from classical Andersonian expectations can<br />
reasonably be interpreted as evidence <strong>of</strong> as yet unrecognized regional structures,<br />
specifically a relatively shallow detachment along which a coherent <strong>structural</strong> block<br />
containing the Aztec now exposed in the Valley <strong>of</strong> Fire moved relatively westward.<br />
Based on an average spacing between CBs <strong>of</strong> the dominant, north-south trending set<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.7 m, <strong>and</strong> an average b<strong>and</strong> thickness <strong>of</strong> 1 cm representing 10% uniaxial compaction<br />
(~1.1 mm), the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone experienced less than 0.2% total shortening as the result<br />
<strong>of</strong> CB formation. Even assuming an average b<strong>and</strong> spacing <strong>of</strong> only 10 cm hardly bumps<br />
the shortening past 1%. If homogeneously distributed, dropping overall porosity from<br />
25% to 24%, such a mild deformation event would be <strong>of</strong> no consequence to fluid flow.<br />
The highly localized, yet pervasively interconnected nature <strong>of</strong> the CB fabric formed,<br />
however, constitutes a considerable network <strong>of</strong> low-permeability baffles to fluid flow<br />
(CB permeability ~0.1% <strong>of</strong> the inherent s<strong>and</strong>stone permeability) that has been shown<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> exerting pr<strong>of</strong>ound effects at scales <strong>of</strong> practical interest (Sternl<strong>of</strong> et al., 2004;<br />
Sternl<strong>of</strong> et al., 2006).<br />
The analysis presented here <strong>of</strong> compaction b<strong>and</strong>s as indicators <strong>of</strong> paleostress in <strong>and</strong><br />
tectonic structure around the exhumed analog aquifer/reservoir that is the Aztec<br />
s<strong>and</strong>stone can also be applied in reverse. That is, given independent knowledge <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tectonic stress <strong>and</strong> material history <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>and</strong>stone similar to the Aztec, reasonable<br />
forecasts <strong>of</strong> the possible presence <strong>and</strong> gross geometry <strong>of</strong> CBs in the subsurface can be<br />
made. Such insights could prove highly valuable in the efficient development aquifers<br />
<strong>and</strong> reservoirs.<br />
37