06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dihedral angle <strong>of</strong> 80° or more, <strong>and</strong> so appear to have formed contemporaneously (Sternl<strong>of</strong><br />

et al., 2004).<br />

4.2. Anticrack model<br />

The highly eccentric elliptical tip-to-tip pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>and</strong> uniform uniaxial internal<br />

compaction observed for individual CBs corresponds to a pure closing-mode sense <strong>of</strong><br />

relative boundary displacement distributed across a very thin b<strong>and</strong>. This geometry <strong>and</strong><br />

anti-mode I sense <strong>of</strong> displacement discontinuity defines CBs kinematically <strong>and</strong><br />

mechanically as anticracks (Mollema <strong>and</strong> Antonellini, 1996; Sternl<strong>of</strong> et al., 2005). As<br />

such, they would form symmetric with (orthogonal to) the direction <strong>of</strong> maximum<br />

compressive stress in an otherwise homogeneous, isotropic material (Figure 1.5), except<br />

when mechanically interacting with each other (Sternl<strong>of</strong> et al., 2005; Chapter 4 this<br />

thesis). The anticrack interpretation suggests that the normal to the dominant planar<br />

orientation <strong>of</strong> CBs in the Valley <strong>of</strong> Fire coincides with the direction <strong>of</strong> maximum<br />

compressive paleostress (σ1) acting regionally when they formed. In locations where a<br />

subsidiary set <strong>of</strong> cross-hatch CBs also formed, we suggest these reflect the orientation <strong>of</strong><br />

the intermediate principal paleostress (σ2), speculating that σ1 ≈ σ2 locally <strong>and</strong> that the<br />

preferred CB orientation flip-flopped between the two (see Chapter 4, this thesis).<br />

4.3. Outcrop to regional scale<br />

As described in the section on deposition, the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone is neither truly<br />

homogeneous nor isotropic. Rather, it is a granular material deposited in variable bedding<br />

orientations arranged as packages within a complex æolian sedimentary architecture. We<br />

suggest that this heterogeneous reality, coupled with apparently strong mechanical<br />

interactions between adjacent CBs, leads to the highly variable b<strong>and</strong> patterns commonly<br />

observed at outcrop scales. As the scale <strong>of</strong> observation increases, however, the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> these local complications drops away. At a scale <strong>of</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> meters (Sternl<strong>of</strong> et al.,<br />

2006) to kilometers, the approximately planar fabric defined by north-northwest trending,<br />

steeply east-dipping b<strong>and</strong>s dominates, suggesting distributed formation in response to,<br />

<strong>and</strong> generally orthogonal with a paleo direction <strong>of</strong> regional compression.<br />

Finally, while CBs can be found in upper Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone outcrops throughout<br />

southeastern Nevada, it is important to note that large exposures essentially devoid <strong>of</strong><br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!