structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
on detailed outcrop <strong>and</strong> thin-section observations <strong>of</strong> the Aztec as extensively exposed in<br />
the Valley <strong>of</strong> Fire State Park (Figure 1.1).<br />
Stepping back from the wide variety <strong>of</strong> patterns visible in individual outcrops, the two<br />
most striking aspects <strong>of</strong> CBs in the Aztec as a whole are their ubiquity <strong>and</strong> the general<br />
consistency <strong>of</strong> their planar orientation: north-northwest trending, steeply east dipping.<br />
Considering the Aztec as an exhumed analog for active s<strong>and</strong>stone aquifers <strong>and</strong> reservoirs,<br />
the potential for such an anastomosing CB fabric to restrict <strong>and</strong> channel fluid flow is<br />
substantial (Sternl<strong>of</strong> et al., 2004; Sternl<strong>of</strong> et al., 2006). The practical goal behind all CB<br />
investigations is to develop the capability to predict, or at least forecast their occurrence<br />
in the subsurface such that their hydraulic effects can be mitigated. Achieving this goal<br />
will require underst<strong>and</strong>ing how, in what kinds <strong>of</strong> materials <strong>and</strong> under what loading<br />
conditions CBs form. As a contribution to this endeavor, we present a broad look at the<br />
thin-section to regional scale <strong>structural</strong> <strong>geology</strong> <strong>of</strong> CBs in the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone at the<br />
Valley <strong>of</strong> Fire, <strong>and</strong> consider their implications for the tectonic framework <strong>and</strong> history <strong>of</strong><br />
southern Nevada.<br />
3. Setting <strong>and</strong> history <strong>of</strong> study area<br />
The following synopsis <strong>of</strong> the geological setting <strong>and</strong> history <strong>of</strong> the Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone<br />
was synthesized from data <strong>and</strong> interpretations published in a wide variety <strong>of</strong> sources over<br />
the past 85 years as cited below. Given that the methods <strong>and</strong> perspectives <strong>of</strong> <strong>structural</strong><br />
<strong>geology</strong> have evolved a great deal since the first research on the area was published<br />
during the Wilson administration (Longwell, 1921), long before any modern notion <strong>of</strong><br />
tectonics, we emphasize here more recent work <strong>and</strong> interpretations.<br />
3.1. Deposition<br />
The Aztec s<strong>and</strong>stone was deposited during latest Triassic to middle Jurassic time in a<br />
back-arc basin associated with uplift <strong>of</strong> the ancestral Sierra Nevadan magmatic arc<br />
(Marzolf, 1986; Burchfiel et al., 1992). It comprises the southwestern edge <strong>of</strong> a much<br />
larger æolian erg system, which includes the Navajo <strong>and</strong> Nugget s<strong>and</strong>stones <strong>and</strong><br />
blanketed much <strong>of</strong> the intermountain southwest (Blakey, 1989; Marzolf, 1986).<br />
Prevailing winds during deposition <strong>of</strong> the Aztec are interpreted to have blown out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
northeast <strong>and</strong> over the shallow sea occupying what is now the continental interior<br />
(Marzolf, 1982, 1986).<br />
11