06.08.2013 Views

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

structural geology, propagation mechanics and - Stanford School of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. Simulations<br />

Three sets <strong>of</strong> 2-D simulations were performed. The first set prescribes single-phase,<br />

incompressible well-to-well flow for a series <strong>of</strong> well pairs to examine how the b<strong>and</strong><br />

pattern affects the pressure drop required to maintain a given flow rate. The second set <strong>of</strong><br />

simulations prescribes two-phase, incompressible flow for a st<strong>and</strong>ard five-spot petroleum<br />

reservoir production scenario with central injector to examine how the orientation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

well array relative to the b<strong>and</strong> pattern influences production efficiency. For this<br />

production scenario, the effects <strong>of</strong> relative permeability are considered with water as the<br />

wetting phase <strong>and</strong> oil as the nonwetting phase. The third set <strong>of</strong> simulations prescribes<br />

incompressible contaminant transport (mobility ratio = 1) for a point-source release to<br />

examine the relationship <strong>of</strong> regional gradient direction to b<strong>and</strong> pattern in determining the<br />

shape <strong>and</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> the resulting plume.<br />

5.1. Well-to-well flow<br />

In order to characterize the bulk effects <strong>of</strong> the CB array as mapped, we first performed<br />

a series <strong>of</strong> 210 single-phase, incompressible well-to-well flow simulations for a fixed<br />

flow rate using injector-producer well pairs spaced 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 <strong>and</strong> 200 m<br />

apart. At 15 midpoint locations scattered within the b<strong>and</strong> pattern, two simulations were<br />

performed for each well-spacing—one oriented generally parallel to (along) the dominant<br />

b<strong>and</strong> trend <strong>and</strong> one oriented generally normal to (across) it (Figure 7.6). For every<br />

simulation, the pressure drop measured between the wells in the presence <strong>of</strong> the b<strong>and</strong>s<br />

was normalized by the corresponding CB-free (homogeneous, isotropic s<strong>and</strong>stone matrix)<br />

value. The resulting normalized pressure drop data (∆P) are presented graphically in<br />

Figure 7.7.<br />

5.1.1. Results<br />

The most basic observation is that the pressure drop required to drive flow in the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> the b<strong>and</strong>s always exceeds that for the CB-free case (Figure 7.7a). With a<br />

range from 1.7 to 4.2 <strong>and</strong> a mean <strong>of</strong> about 2.9, there is a slight trend toward increasing ∆P<br />

with decreasing well spacing. Also, the pressure drop required to drive flow across the<br />

dominant b<strong>and</strong> trend (∆Pn) generally exceeds that required to drive flow along it (∆Pp) by<br />

an average <strong>of</strong> about 25% (Figure 7.7b). In other words, a modest degree <strong>of</strong><br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!